Is SCOTUS simply trying to get us to do this the constitutional way before they act and not taking the first case thrown to them because it could be abused in the future?
They just tossed a case for "no standing" when it was filed by someone representing a state because of issues related to how another state handled business that applies at a federal level and is going to affect all states. If they toss that type of case that means that NO state or representative of a state has "standing" to file a case when any other state does something that affects other states or contributes to something that occurs at the federal level.
In other words, the "supreme" court just ruled that no state can sue for anything any other state does no matter how much it affects the state filing the lawsuit.
That's the thing about precedent. Something only needs to legally happen once to set it and lock it in. It takes quite a bit to overturn that and the majority of judges will never go against it because it makes their lives easier as it takes the decision out of their hands and they can avoid any blame.
The part where the constitution says some things and the complaint was "Hey, all these guys? They didn't do the thing it said. Isn't this supposed to be a law?" ... that was the part where it had standing.
Here’s the problem. Your argument relies on precedent. SCOTUS has been real iffy on precedent since they threw out the 1st Amendment and 170 years of precedent in 1962 in favor of a psychologist and a line from a Jefferson letter taken out of context to mean the opposite of what his letter was conveying.
Texas tried to claim that what took place in other states had an affect on them, thus they were the injured party in the suit. Do they have actual evidence of this?
They are basically claiming wrongdoing by other states without having demonstrated what it did to them as the plaintiff. This is why Thomas and Alito said that they would be willing to hear it but couldn't remedy it.
I think this was a roll of the dice to test the waters with SCOTUS.
Texas has 38 electoral votes representing the people of Texas. A flawed/corrupt election potentially disenfranchises a legitimate vote, the fraudulent vote cancels it out. This means millions of Texas had their votes canceled by election fraud. In this sense Texas is 38 voters who represent all the Texans who voted for Trump. So what applies to a single voter applies to a state, and what applies to the state applies to a single voter. As Jenna Ellis says, Texas' standing in the Electoral College has clearly been affected. It's 38 electoral votes have been devalued in proportion to the electoral votes (wrongfully) given to Biden. Because of cheating, the candidate Texans voted for may not be elected. Each individual Trump voter's vote in Texas has been canceled because of the fuckery in the 4 swing state. The SCOTUS denial of standing on the basis that Texas is not affected is pure bullshit.
The way I take it, the states should figure out these disputes themselves. Not sure why we have a federal supreme court, if they won't hear disputes between states. All we want is an investigation. A chance to voice our testimonies. I don't care if half of dc was burned down tonight. Scotus, Congress, the Senate, fuck them all.
This was the first election I ever voted on because prior to this, I thought my vote, being from Kansas, was pointless. Kansas always goes red. But I voted this year because I knew the fraudulent activity would make it possible for Trump to lose. But boy were we wrong. The amount of fraud is staggering. But how can you prove it when affidavits, security footage, data experts, and sworn textimony get tossed to the side as not evidence. Start threatening these judges. We've let them walk all over us for decades. Somebody, please fight back.
I'm sick of RINOs trying to "look impartial" which basically ends up translating to hand victories to the left that they didn't earn so we look like we can compromise.
Only a motion to intervene. Not the same as filing a case as Plaintiff. You hand on to your doom, though. It makes you special. Now go listen to The Cure and fantasize about death,
Yes it very well could be. Separation of powers is key here and in the future of this country. It can’t come across as Trump working with the Supreme Court. He’s trying to settle this with as little violence as possible and to avoid a civil war at all costs. If that happens China is ready to pounce and take the opportunity to fight us in our weakened state, the only way they’d have a chance of winning a way with us. This way it looks like Trump is disappointed with the Supreme Court and they’re not just doing his bidding so when they take on the case after they fix the standing issue, it will look like a far less partial ruling.
A state suing other states has standing, no? That is the only court to settle it? So of the SCOTUS is not hearing cases they have original jurisdiction over, then why would they hear hers?
Court said although there’s standing there’s not injury to TX as a state.
There is, but it was a stretch. It’s not like 100% of the ppl of TX voted for Trump and the entire state was harmed due to malfeasance of other states.
I wish this was already happening tbh. What would they do? Call Trump a tyrant on MSM? They have been calling him every name in the book for years. He should rule with an iron fist until he and trustworthy allies like General Flynn can organize, clean up the country, wind restore order and honor.
Should be using DOJ cyber intel to gather tweets and Social media posts that are of leftist extremist nature. Not all Dems. But the lowest of the low. Antifa, 70% of Hollywood, Rachel Maddow, etc.. and put them into forced labor programs to repay their debts to civilized and law abiding society. Let THEM rebuild the cities they burned by mandate. Let THEM pay for it rather than our tax dollars. Teach them a lesson, and let the less radical idiots that appease them reflect on it all and retract back into their simpleton lives.
Other countries could decide to send in intervention. Then we're fighting WW3, and a Civil War at the same time.
Canada has already let China train on their soil, apparently. I have no doubt their soyboy leader would let any country that asked stage their while they attack us.
Yea file some more cases. This should have not been allowed in the first place. Trump said he knew this was going to happen why did he not have people in place to stop it.
I kind of have that feeling in my gut when youre 90% sure that your gf cheated on you, and now she is blowing up your phone trying to say she didnt and you want to believe it's not over but you also don't feel like there's any hope so you go "idk what the fuck to think anymore so imma hit the gym and blow off some steam, ttyl"
anyone else? or am i going to get downvoted to hell
This happened to me once, and I kicked her outta my place. She begged for a year to come back. I didn't hide in the gym. I faced the problem head on, and rectified the situation. POTUS will stay on point. He will hold the line.
They just dismissed a huge states vs states case which they have sole jurisdiction on, why do people think they’ll react differently to some private lawyers filing lawsuits, they will never see the evidence because they’re already compromised/cucked
What the Supreme Court is saying by not taking the case is the remedy for this situation is in the state legislatures. Why should the Supreme Court jump into a fight that can be won in the state legislatures? It's the state legislatures that are the feckless morons, not the Supreme Court. However, the door is still open for a case to make it to the Supreme Court if the complaint is made by one who has been injured or has had their civil rights violated.
LOL look Powell is talking a big game yet again! Will this be Biblical? Maybe this is the Kraken! Maybe the fictional server raid will rear its head again!
A grifter that got Flynn off the hook? A grifter that prosecuted dirty prosecuters? You're just parroting others who know nothing about her and can't be bothered to look it up. Have you read any of her filings? No, because it's easier to just disparage someone who hasn't made you feel all warm and fuzzy when you wanted it.
Oh point where i'm wrong asshat. The case was still going on and Trump had to pardon him. I'm not saying Sydney did a bad job, but the case was STILL GOING.
It was NOT still going, fuckhead. One rogue, Trump-hating judge was making a fool of himself with silly moves after ALL CHARGES DROPPED. But keep posting. Your ignorance is on full display.
Is SCOTUS simply trying to get us to do this the constitutional way before they act and not taking the first case thrown to them because it could be abused in the future?
What they just did can be abused in the future.
How do you figure? Not attacking just trying to wrap my mind around all of this.
They just tossed a case for "no standing" when it was filed by someone representing a state because of issues related to how another state handled business that applies at a federal level and is going to affect all states. If they toss that type of case that means that NO state or representative of a state has "standing" to file a case when any other state does something that affects other states or contributes to something that occurs at the federal level.
In other words, the "supreme" court just ruled that no state can sue for anything any other state does no matter how much it affects the state filing the lawsuit.
That's the thing about precedent. Something only needs to legally happen once to set it and lock it in. It takes quite a bit to overturn that and the majority of judges will never go against it because it makes their lives easier as it takes the decision out of their hands and they can avoid any blame.
Give an example?
The part where the constitution says some things and the complaint was "Hey, all these guys? They didn't do the thing it said. Isn't this supposed to be a law?" ... that was the part where it had standing.
Hmmm...anyone need a blue haired, nose pierced land whale to work in your fields?
Lmfao nice that gave me a good chuckle. But yes I could use a blue haired land whale for my plantation XD
"Work"
😂. You’re not wrong. They would make horrible slaves...fat, doughy, unmotivated
amendments supersede scotus rulings, but I get your point.
Sounds like texas now has leave to take over other state territories. What are they going to do? Sue Texas?
Here’s the problem. Your argument relies on precedent. SCOTUS has been real iffy on precedent since they threw out the 1st Amendment and 170 years of precedent in 1962 in favor of a psychologist and a line from a Jefferson letter taken out of context to mean the opposite of what his letter was conveying.
Texas tried to claim that what took place in other states had an affect on them, thus they were the injured party in the suit. Do they have actual evidence of this?
They are basically claiming wrongdoing by other states without having demonstrated what it did to them as the plaintiff. This is why Thomas and Alito said that they would be willing to hear it but couldn't remedy it.
I think this was a roll of the dice to test the waters with SCOTUS.
Texas has 38 electoral votes representing the people of Texas. A flawed/corrupt election potentially disenfranchises a legitimate vote, the fraudulent vote cancels it out. This means millions of Texas had their votes canceled by election fraud. In this sense Texas is 38 voters who represent all the Texans who voted for Trump. So what applies to a single voter applies to a state, and what applies to the state applies to a single voter. As Jenna Ellis says, Texas' standing in the Electoral College has clearly been affected. It's 38 electoral votes have been devalued in proportion to the electoral votes (wrongfully) given to Biden. Because of cheating, the candidate Texans voted for may not be elected. Each individual Trump voter's vote in Texas has been canceled because of the fuckery in the 4 swing state. The SCOTUS denial of standing on the basis that Texas is not affected is pure bullshit.
The way I take it, the states should figure out these disputes themselves. Not sure why we have a federal supreme court, if they won't hear disputes between states. All we want is an investigation. A chance to voice our testimonies. I don't care if half of dc was burned down tonight. Scotus, Congress, the Senate, fuck them all.
This was the first election I ever voted on because prior to this, I thought my vote, being from Kansas, was pointless. Kansas always goes red. But I voted this year because I knew the fraudulent activity would make it possible for Trump to lose. But boy were we wrong. The amount of fraud is staggering. But how can you prove it when affidavits, security footage, data experts, and sworn textimony get tossed to the side as not evidence. Start threatening these judges. We've let them walk all over us for decades. Somebody, please fight back.
Yes, my very observant fren! They literally told us how to do it!
Yes
Today could just be part of a larger dodge so Trump-appointed Justices look impartial.
I'm sick of RINOs trying to "look impartial" which basically ends up translating to hand victories to the left that they didn't earn so we look like we can compromise.
Now is the time to not give them a fucking inch.
That's not what I'm saying. The case will come back when it's refiled as Trump Vs. Biden -- Trump has standing, TX doesn't.
Trump had already intervened in the TX case. He was a co-plaintiff.
He said he was going to, I don't know if he did though.
He did
Only a motion to intervene. Not the same as filing a case as Plaintiff. You hand on to your doom, though. It makes you special. Now go listen to The Cure and fantasize about death,
It wasn't tossed out on lack of merit. Only on standing.
Like the courts give a shit?
They're not supposed to. Remember Bush Vs Gore? That hasn't happened yet. We only had Texas Vs Several States.
I have zero faith in our Judicial System at this point.
It's going to be a Contingent Election. Read up on that.
Good point
That’s some MASSIVE rationalizing going on there.
You're right. We should all slit our wrists. You go first!
Yes it very well could be. Separation of powers is key here and in the future of this country. It can’t come across as Trump working with the Supreme Court. He’s trying to settle this with as little violence as possible and to avoid a civil war at all costs. If that happens China is ready to pounce and take the opportunity to fight us in our weakened state, the only way they’d have a chance of winning a way with us. This way it looks like Trump is disappointed with the Supreme Court and they’re not just doing his bidding so when they take on the case after they fix the standing issue, it will look like a far less partial ruling.
A state suing other states has standing, no? That is the only court to settle it? So of the SCOTUS is not hearing cases they have original jurisdiction over, then why would they hear hers?
Court said although there’s standing there’s not injury to TX as a state.
There is, but it was a stretch. It’s not like 100% of the ppl of TX voted for Trump and the entire state was harmed due to malfeasance of other states.
And the Electoral College hasn’t voted yet, so their fraudulent electors haven’t caused damage to these states yet.
They’re not going to hear any cases about this, insurrection act and military tribunals
I wish this was already happening tbh. What would they do? Call Trump a tyrant on MSM? They have been calling him every name in the book for years. He should rule with an iron fist until he and trustworthy allies like General Flynn can organize, clean up the country, wind restore order and honor.
Should be using DOJ cyber intel to gather tweets and Social media posts that are of leftist extremist nature. Not all Dems. But the lowest of the low. Antifa, 70% of Hollywood, Rachel Maddow, etc.. and put them into forced labor programs to repay their debts to civilized and law abiding society. Let THEM rebuild the cities they burned by mandate. Let THEM pay for it rather than our tax dollars. Teach them a lesson, and let the less radical idiots that appease them reflect on it all and retract back into their simpleton lives.
Other countries could decide to send in intervention. Then we're fighting WW3, and a Civil War at the same time.
Canada has already let China train on their soil, apparently. I have no doubt their soyboy leader would let any country that asked stage their while they attack us.
Yea file some more cases. This should have not been allowed in the first place. Trump said he knew this was going to happen why did he not have people in place to stop it.
So he can catch the bad guys?
"Not over by a long-shot"
-Pepe the Frog
I could cry right now. I pray this works
I’ll trust Our Lord with my soul... however my country’s fate looks like it’s down to my trigger finger at this point.
I kind of have that feeling in my gut when youre 90% sure that your gf cheated on you, and now she is blowing up your phone trying to say she didnt and you want to believe it's not over but you also don't feel like there's any hope so you go "idk what the fuck to think anymore so imma hit the gym and blow off some steam, ttyl"
anyone else? or am i going to get downvoted to hell
This happened to me once, and I kicked her outta my place. She begged for a year to come back. I didn't hide in the gym. I faced the problem head on, and rectified the situation. POTUS will stay on point. He will hold the line.
Who is Tracy Beanz?
She has a podcast about politics.
not sure what she does professionally, but she start one of the first major subs to get banned from reddit after pizzagate... r/greatawakening
in which we discussed Q stuff...
and she took a lot of shit for it.
look where she is now :).
Good job, Tracy.
language!
God Bless Sidney Powell.
We need to amass a million person Army and March through the United States arresting every single fucking traitor.. Put them up for Tribunals...
True but you can't really say that here, many people can't see through it.
Her lawsuits are a mess, she is trying and I'll give her that but the Texas suit was a far better hope.
They just dismissed a huge states vs states case which they have sole jurisdiction on, why do people think they’ll react differently to some private lawyers filing lawsuits, they will never see the evidence because they’re already compromised/cucked
While I’m no fan of Mitch, I don’t think it’s within his power to add KY to the suit. I could be wrong on that.
Not with that attitude you Nancy boy.
Why so emotional? Maybe try out Tik Tok.
What the Supreme Court is saying by not taking the case is the remedy for this situation is in the state legislatures. Why should the Supreme Court jump into a fight that can be won in the state legislatures? It's the state legislatures that are the feckless morons, not the Supreme Court. However, the door is still open for a case to make it to the Supreme Court if the complaint is made by one who has been injured or has had their civil rights violated.
SCOUTS has already signaled very loudly that they are too coward to deal with it. If you want remedy, we need to secede.
LOL look Powell is talking a big game yet again! Will this be Biblical? Maybe this is the Kraken! Maybe the fictional server raid will rear its head again!
It will be thrown out completely.
The last box is calling.
You still have faith in the court system? Fuck that shit!
blah blah blah
She's a grifter, nothing more. Same as Wood. I will eat my spoon if I am wrong.
A grifter that got Flynn off the hook? A grifter that prosecuted dirty prosecuters? You're just parroting others who know nothing about her and can't be bothered to look it up. Have you read any of her filings? No, because it's easier to just disparage someone who hasn't made you feel all warm and fuzzy when you wanted it.
She didn't, Potus had to pardon him.
You're fucking clueless.
Oh point where i'm wrong asshat. The case was still going on and Trump had to pardon him. I'm not saying Sydney did a bad job, but the case was STILL GOING.
It was NOT still going, fuckhead. One rogue, Trump-hating judge was making a fool of himself with silly moves after ALL CHARGES DROPPED. But keep posting. Your ignorance is on full display.
holy shit retard. Trump would not have had to pardon him if the case was not still going on.
He was headed to prison, Powell broke the case.
The only reason Trump pardoned Flynn is because the Judge refused to drop the case despite the prosecutor dropping it.
because the corrupt judge wanted flynn in jail so bad he started acting as a prosecutor after the DOJ dropped the case.
glow harder fag
WELL GET READY TO SHIT A SPOON
Couldn't have said it better myself. And I'm a big fan of the word "faggot".
Nobody cares handshake fag.
Because you back it up with nothing. Piss off, Doomer fag. Buy a fucking clue somewhere.
This is a non-answer. Just like a libtard. No citations, no facts. Just diahrea of the mouth. Pretty sure you're a shill.
You never had any . That’s your problem. This is literally Good vs Evil man.
Oh? Name one thing she's lied about.