Activity on your link: all of those joinders, intervening and amici briefs attached to 220155 were rendered moot, I’m afraid. Parnell’s and Woods’ standalone cases at SC have not been ruled on yet, and there are some state level cases to watch.
Ah. But aren’t they appendages to the Texas case, not freestanding? Confusing... and I’m pretty good at internet but have trouble with the SC website search function.
Activity on your link: all of those joinders, intervening and amici briefs attached to 220155 were rendered moot, I’m afraid. Parnell’s and Woods’ standalone cases at SC have not been ruled on yet, and there are some state level cases to watch.
Ah. But aren’t they appendages to the Texas case, not freestanding? Confusing... and I’m pretty good at internet but have trouble with the SC website search function.