I cannot be very specific because I have started recently working with a team of programmers among other I.T people on reverse engineering that is NOT officially affiliated with DJT’s campaign or lawyers. I’ll drop a hint that I’m primarily working in Michigan and somewhat Georgia remotely.
That out of the way, just some inside chatter I have gotten after seeing the outcome of SCOTUS and being very disheartened- this Texas lawsuit was not expected or planned, but was welcomed. When I say expected or planned, there have been many things set in motion from over two years ago, this was not one of them. No one had preconceived opinions on its outcome, but welcomed the show of support that was not previously present.
The outcome to the few people who are relevant to any of you was definitely slightly depressing (just that the fight may be over), but not a blow in the least to the ongoing efforts.
If you would, please look into Trump’s EO a bit more and SPECIFICALLY, look at the required positions mentioned in the EO, and cross check them with who Trump has recently fired and who he has replaced them with. Any lawyer will tell you this EO is extremely well written.
The question many of you may ask is (like myself), why hasn’t Trump just gone directly to the EO? Mostly because the EO you can think of as the nuclear option, and if you’re intelligent you don’t start a war generally with the MOAB, you go in and see what you can do on the ground and gradually step up with resistance. And you need to prove to the people the MOAB is required.
Also, these state and local hearings allow three things, as Trump is basically blacklisted from all media, it ensures the public witness what Trump has witnessed for support of the people, this Texas lawsuit and the effort put into a lot of these small time hearings everyone knew would be shot down can be used to disperse information to the public and secondly, find the roots of corruption to pull from America’s soil with the EO. Lastly, the growing frustration of the populace is seen as a giant help.
Take this with a giant grain of salt as these people are not right next to Trump, but they were happy to see the non-Trump appointments in Alito and Thomas were at least willing to hear this case when it had MANY flaws.
The top down opinion on ACB and Kavanaugh, the two most seem the most surprised with is, they don’t want the appearance of impropriety at any cost (this includes Gorsuch who I don’t see much about), and that puts things into jeopardy. That is why they didn’t join Alito and Thomas. However, they are still confident with the PLANNED lawsuits heading to the Supreme Court, as they are based very fundamentally in the constitution which ACB is a dedicated student of, that it will win. The TX lawsuit dismissal is also seen as a giant gift to the primary Trump lawsuits as it is seen as an “out” for ACB, Gorsuch, and Kavanaugh to show they aren’t blindly helping Trump, they are trying cases based on their merit. Roberts..anyway,
To wrap this up, Flynn has a lot more involvement than many of you think, I would recommend listening to him more.
And lastly, Trump’s options are many, but the SC case is the last before the EO, December 18th is also not its intended date of execution. ACB is currently looked at as she’ll call it down the line (which is good), Kavanaugh will most likely side with Trump this next go around, Gorsuch as well, and Alito and Thomas are basically locks. Roberts, uh, he’s with Barr at KFC.
I leave you with this: Michigan is the key, and there’s very, VERY good reason why that judge doesn’t want you to know what was discovered. Remember the testimony of owners in Dominion being in Michigan- didn’t hear that elsewhere (for good reason). Also a delay tactic to stop it from reaching SCOTUS. It’s extremely important to say the least. If you think you’ve seen the smoking gun, if we can get the findings out of Michigan, it will all blow all your lids off. Sheryl Guy isn’t happy.
I would, the only thing is we are not done completely on the most pivotal part, which is when the judge stepped in. We are still working because we have the data. When it’s completed I absolutely will even under any legal issue.
Hypothetically I can say though, and I have to be purposefully base here, say you had a voting machine that you were able to reverse engineer to get its source code, and were able to replicate the machine on a local network and internet connected network, I cannot say the methodology exactly, but say you put 50 Trump marked ballots in, and 50 Biden marked ballots in, and a server churns out a Biden win with a statistical significance to several other states (say maybe in the range of 2%?).
Take great note on the “glitches” (the 6000 vote “oopsie”).
I can say this because it’s vague enough to also shed some light, there’s a reason recounts, auditing, etc, really find nothing.
Literally, if you’ve seen the office the movie, and remember the “penny scheme”? Our friends maybe took the movie too literally. And flash drives I guess were on sale on Nov. 2nd.
What do you think of this: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1TSN18YRIb0_q5MBNO8RUdRExTCXLl_b7/view is this explicable by your findings?
Who did this? I’d love to have their contact information to forward it to the team.
But yes, just to be clear, I am solely focused on 2 ballot machine companies (well they’re basically one) software, but I can say some of the findings are wrong, as far as focusing on urban strongholds.
We have found the same source code implemented on EVERY machine. Other than that, his math is statistically flawless. He is correct on the urban stronghold idea in a different way which I will get to.
To make this extremely simple so that it doesn’t take 20 paragraphs to dictate, these machines themselves are benign, however, the servers are where the data manipulation resides, and I can confirm we have a mirror of the domestic server.
What basically occurred was, without getting into fractional voting, is for every batch, which commonly are 50 votes, Biden would receive 2.6% more than Trump, if you were to run 25 ballots for Trump and 25 for Biden, thus for every batch Biden would receive 26.3, Trump would get 23.7. If you change these states votes by 2.6% overall, most states Trump would win.
Now, when this did not work in these states to out perform Trump, and this is outside my scope of what I’m doing but I am in the loop, there were “dumps” of ballots put on top.
These dumps are being forensically analyzed of origin (thus far I have heard the Middle East to actually be the source of most, Kazakhstan and Iran being the big two, that does not mean the operators actually were in the Middle East also) but as this author described, absolutely impossible statistically to occur.
This is why for instance, if you look back at the “glitches,” for instance the 6000 in Michigan, the server simply dropped these ballots into the wrong county. We may have proof of this. I’m not saying that to be “wink wink,” we have a company working on retrieving these servers data as they were scrubbed, but we can already prove statistically and also comparing votes to voter turn out it’s completely bogus.
Who mirrored the domestic server? Doesn’t appear to be any agencies on our side. DoD? The EO gave the power to do this? Because I don’t remember any suit where we gained access to servers. Hardware in Michigan yes but you said they’re benign. Lots of questions. Good info though.