5439
Comments (222)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
98
MAGA_Flocka_Flame 98 points ago +98 / -0

Crowder had an interesting take on this:

You can say you think Trump won or you can say there was fraud but you cannot say both

This provides a controlled opposition where Vox, CNN, etc can have footage where people are saying “I think Trump won” and they would retort that they don’t have evidence and paint them as inconsistent

That’s because any evidence that is shown in relation to the claim is automatically removed

25
drdespinz 25 points ago +26 / -1

But you can also say Trump lost or there wasn't fraud or that Trump won and there wasn't fraud, or that Trump won or that there was or wasn't fraud.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
22
Red_Shifts_Matter 22 points ago +22 / -0

It actually wasn't Crowder having a take on it. Tim Pool spoke directly to people at YouTube who gave him that information and then he tweeted it out. Crowder was reading the information directly from Tim's tweets.

Those are words right from YouTube employee's mouths. Let's see if they stand by them or let them slip more and more. My bet is on the latter.

I'm guessing that much like any of their rules, this will be applied selectively. They don't need to give big media loopholes because the rules never applied to them to begin with.

15
networkingkyle 15 points ago +15 / -0

I’m done using YouTube. I officially will no longer use their services. Google is dead to me also after seeing their blatant search manipulation I will never use them again.

11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
3
Techrev 3 points ago +3 / -0

There used to be hundreds of different search engines, all giving different results with different algorithms. Now? Everything just front ends the same one. There are a couple out there, like Bing, but for the most part even they follow the same rules.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
7
NedTugent 7 points ago +7 / -0

Well, I use DuckDuckGo as my default search engine on my phone, iPads and MacBook. Works fine. As for YouTube, I spend a lot of time on there watching people like Pool, car repair videos and music production videos (yes, I am a musician and artist, and would be considered an odd duck since I'm a Trump supporter), but I run adblocker and NEVER see ads, which is how they survive. I was spending upwards of $500/mo for Google services such as AdWords and YouTube TV but stopped that nonsense during the summer. I have a real problem with my money going into the pockets of people who want to destroy my livelihood. I also haven't set foot in a Target or Guitar Center since April because of their BLM woke garbage. The only thing I'm hooked on is Amazon since they've made it too easy to buy a bunch of crap at once and it's here tomorrow. I really need to wean myself away from Amazon.

2
zzyzzx 2 points ago +2 / -0

Brave browser will do the same. No app required.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
7
BillDStrong 7 points ago +7 / -0

He was pointing out Crowder's analysis, which Tim Pool didn't do.

2
Red_Shifts_Matter 2 points ago +2 / -0

Pretty sure I covered that in the last paragraph.

1
BillDStrong 1 point ago +1 / -0

No, you didn't. Your whole post discredits Crowder's part.

2
alucard13mmfmj 2 points ago +2 / -0

That is very damning in them curating content and controlling info... need trump team to know about this once the dust settles and we get 4 more years. Its just more evidence to use against social media.