According to SCOTUS if a state does not follow the law it doesn't cause injury to other states. What then is stopping a state from sending as many electors as they want to vote on Monday? The other states have no standing to pursue remedy in court. VPOTUS would have no choice but to accept the electoral votes as valid.
Comments (9)
sorted by:
OMG..... Red States show up with 17760 Trump electors.... fuck them
v5yW8r HUICSe8C
If there are no rules to follow, then we will hold to no rules. If it comes to blood, then it comes to blood.
pJFZ EmEj4Yp OgW x0nNPOx 7jJ qGMds9 2C1s L2IM0F u TORYx mA2 RA5 F8 Gqs1TVKT qr bFUw 0j 824d7 ytbZ dT7Uq vPbYIn
Already looked that option up but the number of electors is determined by each state's 2 senators and number of representatives in the house.
IE Texas has 2 senators and 34 representatives so we get 36 electors
I'd like to see it happen but the house/senate can just count to 36 and then ignore the rest...
So Texas just appoints 1776 new house members. What are the other states going to do? Sue them? SCOTUS just pointed out states don’t have standing to sue other states.
3flj9SM
5HL Kvoa uwcrtGA5 Y7 OPL 6bQ W2mJ6 BJ oO6YYc vWa RyO gbC XmDLl SW 5D5AGWfmSH UmiH