They don't dismiss cases because they don't want to "look at the evidence," they dismiss cases because they follow the law and the law is technical. If you don't have standing, to hear your case would be illegal.
So explain the revote dems got in North Carolina with just the undervote statistic.
Its a two tiered system where left wing judges bend the law to favor their fellow travelers. While right wingers have to do crowd sourced research funded by average americans only to get dismissed over latches and standing.
I'm not a lawyer. But looking at events as an intelligent layperson I see a pattern of every election-related lawsuit getting dismissed out of every court for technical reasons.
Are the Trump legal team and the other lawyers filling these suits completely inept?
Or has the law been structured in such a way that judges can always find a technical reason to dismiss any suit without hearing the evidence?
I'm rapidly coming to the conclusion that the "the law" is being deliberately used to deny justice. And that this can be done in a case where the literal foundations of our republic are at risk is terrifying.
SPEZ: But you are brave to post your reply knowing how unpopular it would be.
They don't dismiss cases because they don't want to "look at the evidence," they dismiss cases because they follow the law and the law is technical. If you don't have standing, to hear your case would be illegal.
Except standing is a concept made up relatively recently and has no basis
So explain the revote dems got in North Carolina with just the undervote statistic.
Its a two tiered system where left wing judges bend the law to favor their fellow travelers. While right wingers have to do crowd sourced research funded by average americans only to get dismissed over latches and standing.
You will never be a woman.
Your gaping wound stinks dude. Go back to reddit.
Idiot
I'm not a lawyer. But looking at events as an intelligent layperson I see a pattern of every election-related lawsuit getting dismissed out of every court for technical reasons.
Are the Trump legal team and the other lawyers filling these suits completely inept?
Or has the law been structured in such a way that judges can always find a technical reason to dismiss any suit without hearing the evidence?
I'm rapidly coming to the conclusion that the "the law" is being deliberately used to deny justice. And that this can be done in a case where the literal foundations of our republic are at risk is terrifying.
SPEZ: But you are brave to post your reply knowing how unpopular it would be.
Can you expand on this? What judge has looked at evidence and judged based on it?