If you mean people like me who are warning against making domestic terrorist threats on a public forum, well, then yes, I'm a shill doomer commie faggot zionist.
But seriously the BS needs to stop. What we need is a cohesive plan forward, that's lawful and legal, stop using media platforms that screw us over and over again (anyone still using youtube, facebook, youtube, insta, etc... there are plenty of alternatives!!!) , and good optics for our comms to rally everyone to the cause.
Saying things that on the other hand amount to calls to murder will lead to one thing: a lone wolf with a bit less IQ than the rest of us will commit a horrible crime, and it will change nothing but make us look bad and demonize us further.
I am also confused why they do that. They could just al jump to gab. They have a captive audience anyways - we'd follow them wherever they post. They could post on both as well, just to be safe. There are so many ways to approach this. They could for example post on both, and when they publicize the tweet side of things, link to nitter (example: http://nitter.net/LLinWood/status/1332751026156396544) so that twitter doesn't get advertiser money.
Yes, no one should be making terroristic threats. But at the same time, telling people to calm down and trust the system is a terrible idea. People on the right were calm and trusting of the system for decades, and that's how we ended up with George w Bush and mitt Romney as presidents and candidates. Don't calm down, be prepared to do it has to be done too overturn this fraudulent election, and also save our country from communism.
You are asking for people to stay confident where there hasn't been any good news for weeks. And the electoral college votes in 2 days. What exactly do you want people to be confident about?
Well lets see, democrats support CCP which has concentration camps. Dems support forcing their will on others, they support looting/rioting, they hide and help child rapists get away, but sure, they have people who call themselves Christians...
Not sure why you are trying to debate me on this question, if you are interested in scripture and want to figure out what Christians suppose to follow, by all means go for it mate.
My point is that intermingling politics and religion is retarded as hell. Saying that God is on your side doesn't mean anything because religion trascends all of these modern day issues.
If you have noticed, I was not talking about Democrats as in just politics, I was talking about their moral actions, or rather immoral actions, it is not simply Democrat = automatically bad Republican = automatically good. By the way, many of us here are not Republicans to begin with just as an FYI.
Not trolling, genuinely asking. If you are going to introduce religion into politics then you have to consider the possibility that the lord actually is taking sides with the opposition.
If you mean people like me who are warning against making domestic terrorist threats on a public forum, well, then yes, I'm a shill doomer commie faggot zionist.
But seriously the BS needs to stop. What we need is a cohesive plan forward, that's lawful and legal, stop using media platforms that screw us over and over again (anyone still using youtube, facebook, youtube, insta, etc... there are plenty of alternatives!!!) , and good optics for our comms to rally everyone to the cause.
Saying things that on the other hand amount to calls to murder will lead to one thing: a lone wolf with a bit less IQ than the rest of us will commit a horrible crime, and it will change nothing but make us look bad and demonize us further.
Agreed!
I am also confused why they do that. They could just al jump to gab. They have a captive audience anyways - we'd follow them wherever they post. They could post on both as well, just to be safe. There are so many ways to approach this. They could for example post on both, and when they publicize the tweet side of things, link to nitter (example: http://nitter.net/LLinWood/status/1332751026156396544) so that twitter doesn't get advertiser money.
"If God is for us, who can be against us?"
And whats your point?
Lol.
CCP agents are not needed when the US SC does all the work for them.
Yes, no one should be making terroristic threats. But at the same time, telling people to calm down and trust the system is a terrible idea. People on the right were calm and trusting of the system for decades, and that's how we ended up with George w Bush and mitt Romney as presidents and candidates. Don't calm down, be prepared to do it has to be done too overturn this fraudulent election, and also save our country from communism.
You are asking for people to stay confident where there hasn't been any good news for weeks. And the electoral college votes in 2 days. What exactly do you want people to be confident about?
So there's no Christians on the Democrat side? Is Jesus a republican?
Well lets see, democrats support CCP which has concentration camps. Dems support forcing their will on others, they support looting/rioting, they hide and help child rapists get away, but sure, they have people who call themselves Christians...
Are christians allowed to judge if other christians are real christians?
Not sure why you are trying to debate me on this question, if you are interested in scripture and want to figure out what Christians suppose to follow, by all means go for it mate.
My point is that intermingling politics and religion is retarded as hell. Saying that God is on your side doesn't mean anything because religion trascends all of these modern day issues.
If you have noticed, I was not talking about Democrats as in just politics, I was talking about their moral actions, or rather immoral actions, it is not simply Democrat = automatically bad Republican = automatically good. By the way, many of us here are not Republicans to begin with just as an FYI.
Is God political?
But what if God's plan was for Biden to win?
Not trolling, genuinely asking. If you are going to introduce religion into politics then you have to consider the possibility that the lord actually is taking sides with the opposition.