8864
Comments (1994)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
6
Lovepede 6 points ago +33 / -27

From what I gathered from lawyer pede, there's no injury until the defendant states have presented their electors to the federal government on a fraudulent basis. Ie nobody's been hurt yet. Presumably the lawsuit can be re-filed or become relevant again once the states put forward their fake electors.

100
deleted 100 points ago +104 / -4
48
SpookySpook 48 points ago +51 / -3

Yeah

you cant sue before fraud occurs

*you should have sued before fraud occurred *

6
deleted 6 points ago +13 / -7
11
CloudIX 11 points ago +13 / -2

The Texas lawsuit wasn't alleging fraud dum dum. It said the states changed their election laws without the legislature which violated the constitution.

2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
3
BoneDustCrew 3 points ago +4 / -1

The game was rigged from the start.

6
BasteSpuds 6 points ago +7 / -1

Hopium

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
59
deleted 59 points ago +63 / -4
45
deleted 45 points ago +48 / -3
23
deleted 23 points ago +25 / -2
16
JackLemon 16 points ago +17 / -1

No, make no mistake they knew they're just cowards and some of them are pure evil.

6
Italians_Invented_2A 6 points ago +7 / -1

They knew we are cowards.

If we were BLM we would have burned the building already

-5
deleted -5 points ago +1 / -6
7
wholesomekangz100 7 points ago +8 / -1

Lot of handshakes out here today spouting leftist bs.

7
deleted 7 points ago +8 / -1
6
deleted 6 points ago +7 / -1
5
Italians_Invented_2A 5 points ago +5 / -0

They said Texas did not demonstrate that it was injured by the unconstitutional acts of other states. Ridiculous.

Yes it is absolutely ridiculous. The standard for standing should be extremely low, because SCOTUS entire reason to exist is to analyze constitutional questions.

They should have analyzed the problem that Texas poses even if no-one complained. That's their fucking job

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
-4
deleted -4 points ago +7 / -11
16
MadMaxUSMC 16 points ago +17 / -1

Right? Just like Elections MUST have observers and ballots MUST be in by a certain date and time? If you don't care about the law than Must doesn't mean much.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
8
deleted 8 points ago +9 / -1
0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
28
deleted 28 points ago +31 / -3
16
Anaconda 16 points ago +19 / -3

fuck mark levin. instead of shitting on those 5 cuckservative backstabbers tonight all he did was talk about the media and the china virus crap

4
DontArkancideMeBro 4 points ago +6 / -2

He is in favor of the Convention of States, where we can open up the Constitution and change it. The John Birch Society is correct that we should NOT open Pandora’s box, just because there are more republican states. JBS is right. Just look at Georgia, just look at all the Rhinos. There is nothing wrong with the Constitution, we just need to freaking follow it! That said, I’m not going scorched earth on Mark. I don’t think that he is controlled opposition. Time will tell my guy. Time will tell.

3
FormerGraveheart 3 points ago +3 / -0

And what good would changing the constitution do when SCOTUS just wipes their asses with it?

0
MoldyLocksNesMonste 0 points ago +1 / -1

Is Levin on Fox?

-2
DontArkancideMeBro -2 points ago +3 / -5

And also- Alito and Thomas dissented, meaning they wanted to hear the case from Texas. They have both been great patriots in our Republic.

10
deleted 10 points ago +12 / -2
5
deleted 5 points ago +6 / -1
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
19
Anaconda 19 points ago +22 / -3

you 'trust the plan' retards should be banned from here. next you will say 4 years of biden/harris is all part of the plan and this is how trump and MAGA is winning!!!

2
SleepingDragon4444 2 points ago +3 / -1

Who is saying that? What do you want people to do?

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0