90% of jobs are modernized slavery, exceptions are Truckers, HVAC, Electricians, stuff like that. Stuff where you can take your skill and make something of yourself, even if you were fired or let go. You can freelance.
Otherwise you're just making rich people richer and disposable. Worked for Blizzard Entertainment and this hit hard when i was "managed out" for voting Trump in 2016
If we don’t have any standing in the TX lawsuit pertaining to federal election fraud in our United States, THEN I WANT A UNION WHERE WE DO HAVE STANDING.
Michigan bringing back slavery doesn’t effect Texas. (No injury)
On the other hand, the TX lawsuit argues the elected VP effects it’s power by changing its congressional influence since the VP becomes the tie breaking vote. Sounds like an injury to me. (Granted the electors haven’t voted and the VP hasn’t shifted)
It would effect Texas in a multitude of ways, Interstate commerce for one. Personal property laws etc. If Oklahoma was polluting a river that flowed into Texas Texas has Standing, but not when their votes are stolen. Makes no sense. But hey, that's the point of most Laws isn't it.
It depends. Is the plaintiff a leftist democrat? Apparently that's the litmus test for whether or not justice in court functions or not.
Rino capitalism is the same as democrat socialism.
And they're dumb enough to do it again in 4 years.
Slavery never ended. If you ever worked retail you'd know that.
90% of jobs are modernized slavery, exceptions are Truckers, HVAC, Electricians, stuff like that. Stuff where you can take your skill and make something of yourself, even if you were fired or let go. You can freelance.
Otherwise you're just making rich people richer and disposable. Worked for Blizzard Entertainment and this hit hard when i was "managed out" for voting Trump in 2016
Feels man. Blizzard used to stand for something good.
Amazon fulfillment canters
If we don’t have any standing in the TX lawsuit pertaining to federal election fraud in our United States, THEN I WANT A UNION WHERE WE DO HAVE STANDING.
NO STANDING. NO UNITED STATES.
nice point
That’s actually a point in favor of SCOTUS.
Michigan bringing back slavery doesn’t effect Texas. (No injury)
On the other hand, the TX lawsuit argues the elected VP effects it’s power by changing its congressional influence since the VP becomes the tie breaking vote. Sounds like an injury to me. (Granted the electors haven’t voted and the VP hasn’t shifted)
It would effect Texas in a multitude of ways, Interstate commerce for one. Personal property laws etc. If Oklahoma was polluting a river that flowed into Texas Texas has Standing, but not when their votes are stolen. Makes no sense. But hey, that's the point of most Laws isn't it.