11
posted ago by LockedandLoaded ago by LockedandLoaded +11 / -0

My friends,

As an attorney, I’m just throwing this out there. We can all file, Pro Se, lawsuits with SCOTUS. Use his arguments as a template. Google the Judicial requirements for standing. We all have standing because we were all harmed by the Defendant States as our legal votes were all diluted by the fraud allowed to occur due to their violation of both the Electors Clause and Equal Protection Clause.

Google or find a Writ of Certiorari and copy it with your arguments that they should hear your case as best you can. It doesn’t have to be elegant legalese.

We could all file these things on our own. Certainly they would be denied, but the very action of doing so would speak volumes. It could be done in a matter of hours. Even if they didn’t docket it, their offices would be flooded with thousands of lawsuits that show how serious we are and how disenfranchised, upset and in righteous anger over what they did today.

I will be attempting to do so and simply use the Wood lawsuit as a guide to draft my own and a Writ for Cert.

You can file a lawsuit against anyone in any court and at any time. It doesn’t matter if it’s lacks complete standing or merit in this case because the objective would be to show how many Americans are pissed off and it would flood the SCOTUS chambers with filings they would at least have to look at, see that they are coming from thousands of citizens Pro Se and demonstrate and show our anger and frustration over their ruling today. Which was complete bullshit, Texas absolutely had standing.

This is an avenue we could all take. The lawsuits, of course, would all be denied, but they would at least have to see them or be aware of them to some degree, especially if the volume was high enough. Imagine thousands of lawsuits filed over the next few days pouring into their Chambers and showing them in a peaceful manner that we are pissed. They would dismiss them all surely, but they would see that American Citizens are filing Pro Se on the same grounds as Texas. Further, we could draft them in a way that shits all over SCOTUS. Don’t curse them out but tell them they are spineless cowards. Pro Se Citizens don’t have to follow the unwritten rule of legalese in filing these. It would be a peaceful tool to express our anger and a way to damningly call out SCOTUS.

Use the Wood filing as a template and replicate his legal arguments for standing as a individual and harm he suffered as such individual by the violation of the Constitution of the Defendant States. Draft the rest as well as you can and then file it.

As Prosecutors like to say, “you can indict a ham sandwich for murder, but it the case won’t be heard” however, the court would still have to look at the lawsuit and then dismiss a lawsuit against a ham sandwich.

IMO, this is at least worth a shot and we have the weekend to do it. Hell, even if you can’t figure out how to file it just mail it to the SCOTUS building.

Comments (14)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
1
pepsee 1 point ago +1 / -0

I appealed a case to the U.S. Supreme Court a couple of years ago. They ultimately declined to hear it (as they do with 99% of cases filed each term), but along with my petition, I had to pay a $300 "docket fee".

You might be able to avoid this if you file "in forma pauperis", basically stating that you can't afford the filing fee, but there are specific guidelines for that. The process of filing something in the U.S. Supreme Court is not a simple copy/paste. You would have to read up on the requirements and follow them to the letter, otherwise, your filing will be rejected without the judges seeing anything.

For example, you have to make a bunch of copies (obviously one for each member of the court, plus extras that they keep on file) and there are very specific formatting requirements you have to follow.

See: https://www.supremecourt.gov/filingandrules/rules_guidance.aspx

Personally, I'd suggest avoiding doing what OP suggests. I understand those initial feelings of utter desperation/frustration but please keep in mind that there are several legitimate challenges heading down the pipe to the Supreme Court. Time is our enemy. Anything we do that slows their system down works against us. We want to leave the path as smooth as possible so future challenges can be heard that much more quickly.

Don't gum up the works!

1
LockedandLoaded [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

I mean I didn’t say copy and paste. I said use it as an example to build from.

Yeah read up on the filing requirements. That’s implied in the process of filing the lawsuit and easily discoverable as you found the link quite quickly.

As far as the other cases, what makes you think SCOTUS gives a damn about any of those? Those cases are about fraud. SCOTUS isn’t gonna touch a case about election fraud unless it’s 200% air tight. Especially the Roberts Court.

Gumming up the works? As I said they would briefly see them and toss them out but they would see them nonetheless..

We are on the brink of Civil War. I’d rather attempt this route than have to turn on fellow Americans.

SCOTUS won’t hear a single case on this election. That is clear as day now. Idgaf what you think about these other lawsuits. Texas has CLEAR standing and they punted. Peaceful options run low. I was just trying to think of a potential message sender.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0