3118
Comments (132)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
119
MakeLiberalsCryAgain 119 points ago +119 / -0

SCOTUS did say all we needed was standing. Still, it seems like all the courts are too cowardly to even hear the case and let us present evidence. Good fucking luck, Sidney!! I pray for America.

63
danielh11 [S] 63 points ago +70 / -7

What if the strategy is so the liberals don’t think the SCOTUS is rigging it for Trump. Now they see that the SCOTUS is separate from Trump and if they overturn it with standing then there won’t be a civil war

78
coup13 78 points ago +80 / -2

Screw what people think. The law is the law and scotus needs to follow the law

43
deleted 43 points ago +43 / -0
19
Willholbert09 19 points ago +19 / -0

still plenty of time for that.

12
deleted 12 points ago +12 / -0
-2
deleted -2 points ago +1 / -3
11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
23
deleted 23 points ago +24 / -1
8
Mythologick 8 points ago +8 / -0

Bold move, cotton. Let’s see how it plays out for them.

2
CgMaui 2 points ago +3 / -1

When we get scary it's already too late.

19
deleted 19 points ago +19 / -0
6
Italiano1976 6 points ago +6 / -0

Yeah except MI still certified. Ran right over their weak cries.

15
Smubbs 15 points ago +15 / -0

The libs don't give a fuck if the pope decided it. they're gonna shit. And the word isn't overturned. We won. Us winning isn't overturning anything.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
4
PandoraBoxed 4 points ago +4 / -0

I like your thinking and agree with this!

21
evil-doer 21 points ago +22 / -1

SCOTUS did say all we needed was standing

Person A saying that element B was missing does not mean that B is ALL you need. It just means that B is needed, along with other unknowns.

Sorry but I like accuracy and this is a stretch.

14
MakeLiberalsCryAgain 14 points ago +14 / -0

Oh, I know it's a stretch. I see your point, and I could've worded this better. It seems the only reason for rejecting it was lack of standing (at least, that's the only reason they gave), so one would think if that issue were fixed, it would be accepted. Then again, they could cuck out and come up with another reason. We need a miracle. Actually, a handful of miracles, at this point.

7
EpstinDidntKilHimslf 7 points ago +7 / -0

Yeah, especially in Govt bureaucracy, you never know what else you need until you refile.

5
MrQuacker2020 5 points ago +6 / -1

You only have standing if you're a tranny or other like minded degenerate

2
Tazr671 2 points ago +2 / -0

No they didn't say "all we need" is standing. They said the States don't have standing and therefore they will not proceed further on a "shall have original jurisdiction" case.

1
MakeLiberalsCryAgain 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well, we know they will not take a case without standing, so our other cases better have standing. Pretty straightforward. However, yeah, that still doesn't guarantee they'll take them. Seems like everyone is just trying to oust Trump no matter the cost. When even the SCOTUS is against him, where he appointed THREE "justices", well, it's ain't good.