14 Does SCOTUS's ruling to amount to "States don't have to strictly abide by the Constitution anymore?" Am I missing something? (I don't understand the reason for its rejection.) (media.patriots.win) posted 73 days ago by onetruecliff +14 / -0 8 comments share 8 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (8) sorted by: top new old worst ▲ 1 ▼ – thunderpussy 1 point 73 days ago +1 / -0 Pretty much, apparently. permalink save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – patrioticwinning3 1 point 73 days ago +1 / -0 I guess that means we don't need to abide by the Supreme Court anymore then... permalink save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – deleted 1 point 73 days ago +1 / -0 ▲ 1 ▼ – deleted 1 point 73 days ago +1 / -0 ▲ 1 ▼ – deleted 1 point 73 days ago +1 / -0 ▲ 1 ▼ – deleted 1 point 73 days ago +1 / -0 ▲ 1 ▼ – PatriotNebula 1 point 73 days ago +1 / -0 Sounds like it. I wonder if the plan is to spilt America. permalink save report block reply ▲ 0 ▼ – Rudyard 0 points 73 days ago +1 / -1 As far as I can tell. If a state cannot sue another state for breach of election law in the SCOTUS, then there is no venue for enforcing election law. Election law is meaningless. permalink save report block reply
Pretty much, apparently.
I guess that means we don't need to abide by the Supreme Court anymore then...
Sounds like it. I wonder if the plan is to spilt America.
As far as I can tell. If a state cannot sue another state for breach of election law in the SCOTUS, then there is no venue for enforcing election law. Election law is meaningless.