I know there have been several posts in here criticizing how the lawyers are saying “overturn” the election. I agree - it’s a bad phrase. No judge wants to draw the ire of the left for “overturning” the election. In the coming days the legal strategy is not the only one that matters. Like it or not, court of public opinion is going to become a factor in this. The legal teams and pundits on our side need a new way of explaining this. I personally think the word “restore” is better a better choice than overturn.
They could say something like, “We are asking judges to do the right thing and restore integrity and lawfulness to a broken election so the valid winner, based on votes legally cast by registered voters, is sworn in in January 20th.”
Maybe there’s a better way than how I’m saying it. But we need to get the word up the chain to STOP USING OVERTURN!
Show me where anyone is suggesting this, all I see is demands for higher courts to look into possible fraud.
Sidney Powell says it every time I hear her speak. Giuliani has said it. I’ve heard Maria Bartiromo say it. These are all people on our side. And I know countless others have too. We need them to help change the narrative, not be managed by it.