2 Help Out A Legally Illiterate Pede With SCOTUS Rejection posted 71 days ago by Mike0xquitelong +2 / -0 9 comments share 9 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (9) sorted by: top new old worst ▲ 3 ▼ – deleted 3 points 71 days ago +3 / -0 ▲ 3 ▼ – EricRyan 3 points 71 days ago +3 / -0 No, it was based on standing not merit. Adjustments are gonna be made and filed again. Long way from over permalink save report block reply ▲ 3 ▼ – EliteNK 3 points 71 days ago +3 / -0 They rejected the standing, not the merits. permalink save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – Mike0xquitelong [S] 1 point 71 days ago +1 / -0 Gotcha. Thanks. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 3 ▼ – deleted 3 points 71 days ago +3 / -0 ▲ 3 ▼ – deleted 3 points 71 days ago +3 / -0 ▲ 2 ▼ – OrangeManAddict 2 points 71 days ago +2 / -0 No lol the case didn’t have standing not based on merit. Joke ruling. permalink save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – Mike0xquitelong [S] 1 point 71 days ago +1 / -0 Standing, not merit. Got it. Sigh. I have some research to do then. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – deleted 1 point 71 days ago +1 / -0
No, it was based on standing not merit. Adjustments are gonna be made and filed again. Long way from over
They rejected the standing, not the merits.
Gotcha. Thanks.
No lol the case didn’t have standing not based on merit. Joke ruling.
Standing, not merit. Got it. Sigh. I have some research to do then.