This nullifies all of the states seeking to use the "popular vote". They can't use votes that they don't have standing to review. It prevents the popular vote from ever becoming an official tally with legal meaning.
Comments (8)
sorted by:
This nullifies all of the states seeking to use the "popular vote". They can't use votes that they don't have standing to review. It prevents the popular vote from ever becoming an official tally with legal meaning.
I disagree because they could have heard it to set that precident. If they hear another case on Monday and reference this dismissed one, then yes.
You make a solid point