435 () posted 126 days ago by BellmawrBlake 126 days ago by BellmawrBlake +438 / -3 85 comments share 85 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (85) sorted by: top new old worst You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread. ▲ 14 ▼ – thelastlast 14 points 126 days ago +14 / -0 hm. well that's not a bad point about referencing all of Article III. but they specifically referenced it as a reason they didn't have standing. which is the mind-boggling opposite of what it says in Section 2. but I dont know I will take any explanation for that truly bizarre ruling. permalink save report block reply ▲ 3 ▼ – deleted 3 points 126 days ago +3 / -0
hm. well that's not a bad point about referencing all of Article III.
but they specifically referenced it as a reason they didn't have standing. which is the mind-boggling opposite of what it says in Section 2.
but I dont know I will take any explanation for that truly bizarre ruling.