6456
Comments (418)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
112
DefaultFreedom 112 points ago +114 / -2

He can appoint an interim without confirmation, and the clock is ticking...

43
Jcholl9 43 points ago +46 / -3

What Trump needs to do is an executive order to appoint Rudy as (AG) to act on this election fraud. And Barr can sit back and learn a thing or two?

48
TenScoops 48 points ago +50 / -2

no one's listening anymore, they all want him out and continue selling us out to commie fucks and China

36
deleted 36 points ago +37 / -1
15
FireannDireach 15 points ago +17 / -2

He doesn't have the power to do that. He can appoint Rudy as a temp AG, but that's it - and Rudy would need months to figure out who in the DOJ he can trust. He'd be in the belly of the beast - they'd leak everything he's doing, warn people, and stab him right in the back. We have weeks, that's it.

12
Jcholl9 12 points ago +13 / -1

Yes temp (AG) that is what I'm talking about and he won't need months to figure out who he can trust if he uses his own team for say...

1
Southasiangir1 1 point ago +2 / -1

^

4
bitterbut_true 4 points ago +4 / -0

That should have been done a year ago...

Except since the mid term frauds Trump's presidency has been hanging by a thread...his survival depended on probably 14 senators. He didn't want to put his fate into their hands unnecessarily. If Trump had sacked Barr they would have had the first impeachment early 202-- for "obstruction of justice" and Bill Barr as star witness against Trump.

1
FireannDireach 1 point ago +1 / -0

Could be. He got boxed in. He's still standing, which is almost a miracle.

1
AgnesDomini 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes, but he only needs to appoint Rudy G. to be a temp AG in order to have the AG file suit so that SCOTUS can hear the case in time to rule before January 20th. Read paragraphs 30-32 of "United States versus Throckmorton" decision on the Cornell University law library site https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/98/61

If he does a surprise, last minute switcheroo, and names Rudy G. as AG by Christmas, the 30 days from then covers up to Inauguration Day.

0
Endprism 0 points ago +1 / -1

Trust no one, fire everyone. Let the chips fall where they may. At this point scorched earth is the only viable solution we have left.

-1
WINNINGTIGER -1 points ago +1 / -2

No, we have hours. The Electoral College votes Monday. After that the President's political support will crater. The RINOS who have gritted their teeth and stayed in line will turn on him publicly. If he gives orders, they will be slow-played until Biden is inaugurated and then nullified. Come Monday, it's all over, unless POTUS or someone else does something about it.

6
RedBlooded 6 points ago +6 / -0

AG Barr is beyond learning. He should be locked in a prison cell, cut off from people for the rest of his life so he can contemplate how he could have been a better American... and not just him but this should happen to several other people too, but that goes without saying...

2
txladyvoter 2 points ago +2 / -0

forced to eat prison food

1
spezisacuckold 1 point ago +1 / -0

You say that as if that fat fuck wouldn't like free food.

3
PresidentErectHunter 3 points ago +4 / -1

If a special prosecutor is appointed, does it continue into Biden adninistration?

Assuming he is successful in stealing the Election.

12
FireannDireach 12 points ago +12 / -0

A special prosecutor can be fired day one of a Biden presidency.

1
Whirlybot 1 point ago +1 / -0

But isn't there enough info in public at this point to perform a real impeachment?

1
operation_eland 1 point ago +1 / -0

Maybe that is why they tried the impeachment thing - keep Rudy tied up with that so he couldn't be named AG.

20
Vivadiscordia 20 points ago +46 / -26

Ask yourself why none of the acting appointees stayed on. Matthew Whitaker as acting AG, Grenell as acting DNI, etc... Ask yourself why he didn’t simply appoint undoubtedly loyal individuals to all of these positions. Just think on it for a bit.

96
RonPaulWasRight 96 points ago +97 / -1

Why don't you just say what you are implying.

71
deleted 71 points ago +71 / -0
7
BoatingAccident 7 points ago +7 / -0

as is usually the case with edge lords.

24
deleted 24 points ago +24 / -0
7
Rreidy8286 7 points ago +7 / -0

Thank you. Im so sick of people trying to talk in riddles. Say what you mean and save us all the time.

2
RonPaulWasRight 2 points ago +2 / -0

Most of it stems from Q bullshit. TrUsT SeSsiOnS

41
ErmaMaggard 41 points ago +41 / -0

I'd rather you just come out and say it because I have no idea what you're getting at.

43
isellmacs2 43 points ago +44 / -1

Reread his point before that comment. The corrupt senate, deep staters of both parties, won't confirm anybody they can't control.

That's literally the reason why he didn't appoint loyalists as permanent people: the senate refused to confirm them. So if he wants somebody appointed he has to be somebody the senate will confirm.

Just look at his 3 SCOTUS picks. All of them cucked out on the Texas case. His AG, CIA, FBI etc. picks all are deepstate cucks. It looked like maybe Barr wouldn't be, but at this point nobody had confidence in him at all. He's delivered nothing.

The problem ultimately is we have too many establishment republicans. The cheating just confirms the system is heavily rigged, and that means any republicans who want to keep their position need to kneel to the establishment or be prepared for an epic fight with those who do... and all the democrats, media, big tech etc.

5
3stepsahead 5 points ago +5 / -0

I agree all Rinos need to go, but think about SCOTUS. Steps: They hear the case. They agree They rule in favor of the Prez. In 4 years states sue for no reason and it all starts again.

If SCOTUS took it up and denied relief then it's game over everywhere. Texas was a longshot. It makes sense to me to say you fuckers that's against the Constitution EAD. GO PREZ.....

Second: If WI. Rules against Trump today. It Goes to SCOTUS He wins. He has standing and WI. violated their state Constitution.

Thats what they're doing in PA., GA., AZ.,and WI.

Maybe they say fuck-all and thats it. Then we have a revolution to get behind boyz....

4
Vivadiscordia 4 points ago +4 / -0

Ding ding ding. I’m glad someone has a brain. Additionally, to answer why he doesn’t just constantly shuffle loyalists in acting roles, it’s one of two reasons, or both.

The first is that the underlings at whatever department won’t follow their orders. If there is anything that should be apparent after the last four years, it’s that these departments are rife with obstruction, insubordination, and leakers. Just look at how Gina Haspel has been refusing to declassify the documents that Trump ordered. Say he fired her and put someone else in, the underlings would probably refuse to provide the documents, and obstruct everything the new acting director does. The swamp protects its own. One might respond that these people should be charged for their criminal behavior and arrested, but guess what, the justice system is broken too!

The second reason is that they could be holding leverage over Trump’s head to keep him from shuffling acting directors. Could be threats against family. Not violent threats necessarily, but legal threats. Step out of line and we start prosecuting all your family members, bog down their businesses in litigation, destroy them financially.

2
Southern_Belle 2 points ago +3 / -1

The problem ultimately is we have too many establishment republicans.

Funny way to spell filthy commies.

2
ErmaMaggard 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thanks for explaining, and I agree with a lot of what you're saying.

2
AgnesDomini 2 points ago +2 / -0

They might not have cucked out on the Texas suit. Paragraphs 30-32 of "United States v. Throckmorton" decision specifically states that district attorneys don't have legal standing in certain types of cases, only the AG does. The merits of the case can be presented to the court, which will accept the case, if brought by an AG. Trump should fire Barr, put Rudy G. in place for 30 days---long enough to file and argue prior to Inauguration Day, without a confirmation---and SCOTUS would be upholding legal precedent by accepting the suit.

20
deleted 20 points ago +20 / -0
5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
9
Infidel440 9 points ago +14 / -5

Needs deep state players to expose themselves.

27
deleted 27 points ago +29 / -2
4
KristiNoemFaceFuck 4 points ago +4 / -0

There's not many that aren't deep state at this point.

3
MAGAChamp12 3 points ago +5 / -2

Lol there is no ‘appoint deep staters who sabotage my administration and agenda at every level of government to expose them as part of the master plan’ gig going on.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
1
ATOZED 1 point ago +3 / -2

I don't think thats what vivadi was getting at...but I agree with you deep state exposee theory in that if you are wrong we are all fucked

8
manowar 8 points ago +9 / -1

Yeah, break it down for us dimwhits

14
MoldyLocksNesMonste 14 points ago +14 / -0

He can appoint anyone he wants.

Whoever he appoints has to have people beneath him that will take orders and carry them out.

That has not happened to date.

12
DonJr2024 12 points ago +14 / -2

Yeah it's become clear that government is useless at best. Elected officials no longer control any of these 3 letter agencies, military, IRS, etc.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
4
jtt888 4 points ago +4 / -0

Obama loves the government. So naturally, those who work for government will love him.

3
whippeat 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yes, because they actually listened to him

And Obama did weaponize the IRS to go after conservatives, lol

For all the times CNN calls Trump a dictator, he has been extremely restrained

3
HangTheSwamp 3 points ago +3 / -0

Government employees tend to be left wing. Those are the people naturally drawn to government work. Not always, but the vast majority. Why do you think the DC area is so ridiculously democrat. They will do the bidding of someone like Obama, who they worship, but work against and even take part in a silent coup against Trump.

2
isellmacs2 2 points ago +2 / -0

Possibly yes, however, more than likely I would guess that the CIA, at least, was above Obama in that hierarchy. So he was likely controlled by the CIA, and in turn controlled many of the other agencies.

Mossad owns the CIA, which in turn owns the deepstate. China has infiltrated America to such a degree that its got blackmail material on a lot of people, and thus has compromised many.

There are very few people in power who fight for America itself. Right now America is effectively in a proxy power struggle between China and Israel.

1
Herecomedatpresident 1 point ago +1 / -0

Obama was on their side. Totally different and kind of the point.

3
freedomdogs 3 points ago +3 / -0

Or have balls of steel and fire whoever refuses to take directive, even if it means destroying the organization,

3
iamherefortheluls 3 points ago +3 / -0

and who is going to follow that interim's orders when its swamps 30 people in every direction?

2
NostalgicFuturist 2 points ago +2 / -0

What has he got to lose at this point? He fired Esper. Now fire Barr, Wray, and Haspel. He has patriots to be interim, like Jscholl9 says, there's Giuliani, Grennell, Powell, Flynn, maybe even Matt Gaetz.