I imagine the window between sending electors, and the electors voting, will be small. So, best that this case be brought by a party with standing (in the eyes of SCOTUS). Thanks.
Then it will be “well yeah, we let the pedothief be inaugurated, but so far he’s only been sniffing kids, so you really haven’t been harmed”
“Well yeah, premier Harris, the first of her name, is sending you to the gulag, but your thinking really was wrong, and you haven’t been re-educated yet so you haven’t been harmed.”
Are you fucking high? That will never happen no way not in a million years. You seriously need to come back to reality man. They won't vote for Trump even if they had mountains of irrefutable evidence of fraud.
I imagine the window between sending electors, and the electors voting, will be small. So, best that this case be brought by a party with standing (in the eyes of SCOTUS). Thanks.
Texas has standing though
scotus position is bullshit
Yeah dude
And then Scotus will say “they are not inaugurated yet so you havent been harmed”
this poster has a stupid, fake argument
Then it will be “well yeah, we let the pedothief be inaugurated, but so far he’s only been sniffing kids, so you really haven’t been harmed”
“Well yeah, premier Harris, the first of her name, is sending you to the gulag, but your thinking really was wrong, and you haven’t been re-educated yet so you haven’t been harmed.”
Ad infinitum.
yep
If that’s TL we got some lazy pedes on this site; excellent post
Are you fucking high? That will never happen no way not in a million years. You seriously need to come back to reality man. They won't vote for Trump even if they had mountains of irrefutable evidence of fraud.
If the electors have already cast their votes, is it possible (without recourse to war) to undo the vote once done?
Yes. When the votes are counted in January. I believe that's happened at least once when Nixon was VP. But that's really far fetched.
Don't they vote on monday?