Win uses cookies necessary for site functionality, as well as for personalization. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies as described in our Privacy Policy.
Lin Wood is someone I dont inherently trust. Something tells me he's got some ulterior motives involved with this whole thing.
Powell and Flynn are different though. You should check out Powell's book Licensed to Lie if you want a reason to trust that she's the real deal. She does not take on cases for political purposes. She takes on cases that she believes require justice, and she will only argue on behalf of a cause that she is certain is correct.
She's an absolute force to be reckoned with. I think her confidence stems from the fact that, so long as the Justice system provides avenues to contest, appeal, and demand your arguments be heard, she knows that her cases are solid.
The skepticism is understandable, but I'd encourage you to maybe take a pause on the play by play developments and really get to know Powell through her book. She's impressive as hell and I trust her completely.
I trust that they believe this to be true, but our beliefs will only carry us so far. At some point the evidence will need to be considered, and if it is not, then it will be up to other methods for seeking redress.
Lin Wood is someone I dont inherently trust. Something tells me he's got some ulterior motives involved with this whole thing.
Powell and Flynn are different though. You should check out Powell's book Licensed to Lie if you want a reason to trust that she's the real deal. She does not take on cases for political purposes. She takes on cases that she believes require justice, and she will only argue on behalf of a cause that she is certain is correct.
She's an absolute force to be reckoned with. I think her confidence stems from the fact that, so long as the Justice system provides avenues to contest, appeal, and demand your arguments be heard, she knows that her cases are solid.
The skepticism is understandable, but I'd encourage you to maybe take a pause on the play by play developments and really get to know Powell through her book. She's impressive as hell and I trust her completely.
These are not the words of a man who is uncertain of the outcome:
Speaker 11: (41:34) You know that it’s tradition for previous presidents to go to the next president’s inauguration. So will you attend Joe Biden’s?
Donald Trump: (41:40) I don’t want to say that yet.
Speaker 11: (41:41) But he is going to be inaugurated.
Donald Trump: (41:42) I mean, I know the answer, I’ll be honest. I know the answer, but I just don’t want to say it yet.
Speaker 11: (41:45) Is that a yes?
Donald Trump: (41:45) Look. A thing like this possibly has never happened before, but maybe people just didn’t catch it, but we’ve caught it.
^ transcript of his last press conference: https://www.rev.com/blog/transcripts/donald-trump-thanksgiving-call-to-troops-transcript-2020-addresses-possibility-of-con
I can trust Trump and be pissed at the Judiciary all at the same time.
I trust that they believe this to be true, but our beliefs will only carry us so far. At some point the evidence will need to be considered, and if it is not, then it will be up to other methods for seeking redress.
is good stronger than evil?
Not really. I think it's wishful thinking at this point.
Call me a doomer, but I'm willing to fight, but not to live on my knees. That is reserved for GOD ALONE.
There is a special place for Christian Martyrs that has nothing to do with lusts of the flesh.
Napoleon told his people he'd win too.
History is littered with people who lost.
Imagine if Churchill told the people of England they'd lose.