8864
Comments (1994)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
-3
Wexit-Delecto -3 points ago +7 / -10

That would have been trading one banker backed evil (commies) for another (nazis).

Yes, the globalist bankers backed them too. Check out wall street support for nazis, especially in 1933, or Prescott Bush. Don’t forget Smedley Butler!

The bankers also supported Mussolini and other fascists. They even had a fascist movement in Canada which is related to todays’ Liberal Party! They pumped funds into communists and fascists, polarized most of the world, and then let loose.

How many millions of American, German, Russian, Japanese, and other patriots were culled?

How many globalist banker interests were harmed? Who immediately began dictating global financial rules, paperclipping and working alongside the nazis with whom they supposedly shared a mutual hatred, writing history (for example, we never saw the death camps, they were all behind the iron curtain, so we only had Ivan’s word on it), and enjoying the spoils of war, if not the globalist bankers? And who lost?

10
WesternRefugee 10 points ago +11 / -1

I think it’s important that we remember why that generation fought and died in WW2. For trans kids, of course. If an after life exists, and they can see the world they created, do you think they would regret their decisions?

1
Wexit-Delecto 1 point ago +1 / -0

The false dichotomy in your post is that we must be nazis to oppose degeneracy.

If our brave forefathers fought instead for the nazis, they’d have been equally dismayed to see the bankers win.

Seriously, did you look up Prescott Bush’s support for the nazis? Do you suppose Prescott was a rebel in the Bush family? Do you suppose GW and friends spit on his grave for having supported the supposedly anti-globalist nazis?

(((They))) always control both sides.