posted ago by Tazhawkeye
+8 / -0
I am sad by the Texas decision. I recognize Trump is down by four with two outs in the ninth.
But we cannot turn the Courts into a dictatorship for our team. Texas must accept the decision by other states. Those states must have their individual cases run to the Supreme Court. If Texas filed four separate cases, I believe Texas would have had a case heard. By combining all four states, Texas was asking to lose.
I see this as a political exercise by the Texas AG.
I guess you need to read the constitution.
I’ve read it and I am trying to memorize it. I think most of us on thedonald need to do the same. Bad things happen when good men do nothing. We all need to run for office.
This case was a bad idea. All four together was asking for defeat.
At the point where they decline to hear this case, having more of the same won't make a difference. I was holding out for sane heads to prevail, but I don't have faith in the system anymore.
It's not a system anymore. It's political get rich snobs out for their own good.
what I mean is that, especially for SCOTUS judges, it's not a black-or-white situation, like if you rule against Trump you're a vile traitor, and if you rule for him you're a brave patriot.
You could very well be a brave patriot to an extent, and still rule against Trump when you just received a phone call that made you believe that, I don't know, it might be the last time you see a single member of your family alive, some kind of shit like that?
I appreciate your reserve and I take it as a welcome oasis of rationality in this ocean of blind credulity.
However, on the other hand, we could observe that the Harrisson Deal accident is not exactly something that didn't pan out. Kind of hard to believe that this was accidental, if you look at the video. And oh, sheer luck! he happens to be Kemp's daughter's boyfriend. Just when people felt he might be eventually about to crack.
A lot of coincidences. If that was a message, it looks like Kemp got it. And everyone else got it too, as a side benefit.
There's not necessarily a need for actual blackmail. Just send the right message across and everyone goes back in line.
If I were a judge (even Trump's appointee), would I be willing to mess around in such a circumstance? I'm not entirely sure.
how about the 3rd hypothesis that the people he put there are all reasonable people but not superhumans, and that the pressure that went on them with this affair was just too much for them to put through?
I mean... think about Harrisson Deal. It's not a certainty, but if they went to such lengths for Kemp, do you think they let the judges make their own decision in peace? what kind of "argument" do you think they made?
Sorry, but I am not laying back and spreading my legs wide for the left and globalists to fuck me. Your mileage and leg spread may differ.......
The Supreme Court was from day one a dead end. Anyone who truly understands the Court and the Swamp knew this to be true.
Demanding that other States abide by the Electors Clause in the Constitution is not a Dictatorship, you dumbass.
In a national election, election laws or changes to them must go through the State legislature. The defendant States deliberately went AROUND their legislatures to make changes to the rules.
And if there were four separate cases, I believe the Supreme Court would have heard the case.
By combining four cases in one, the Texas AG wanted to lose. The Texas AG could have worked with three other states to each sue a different state.