5439
Comments (222)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
387
Phrazel 387 points ago +388 / -1

they literally changed their policy so they could do just this.

Scum

209
AnointedVisions 209 points ago +209 / -0

I told people a couple years ago that every site was going to be doing exactly what reddit was doing.

Now they all follow the same example. Reddit was a testing chamber for the future of all online censorship

25
thetruthfl 25 points ago +25 / -0

Reddit is a censoring left wing cesspool.

10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
2
Lrddiablo 2 points ago +3 / -1

its all about building a social credit system here in the states. get banned on FB will cause shit you have signed up through facebook/google to also get banned. this is what its all about

98
MAGA_Flocka_Flame 98 points ago +98 / -0

Crowder had an interesting take on this:

You can say you think Trump won or you can say there was fraud but you cannot say both

This provides a controlled opposition where Vox, CNN, etc can have footage where people are saying “I think Trump won” and they would retort that they don’t have evidence and paint them as inconsistent

That’s because any evidence that is shown in relation to the claim is automatically removed

25
drdespinz 25 points ago +26 / -1

But you can also say Trump lost or there wasn't fraud or that Trump won and there wasn't fraud, or that Trump won or that there was or wasn't fraud.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
22
Red_Shifts_Matter 22 points ago +22 / -0

It actually wasn't Crowder having a take on it. Tim Pool spoke directly to people at YouTube who gave him that information and then he tweeted it out. Crowder was reading the information directly from Tim's tweets.

Those are words right from YouTube employee's mouths. Let's see if they stand by them or let them slip more and more. My bet is on the latter.

I'm guessing that much like any of their rules, this will be applied selectively. They don't need to give big media loopholes because the rules never applied to them to begin with.

15
networkingkyle 15 points ago +15 / -0

I’m done using YouTube. I officially will no longer use their services. Google is dead to me also after seeing their blatant search manipulation I will never use them again.

11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
7
BillDStrong 7 points ago +7 / -0

He was pointing out Crowder's analysis, which Tim Pool didn't do.

2
Red_Shifts_Matter 2 points ago +2 / -0

Pretty sure I covered that in the last paragraph.

2
alucard13mmfmj 2 points ago +2 / -0

That is very damning in them curating content and controlling info... need trump team to know about this once the dust settles and we get 4 more years. Its just more evidence to use against social media.

50
deleted 50 points ago +50 / -0
10
Infidel440 10 points ago +10 / -0

They will all pay under the 2018 executive order.

5
ChuckedBeef 5 points ago +5 / -0

Big tech and media are easy soft targets. The people who have been manipulating them know this. They are sacrificial lambs.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
19
SvixGale 19 points ago +20 / -1

A) OP: WTF do you mean “it BEGINS”??? This has been going on for years, but has objectively intensified since well before the coup on 11/3.

B) The YouTube shooter didn’t go far enough.

6
jeffreyepstein 6 points ago +7 / -1

You had me till B

4
Mashiki 4 points ago +4 / -0

There's a reason she's got a shrine outside of YT's HQ.

1
SvixGale 1 point ago +1 / -0

You think there should be zero consequences for literally being digital book burners and for literally taking concrete, tangible, objectively verifiable (BY THEIR OWN FUCKING ADMISSIONS & DATA) to sway votes and impact elections?

We should just vote harder next time? Post videos more often soon as they are deleted, get banned 40 times, come back a 41st time? WTF? Please tell me your plan & YOUR solution. These aren't just assclowns deleting YouTube videos; ALL the social media companies are acutely aware of how much sway and impact they have on people's opinions, votes, and elections. They are by any definition of the phrase "interfering in our elections" in an EXTREMELY material way.

1
SvixGale 1 point ago +1 / -0

Kinda like those 5 swing states changed their laws just in time for the 2020 election, to impact how ballots were counted, huh?