121 By dismissing the case outright on "lack of standing", SCOTUS ruled that the Presidency has no authority over the States filing. This defacto breaks the core of the Constitution that we are entitled to federal representation. (media.patriots.win) 🤡🌎 HONK HONK 🌎🤡 posted 125 days ago by BrakeRemovalMechanic 125 days ago by BrakeRemovalMechanic +121 / -0 15 comments share 15 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (15) sorted by: top new old worst You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread. ▲ 3 ▼ – BrakeRemovalMechanic [S] 3 points 125 days ago +3 / -0 So the result of presidential representation for that state is not injury? Or does the president not represent Texas? permalink save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – bewwwbbbskizzle 1 point 125 days ago +2 / -1 Direct Injury? No. If a state physically prevented another state's electors from attending the College, that would be a direct injury. This is not. Relax. SCOTUS will hear these merits in another case brought by Trump himself, soon enough. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – glow-operator-2-0 1 point 125 days ago +1 / -0 What's the docket number on that one? permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 0 ▼ – deleted 0 points 125 days ago +1 / -1
So the result of presidential representation for that state is not injury? Or does the president not represent Texas?
Direct Injury? No.
If a state physically prevented another state's electors from attending the College, that would be a direct injury. This is not.
Relax. SCOTUS will hear these merits in another case brought by Trump himself, soon enough.
What's the docket number on that one?