No, their judgement was that no state has any business interfering in the election of any other state. Texas was the plaintiff. Trump had filed a motion but because Texas had no standing, the motions were all dismissed.
Honestly, it could come back to haunt us one day if they had ruled that states can interfere in other elections. One state could mandate IDs and other states could sue for "voter suppression".
SCOTUS told us how to win in their statement. It has to be filed by someone with standing. That was the original plan anyways. The Texas thing was exciting but it was never the plan.
No, their judgement was that no state has any business interfering in the election of any other state. Texas was the plaintiff. Trump had filed a motion but because Texas had no standing, the motions were all dismissed.
Honestly, it could come back to haunt us one day if they had ruled that states can interfere in other elections. One state could mandate IDs and other states could sue for "voter suppression".
SCOTUS told us how to win in their statement. It has to be filed by someone with standing. That was the original plan anyways. The Texas thing was exciting but it was never the plan.
The UNCONSTITUTIONAL action by those STATES DOES harm every STATE and EVERY PERSON IN EVERY STATE.
SCOTUS SCREWED UP.