117 FYI, the ONUS is not on us to prove election fraud, but on those who administrate the system to prove that they are trustworthy. posted 126 days ago by defiant_liberty 126 days ago by defiant_liberty +117 / -0 They have Failed! 6 comments share 6 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (6) sorted by: top new old worst ▲ 4 ▼ – deleted 4 points 126 days ago +4 / -0 ▲ 3 ▼ – manmadegod 3 points 126 days ago +3 / -0 Yes, but it doesn't change what must be done to secure freedom and the republic. permalink save report block reply ▲ 2 ▼ – defiant_liberty [S] 2 points 126 days ago +2 / -0 Unfortunately, if we can't get redress through the election process, and we can't get it through the courts, then the only option left is secession. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 2 ▼ – freefolk 2 points 126 days ago +2 / -0 We can't get 20 people to stop buying Chinese crap from Walmart. How are we going to get 150 million people to secede? permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – manmadegod 1 point 126 days ago +1 / -0 or conquest. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 2 ▼ – jdog 2 points 126 days ago +2 / -0 This is actually the problem. The responsibility should be on the election officials to prove their was no fraud instead of on everyone else to prove there was. It doesn't seem to be like that. Which means there was fraud. permalink save report block reply
Yes, but it doesn't change what must be done to secure freedom and the republic.
Unfortunately, if we can't get redress through the election process, and we can't get it through the courts, then the only option left is secession.
We can't get 20 people to stop buying Chinese crap from Walmart. How are we going to get 150 million people to secede?
or conquest.
This is actually the problem. The responsibility should be on the election officials to prove their was no fraud instead of on everyone else to prove there was. It doesn't seem to be like that. Which means there was fraud.