8864
Comments (1994)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
5
BoneDustCrew 5 points ago +7 / -2

how?! that was a blatant act of betrayl!

9
thelastlast 9 points ago +11 / -2

the legal decision made openly little sense.

they said they weren't designed to take the case. the reason they used was an Article that literally says they were designed to take the case.

it just openly makes no sense, it's like a message. that's the only rationalization I have for it.

7
BoneDustCrew 7 points ago +7 / -0

you ask me, they blatantly don't care. we stand alone.

-3
deleted -3 points ago +1 / -4
2
thelastlast 2 points ago +2 / -0

what with the Hopium?

yeah you might be right. it's just, why would they claim the exact opposite of what the law says, and then reference that law?