Could that be why SCOTUS denied this one? The secret case had the plaintiff name

redacted ? Aren't SCOTUS cases normally publicly available? Maybe there is a bigger

classified case involving the military going on unknown to the public and the Texas

case was a way to increase support or root out traitors. General Flynn tweeted this

after SCOTUS decision "I could not say it any stronger. Take a deep breath. More to

come." I feel like there is a very big case going on in the background that we don't

know about most likely involving treason. I know this is wishful thinking but in the

SCOTUS decision Alito and Thomas even said Texas didn't have standing even though

they have taken the technical position that every case should between states should

be heard. Rudy also just mentioned on a news channel that the President would be

bringing a case to SCOTUS that DID have standing. IMO all of these front facing court

cases have been a giant PR strategy to lead the people to understand there was

massive fraud, China and Iran had access to Dominion, there are compromised US

officials (Swalwell leak, Hunter Biden investigation) so that if Trump starts charging

people with treason it doesn't look like he's rogue and just doing it because he lost.

The media has been trying to suppress and discredit all allegations of fraud so that if

Trump starts arresting people for treason they can mobilize people by smearing him as

Hitler but worse and deflect blame from their treason