3118
Comments (132)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
21
evil-doer 21 points ago +22 / -1

SCOTUS did say all we needed was standing

Person A saying that element B was missing does not mean that B is ALL you need. It just means that B is needed, along with other unknowns.

Sorry but I like accuracy and this is a stretch.

14
MakeLiberalsCryAgain 14 points ago +14 / -0

Oh, I know it's a stretch. I see your point, and I could've worded this better. It seems the only reason for rejecting it was lack of standing (at least, that's the only reason they gave), so one would think if that issue were fixed, it would be accepted. Then again, they could cuck out and come up with another reason. We need a miracle. Actually, a handful of miracles, at this point.

7
EpstinDidntKilHimslf 7 points ago +7 / -0

Yeah, especially in Govt bureaucracy, you never know what else you need until you refile.