You are correct - they cannot be trusted to do what is right or necessary.
Everyone please expose Racine, Wisconsin and watch this video exposing “The flow of Zuckerberg’s money directly to Racine” to use as the model for stealing the election.
Expose the “Root” and Bellwether of America - Racine, Wisconsin. Investigate and expose Brad Smith from Racine who is the key advisor to the global elite using COVID and elections to forge the Agenda with ElectionGuard, Microsoft, Dominion, CTCL, The New Deal and others involved.
Why did Mayor Pete make the final pitch for Biden in Racine? How is Hunter Biden’s tattoo related to Finger Lakes, Weill Cornell and their model in Racine?
Why did Mayor Pete make the final pitch for Biden in Racine?
Because they are planning on making him "president" in 2028. They will force 8 years of an illegitimate Biden/Harris presidency and then rig 2028 for Buttigieg so that he can implement the Agenda 2030 depopulation agenda.
The plan appears to be Buttigieg becomes president in 2028, while Greta Neubauer and Trevor Jung both become Governor of Wisconsin and Mayor of Racine in 2030, followed by the beginning stages of a depopulation agenda known as Agenda 2030. Is this accurate?
How is Hunter Biden’s tattoo related to Finger Lakes, Weill Cornell and their model in Racine?
Hunter Bidens back tattoo IS a depiction of finger lakes, where Cornell University is located. A huge amount of people from Racine attended Cornell University, including the Johnson family, and Joe Biden made a speech at Cornell the same year that the biggest donation in Cornells history was donated by the Johnson foundation.
The "predictions" made by the Club of Rome. They determined that global population would rise until 2030, at which point it would experience a sharp decline for the rest of the century.
no unfortunately, 8 years of biden and/or harris seem to be the plan. why would they steal just four years? if they can steal this election they can steal every subsequent election. If they get their way here they will likely be in office for at least the next sixteen years because buttigieg is probably going to be granted 8 years as well.
these people definitely have the next decade at least totally planned out.
There’s those two judges there that were extra fucking special. Making it about race when it was in fact those two counties that did the wrong use of the form. Not black peoples fault the clerks committed fraud. Why would she go there. Everything is about race with these people it’s sick.
Expose the “Root” and Bellwether of America - Racine, Wisconsin. Investigate and expose Brad Smith from Racine who is the key advisor to the global elite using COVID and elections to forge the Agenda with ElectionGuard, Microsoft, Dominion, CTCL, The New Deal and others involved.
In NYC tonight I can almost assure you that certain segments of the population are 'wildin' while others have police cars watching for more than 3 people in a house.
So, I don't really understand how they didn't have standing. If other states are fraudulent that fraudulent activity does affect states like Texas; it affects everyone. Do you have an easy explanation you could share with me that would help me understand?
I agree with this take in all honesty. Rudy said that he is going to file the same lawsuit and target it in WI, MI, PA and GA. Go through the process and back up to the Supreme Court. If they shoot it down again, then I am 100% on board with them being compromised.
At this point in time I still have much reason to believe they are loyal to our constitution.
LMAO no they're not. The court "found" the right to abortion and birthright citizenship both in the 14th amendment. If any 2A case is even heard by them, they rule against it. It doesn't seem like any of them have even read the 10th amendment.
SCOTUS will not rule Constitutionally regardless of anyone's standing if they even take a case. It is clear they are part of the swamp and must be drained as well. What a disgrace they are.
if they hand us a victory that easy they know the left would cry foul
It is more a question of minimizing this as much as possible vs. the inevitable accusations. Well over a third of the left believes this election was stolen. That's from DailyKOS, a hyper-liberal bastion. The more evidence that is shown to the people the better.
Let's by faith in God and Jesus believe that somehow the Texas lawsuit was the decoy put in place to be thrown so the next lawsuits that are going to be accepted can be trusted by more people, the Court did a big disservice to themselves by refusing to hear Texas but It could be that they decide it was -even very big- a fair price to pay for the sake of a bigger and traumatic event for the country as it would be to overturn a fraudulent election.
Easy. The Texas case was arguing that Texas has a right to interfere in how other states enforce their election laws, and how other states choose their electors.
If the SCOTUS had ruled in Texas's favor, instantly other states might bring lawsuits against Texas, arguing that Texas is not enforcing its own laws properly when it comes to things like gun ownership or climate change or who knows what. It could become litigation hell.
Plus, Texas is was alleging that they were a damaged party... but Texas still has its electoral votes.
So it's a very messy claim being made, in my opinion as a non-attorney.
If the SCOTUS are all supreme patriots and defenders of the constitution, and enemies of election fraud, I would expect them to dismiss this Texas case and accept one of the other four cases about election fraud headed their way, from Lin Wood, etc.
The worst part of the Texas case was it appeared out of nowhere, many of us were told "this is the big one, pin all your hopes on this one" and then it vanished back into thin air, without any real explanation or contextualization. That's a big part of why it upset so many of us I think.
No, the core of Texas' lawsuit is that other states have to follow their own law/constitution in the conduct of their election, not that a state can tell another state how to act. The federal constitution requires that states adhere to their own rules. This was clearly violated. This was clearly unconstitutional. There is no threat of taking on this case encouraging future cases because states rarely break their own rules, and it would have to run afoul of another state, the Presidency being the only federal election.
The standing is just a phony argument for the SC to dodge the fact that they know the election was stolen and they don't want a ruling for Trump before the electors meet and vote for Biden. They have reserved the right to conduct a show trial after Biden has been sworn in, where they will finally uphold laws but provide no remedy saying the outcome is moot, we can't undue a swearing in of a phony president.
But if another state does not follow its own rules, does that make Texas an injured party? In my opinion, this is a murky territory. It seems like it would be better if citizens inside PA brought the suit, or if an election candidate, like Trump, brought the suit.
Furthermore, let's say that California believes in man-made global warming. Then let's say they sue Texas, claiming that Texas is violating its own constitution in some way, and that California citizens are being damage by CO2 or some crap, as a result of Texas not following its own constitution and its own laws in some fashion. Isn't this part of the precedent of the Texas case? Honest question here.
Also, if the Texas case really was a legitimate case, wouldn't there be at least a few dissenting voices? All nine SCOTUS justices, without exception, said they would not grant any remedy to Texas in this suit. Alito and Thomas said they would be willing to listen to Texas as a mere formality but would not grant any remedy to them at all. So it was really 9-0 in favor of dismissal, or rejection, or whatever the legal term is. This leads me to believe that they might rule differently in a different election fraud cause, with more dissenting voices. Any thoughts?
So, I believe only a State fighting another state can claim original jurisdiction. This means a case doesn't have to work its way up through the court system to be heard. This also allows for the presentation of evidence in hearings. The goal behind the state lawsuit was to force the Supreme Court to review the evidence of fraud and illegality and make a ruling on whether there was merit to these claims. Not to directly overturn the election.
You might have better standing as a candidate, Parnell case from PA or the Trump Campaign cases working their way through GA and MI. You might also have standing as a party, this would be the AZ, NV, and MI cases. Some of these might not still be active or switched to Trump after State Supreme Court dismissals, not sure of every cases status.
The problem with these cases is that State Courts are stonewalling the cases from having a hearing and submitting evidence. The supreme court doesn't like to rule on cases that haven't been tried below them and they generally do not accept new evidence. Even if Trump can get these cases to the Supreme Court he will probably only get relief to demand the case be resubmitted to the State Court or Federal Court Jurisdiction of that state. This is massively time consuming and might put us past the inauguration, the local courts are corruptly trying to run out the clock. Only the Nevada case presented evidence, and it is probably the weakest of the cases because it requires that the Supreme Court review whether states are breaking federal election laws by not making sure illegal aliens don't vote. This is considered politically toxic as it would force states like CA and NY to be closer to purple instead of blue.
Virtually every case that affects multiple states is a federal law issue, like smog is ruled on by the EPA. States can have their own standard for emissions, although Trump has tried to eliminate this, but they can't demand another state meet any standard above the federal standard. The same would be true for the minimum wage, even though corporations exist in multiple states. The only issue where this isn't the case is the federal election of the President.
They refused the Texas case because it wrapped up enough states where if they ruled, Biden would be in a situation where he didn't have enough electoral votes to become President. The Supreme Court essentially said, that they didn't believe as an institution they should be interfering in the choosing of the President, even if the election was illegitimate. I think Roberts has convinced the group, and it may have been easy because they are all uniparty except ACB, Thomas, and Alito that they shouldn't hear any case that could stop the selection of Biden as President, until he is already sworn in.
Those are my 3 cents for whatever they are worth, but it was fun to summarize.
I appreciate what you say about the SCOTUS not generally accepting new evidence, and lower courts stonewalling. Those two things put together seem problematic. I wish people would simply explain these sorts of details somewhere--or perhaps I'm just nostalgic for the days when we pretended to have an unbiased news media to help us understand issues...
Well I predict that these SCOTUS justices are going to learn some painful lessons in the future, sooner or later. What an amazing decision for nine people to make, if they end up deciding the fate of the world.
I think the fear of opening the floodgates of States suing each other over legal differences is a reasonable explanation for AOC and Kavanaugh and Gorsuch ruling the way that they did.
I feel that they have better information on what they are thinking than I ever will, so I it makes sense to trust them. I also have faith that they are looking at the other briefs and cases that are incoming and are choosing a better spot.
I think the fear of opening the floodgates of States suing each other over legal differences is a reasonable explanation for AOC and Kavanaugh and Gorsuch ruling the way that they did.
*ACB, imagining AOC being on SCOTUS would be a nightmare...
If I understand the order correctly, Alito and Thomas simply said they do not think the court can reasonably deny the plaintiff leave to file a complaint as they believe the court must allow any complaint to be raised when they have original jurisdiction. In other words, disputes by states are the jurisdiction of the supreme Court and so they believe that a complaint must at least be filed. They made no determinations on the case itself, and said they would have not provided the relief sought. So unless I misunderstood something (which is certainly a possibility) I don't make much of Alito and Thomas' remarks in the order.
4 days ago they also rejected the same case but this time brought by PA senator Mike Kelly against PA.
Incorrect. SCOTUS denied the emergency injunction relief request. Which is easily understood by the fact that courts always try to do the least amount of intervention possible.
Ill believe it when I see it. I've watched a bunch of these hearings. The fact that people like this are allowed to sit as judges is horrifying.
I cant help but imagine how many people have been fucked legally by these cunts over the years. Fuck the election for a second. These people rule over everyday citizens. You think there is justice for them?
Yes I do. As a former atheist, I can tell you that I believe what it says in the bible about "Revenge is Mine" meaning people eventually reap what they sow.
Unfortunately, that doesn't help us solve problems here and now, unless corrupt people have a sudden change of heart, which by the way I do believe can happen. All we need right now is a miracle, and if you watched the 2016 election then perhaps you know that miracles do happen, even when people least expect them.
Standing is just a made-up legal term that allows judges the excuse to not have to take cases they wish not to take. Nothing more.
If this goes back to SCOTUS on the state level, the same thing will happen. Or, they'll figure out another way to not be responsible for starting a civil war
We can trust Trump and each other, but little else. Bureaucrats and politicians crave the immunity of tyranny, and China has played to this. We're all at war with China, and I don't just mean the USA. That's the reality.
Make yourself strong, mentally and physically. Make friends locally with like-minded people and question everything. There are many challenges ahead.
Just yesterday the Wisconsin judge said that since indefinite confinement had no requirement such as a doctors note that it was ok for anyone to claim it whether they met the definition or not.
Shall not be infringed is just as complicated as indefinite confinement; i.e., too complicated for a Judge to understand. I think we get to berate them like this while they are in stocks in the town square. All winter long.
Yes, I would say that if someone claims to be "indefinitely confined" and then sends a vote under those terms, and posts publicly on Facebook them going to rallies, or parties, .. then it is good evidence, to present the question in court if they registered falsely that way. It's my understanding that you don't have to verify yourself with an id like you would for requesting a normal absentee ballot. I can see how this loop hole would be targeted this year for fraud. I don't have the exact numbers on hand, but I've seen reporting that this classification increased exponentially this year, and was approved, compared to years past. Like thousands in the state of WI in 2016 vs tens of thousands this year.
Jill Karovsky fucking stole her seat in April. Passion was huge for her opponent, and as always, they found enough votes for her. They should all be in jail.
There need to be absolutely airtight election processes, standardized and universal, meaning the BEST possible way implemented across the country to hold an paper ballot only election on one day with ZERO chance of cheating.
That's because for decades Commiecrats have been putting people into positions of power to allow for these things to remain unaccountable for their allies. The same thing they did starting with the education system, filling it full of sympathetic Marxists, they've done to local, State and the Federal government. These are the people whom make up the deep state. Look at how much of President Trump's agenda they've been able to block or impede. Lady Justice has been hung from the Liberty tree, which is rotting from the inside out. There will be no more blood to refresh it with, at this rate.
It was a little different. This was the first time I know of that USPS actively intervened in election fraud. Rs always vote in aboutg the same number in WI primaries. USPS announced they had "lost" a certrain number of ballots, and that turns out to be the same number that Rs (supposedly) voted lower than normal.
With a State Supreme Court seat on the line. No fucking way! FRAUD
Lol, what are you talking about? Dems got lucky because the race was on the same ballot as the Dem POTUS primary, which at the time was still competitive. GOP didn't have a competitive primary. Dems benefitted from the POTUS primary being on the same ballot, just as conservatives have here in WI in previous years. By that same logic, conservative Hagedorn's election was a sham because he didn't have much enthusiasm and still won by a slim margin. Don't be ridiculous.
No we need to exhaust every legal option before Trump crosses the Rubicon. We need every ounce of perception we can get. The harder they fight, the more their corruption is exposed.
My normally apolitical mother calls me every day because she's pissed. She's talking hang traitors and skip paying taxes. She's not alone.
Rubicon Don is a legal option. He can assume emergency power indefinitely. 1/6 is the most likely date for that, when everything else is exhausted. We'd need to flood the streets of DC with millions of us, shut the whole city down so nothing can move. This gives us 2 weeks to muster and conclude appropriately. We need a post for every State, to plan things like carpooling etc.
Texas clearly spelled out why it had standing, 2 judges agreed but unfortunately the others caved. Texas does have standing because anyone who has half a brain can understand that a state is of course impacted by who ultimately becomes president and VP.
The bartender asks for a driver's license photo id at which point the group debates if section 5.3b sub chapter 6c actually requires the bartender to check if they are legal drinking adults.
Wisconsin: You must pay for each county's recount. Which ones do you want to do? Campaign: Ok we'll do the most populous ones to save precious time and money. Judges: Racists!!!
"That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. "
The form of government, our Constitution, is not the problem. It's that the long march through the institutions has flooded every level with Marxists. And what's the only type of good Marxist?
100% this is a VAST majority of the problem in America, fucking feelings over facts... and we all know who bring the most feelings to EVERYTHING in life and it's not even a bad thing... but it is a VERY bad thing when dealing with facts and evidence.
Nothing much to do about it now, is what it is....
RULE 3.3: CONDUCT BEFORE A TRIBUNAL -- (f) In appearing as a lawyer before a tribunal, a lawyer shall not: .. (2) engage in undignified or discourteous conduct
Some of these justices aren't what you'd expect from a judge. They seem like the pissed off lady trying to trick the Target Customer Care desk to take back their shitty pair of shoes they bought a month ago.
Zuckerberg, Gates, Fauci, Weill Cornell and others used Racine, Wisconsin as their model to steal the election. Brad Smith from Racine is the key advisor to all of them using COVID and elections to forge the agenda with ElectionGuard, Microsoft, Dominion, VotingWorks, the Defending Democracy Project, CTCL and others.
This is why Nancy Pelosi said:
”No pressure. It’s all riding on Wisconsin. No pressure.”
Everyone need to help expose the ROOT and model. This is really what got Jenny Moore and others killed.
Weill Cornell is the key to unlocking the agenda and exposing the “root” and model - Racine, Wisconsin. Hunter Biden’s back tattoo is where Weill Cornell is located.
Gates, Fauci, Zuckerberg and all other elites involved know all about Racine. Brad Smith with Microsoft and ElectionGuard is the key advisor to all of them using COVID and elections to forge Agenda 2030 and the Great Reset Why was Wisconsin the “test” for ElectionGuard, and why did Nancy Pelosi say “it’s all riding on Wisconsin”. What is the Council for a Community of Democracies and the historic meeting in Racine?
Joe Biden endorsed a rigged billion dollar referendum in Racine in a “highly unusual move” to create the models for community health, education and policing. They also rigged the recount to make it ‘pass’ by 4 votes. There were sudden spikes in COVID in the area before the April Primary and November General Election. Racine also passed “the most over-arching COVID order or ordinance in the nation” and is openly defying State Supreme Court orders to close all schools including private.
Joe Biden made his speech at Cornell the same year the school received its largest ever donation - from Racine. Mason Lab partnered with Weill Cornell to create experimental testing programs in Racine. It closed when it began to be exposed. Racine is controlled by a string of corrupt, criminal and pedophile officials and community “leaders”, and despite being the Invention Capital of the World where they made the first automobile, it is now the worst city in Wisconsin by design, and worst city in the nation for black Americans by design. Slavery never “ended” in Racine with Joshua Glover, it evolved.
Another key connection with UN Agenda 21 / 2030 is the historic meeting in Racine, Wisconsin with the Council for a Community of Democracies.
They're a bunch of renegades who've gotten away with murder so long they know for a fact they are above the law. Our days of living in a free country have long since past. We live in tyranny.
I used to be a retard leftist, I'm in recovery. Sometimes I wish I was back to being ignorant, this has all been so disheartening. Like the entire system is far too corrupt at this point.
Wow, I could understand the argument. They couldn't, because they were too busy being emotional and assuming what they knew what he was saying before he said it.
Judge Karofsky was endorsed by both the remaining 2020 Democratic Party presidential primary candidates—former Vice President Joe Biden and U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders.
Ridiculous how he is saying the timing of president bringing the lawsuit was not on a timely manner. Let me fucking challenge someone in a lawsuit before my accident took place, may be 5 years before that happens, because we all fucking gods and we can see the future.
"Ah ha! But President Trump knew we were going to steal the election by mail in ballots as evidenced by his warnings of fraud pre-election. He didn't sue then...too late now"
That is literally their argument in every stolen state.
Just because an election law was broken in the past, doesn't make it ok to repeat. It does bring up a point. We need to bring suit in every state to change all these procedures and bring them in line with constitutional requirements. We also need to have bigger teams of observers ready to go into each of these election centers next time and even be prepared to interrupt the fraud while it is taking place to prevent an illegal count in the future.
The Good: The State of Wisconsin's AG is getting exposed as its clear, and the justices see as well, that the state elections board was loose and fast with the rules.
The Bad: The justices seem too scared to throw out any ballots at the risk of throwing out a few legitimate ones with the thousands of bad ones.
The Ugly: Wisconsin's voting laws got taken advantage of by the Democrats.
These fucking activists judges made their minds up in 2016 when trump beat fuckin Hillary. They are pieces of biased shit that have no regard for our constitution or blind justice.
I only heard part before it was shut down. You can see that the Democrat activists are focused on not disenfranchising Democratic voters. I think our legal team should focus on not counting the thousands of illegal votes created by a small group of evil Democratic operatives. Trump wins. Then focus on the unconstitutional state voting procedures that enabled the crooks. Legal voters who voted for Trump are being disenfranchised here.
Jill Karofsky - Thinks Trump should've filed this challenge before injury happened. lul She also wants to know what kind of election fraud happened. DID SHE NOT SEE ALL THE FRAUD AND WITNESS TESTIMONY YESTERDAY??
Don't even need to prove fraud although it's clear it happened to anyone with a brain... and math actually does "prove" it but too complicated for these idiots to understand.
We just need to show there was enough opportunity for fraud to change the outcome of the election, due to violations of the rules. That is enough to invalidate the election - if the error bars are too large, the result is not precise enough to be accurate. Full stop. These people are illlogical morons.
These are not judges. They are communist activists.
You are correct - they cannot be trusted to do what is right or necessary.
Everyone please expose Racine, Wisconsin and watch this video exposing “The flow of Zuckerberg’s money directly to Racine” to use as the model for stealing the election.
https://twitter.com/AKA_RealDirty/status/1337477357947527171
Expose the “Root” and Bellwether of America - Racine, Wisconsin. Investigate and expose Brad Smith from Racine who is the key advisor to the global elite using COVID and elections to forge the Agenda with ElectionGuard, Microsoft, Dominion, CTCL, The New Deal and others involved.
Why did Mayor Pete make the final pitch for Biden in Racine? How is Hunter Biden’s tattoo related to Finger Lakes, Weill Cornell and their model in Racine?
Racine has child trafficking issues also.
It is the main human trafficking hub in the nation. Who are the “Sponsors” of the Fight to End Exploitation?
Because they are planning on making him "president" in 2028. They will force 8 years of an illegitimate Biden/Harris presidency and then rig 2028 for Buttigieg so that he can implement the Agenda 2030 depopulation agenda.
The plan appears to be Buttigieg becomes president in 2028, while Greta Neubauer and Trevor Jung both become Governor of Wisconsin and Mayor of Racine in 2030, followed by the beginning stages of a depopulation agenda known as Agenda 2030. Is this accurate?
Hunter Bidens back tattoo IS a depiction of finger lakes, where Cornell University is located. A huge amount of people from Racine attended Cornell University, including the Johnson family, and Joe Biden made a speech at Cornell the same year that the biggest donation in Cornells history was donated by the Johnson foundation.
That is all accurate.
What is your basis for this analysis?
The "predictions" made by the Club of Rome. They determined that global population would rise until 2030, at which point it would experience a sharp decline for the rest of the century.
Also, Joe Biden endorsed a rigged referendum in Racine earlier this year, and then was magically elected president in a rigged presidential election only a few months later. Right before election day, Pete Buttigieg went to Racine to endorse for Joe Biden, indicating that the plan is to pass the baton on to Buttigieg after Biden is done liquidating the economy for the next 8 years.
Do you mean 4 years
no unfortunately, 8 years of biden and/or harris seem to be the plan. why would they steal just four years? if they can steal this election they can steal every subsequent election. If they get their way here they will likely be in office for at least the next sixteen years because buttigieg is probably going to be granted 8 years as well.
these people definitely have the next decade at least totally planned out.
You really think Biden would make four years? And nobody likes Kamala. Nobody.
All of them? I mean every single one? I thought some of them asked pretty good questions.
Nah. I was referring to the activists having outbursts everytime Trumps lawyer opened his mouth.
Oh, I watched it on delay, so when one started asking retarded questions I fast forwarded.
Mostly this one, Justice Jill J. Karofsky. Obviously an activist justice.
From the judges? YES. The federal judge in WI who dismissed the lawsuit today was Trump appointed.
There’s those two judges there that were extra fucking special. Making it about race when it was in fact those two counties that did the wrong use of the form. Not black peoples fault the clerks committed fraud. Why would she go there. Everything is about race with these people it’s sick.
Reminder you have to watch the video on Youtube it will not play in feed.
They made the video private
edit: mirror - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ajoztGav1q0&feature=emb_title
Won't play on YT either now.
Also please watch this video exposing “The flow of Zuckerberg’s money directly to Racine, Wisconsin” to use as the model for stealing the election.
https://twitter.com/AKA_RealDirty/status/1337477357947527171
Expose the “Root” and Bellwether of America - Racine, Wisconsin. Investigate and expose Brad Smith from Racine who is the key advisor to the global elite using COVID and elections to forge the Agenda with ElectionGuard, Microsoft, Dominion, CTCL, The New Deal and others involved.
It's now marked private.
One thing is for certain. Ill never trust the judicial system for the rest of my life.
There is literally no path for us to contest fraudulent elections.
The fourth box
There always is, but going there is not good for anyone.
Well they do say better dead than red.
It's VERY good for Marxists. Which apparently includes all our Judges now?
Certainly seems that the 'judicial system' is only there to oppress one specific group of people at this point.
Citizens. Why do you think people like Cuomo want the federal borders open, but quarantines people from other states.
In NYC tonight I can almost assure you that certain segments of the population are 'wildin' while others have police cars watching for more than 3 people in a house.
Liberals have the power and have no problem using and abusing it
Conservatives need to learn that lesson.
Those that you give/gave mercy to will not return the favor.
Lol get a load of this tranny.. dont you have a front-hole that needs to be dilated?
p.s. you will never be a woman :)
lmao to see who rules over you, see who you are not allowed to criticize.
Seems like you aren't allowed to criticize black people in current year, so no I do not think they are oppressed.
Why don't you go back to reddit with the rest of the trannies?
So, I don't really understand how they didn't have standing. If other states are fraudulent that fraudulent activity does affect states like Texas; it affects everyone. Do you have an easy explanation you could share with me that would help me understand?
I agree with this take in all honesty. Rudy said that he is going to file the same lawsuit and target it in WI, MI, PA and GA. Go through the process and back up to the Supreme Court. If they shoot it down again, then I am 100% on board with them being compromised.
Excellent rundowns u/Bluedane u/sir-coffee!
I just want to throw in a reminder that more litigation means more money.
To think Americans have to pay through the teeth in an attempt to preserve their own election integrity is disgusting...
If you're in ga, your tax dollars went to disenfranchising your vote too
LMAO no they're not. The court "found" the right to abortion and birthright citizenship both in the 14th amendment. If any 2A case is even heard by them, they rule against it. It doesn't seem like any of them have even read the 10th amendment.
SCOTUS will not rule Constitutionally regardless of anyone's standing if they even take a case. It is clear they are part of the swamp and must be drained as well. What a disgrace they are.
I imagine it would set a very complicated and dangerous precedent where states can sue each other for other matters not the norm also
It is more a question of minimizing this as much as possible vs. the inevitable accusations. Well over a third of the left believes this election was stolen. That's from DailyKOS, a hyper-liberal bastion. The more evidence that is shown to the people the better.
The certification date was when they picked the electors. All the states had their electors picked on Monday.
Are you sure? I thought some States hadn't certified? Or is it that they're considering de-certifying?
Let's by faith in God and Jesus believe that somehow the Texas lawsuit was the decoy put in place to be thrown so the next lawsuits that are going to be accepted can be trusted by more people, the Court did a big disservice to themselves by refusing to hear Texas but It could be that they decide it was -even very big- a fair price to pay for the sake of a bigger and traumatic event for the country as it would be to overturn a fraudulent election.
Thanks for the explanation
Easy. The Texas case was arguing that Texas has a right to interfere in how other states enforce their election laws, and how other states choose their electors.
If the SCOTUS had ruled in Texas's favor, instantly other states might bring lawsuits against Texas, arguing that Texas is not enforcing its own laws properly when it comes to things like gun ownership or climate change or who knows what. It could become litigation hell.
Plus, Texas is was alleging that they were a damaged party... but Texas still has its electoral votes.
So it's a very messy claim being made, in my opinion as a non-attorney.
If the SCOTUS are all supreme patriots and defenders of the constitution, and enemies of election fraud, I would expect them to dismiss this Texas case and accept one of the other four cases about election fraud headed their way, from Lin Wood, etc.
The worst part of the Texas case was it appeared out of nowhere, many of us were told "this is the big one, pin all your hopes on this one" and then it vanished back into thin air, without any real explanation or contextualization. That's a big part of why it upset so many of us I think.
No, the core of Texas' lawsuit is that other states have to follow their own law/constitution in the conduct of their election, not that a state can tell another state how to act. The federal constitution requires that states adhere to their own rules. This was clearly violated. This was clearly unconstitutional. There is no threat of taking on this case encouraging future cases because states rarely break their own rules, and it would have to run afoul of another state, the Presidency being the only federal election.
The standing is just a phony argument for the SC to dodge the fact that they know the election was stolen and they don't want a ruling for Trump before the electors meet and vote for Biden. They have reserved the right to conduct a show trial after Biden has been sworn in, where they will finally uphold laws but provide no remedy saying the outcome is moot, we can't undue a swearing in of a phony president.
Okay, I appreciate your spelling this out. :)
But if another state does not follow its own rules, does that make Texas an injured party? In my opinion, this is a murky territory. It seems like it would be better if citizens inside PA brought the suit, or if an election candidate, like Trump, brought the suit.
Furthermore, let's say that California believes in man-made global warming. Then let's say they sue Texas, claiming that Texas is violating its own constitution in some way, and that California citizens are being damage by CO2 or some crap, as a result of Texas not following its own constitution and its own laws in some fashion. Isn't this part of the precedent of the Texas case? Honest question here.
Also, if the Texas case really was a legitimate case, wouldn't there be at least a few dissenting voices? All nine SCOTUS justices, without exception, said they would not grant any remedy to Texas in this suit. Alito and Thomas said they would be willing to listen to Texas as a mere formality but would not grant any remedy to them at all. So it was really 9-0 in favor of dismissal, or rejection, or whatever the legal term is. This leads me to believe that they might rule differently in a different election fraud cause, with more dissenting voices. Any thoughts?
So, I believe only a State fighting another state can claim original jurisdiction. This means a case doesn't have to work its way up through the court system to be heard. This also allows for the presentation of evidence in hearings. The goal behind the state lawsuit was to force the Supreme Court to review the evidence of fraud and illegality and make a ruling on whether there was merit to these claims. Not to directly overturn the election.
The problem with these cases is that State Courts are stonewalling the cases from having a hearing and submitting evidence. The supreme court doesn't like to rule on cases that haven't been tried below them and they generally do not accept new evidence. Even if Trump can get these cases to the Supreme Court he will probably only get relief to demand the case be resubmitted to the State Court or Federal Court Jurisdiction of that state. This is massively time consuming and might put us past the inauguration, the local courts are corruptly trying to run out the clock. Only the Nevada case presented evidence, and it is probably the weakest of the cases because it requires that the Supreme Court review whether states are breaking federal election laws by not making sure illegal aliens don't vote. This is considered politically toxic as it would force states like CA and NY to be closer to purple instead of blue.
Virtually every case that affects multiple states is a federal law issue, like smog is ruled on by the EPA. States can have their own standard for emissions, although Trump has tried to eliminate this, but they can't demand another state meet any standard above the federal standard. The same would be true for the minimum wage, even though corporations exist in multiple states. The only issue where this isn't the case is the federal election of the President.
They refused the Texas case because it wrapped up enough states where if they ruled, Biden would be in a situation where he didn't have enough electoral votes to become President. The Supreme Court essentially said, that they didn't believe as an institution they should be interfering in the choosing of the President, even if the election was illegitimate. I think Roberts has convinced the group, and it may have been easy because they are all uniparty except ACB, Thomas, and Alito that they shouldn't hear any case that could stop the selection of Biden as President, until he is already sworn in.
Those are my 3 cents for whatever they are worth, but it was fun to summarize.
Ah okay, yes that is depressing.
I appreciate what you say about the SCOTUS not generally accepting new evidence, and lower courts stonewalling. Those two things put together seem problematic. I wish people would simply explain these sorts of details somewhere--or perhaps I'm just nostalgic for the days when we pretended to have an unbiased news media to help us understand issues...
Well I predict that these SCOTUS justices are going to learn some painful lessons in the future, sooner or later. What an amazing decision for nine people to make, if they end up deciding the fate of the world.
I think the fear of opening the floodgates of States suing each other over legal differences is a reasonable explanation for AOC and Kavanaugh and Gorsuch ruling the way that they did.
I feel that they have better information on what they are thinking than I ever will, so I it makes sense to trust them. I also have faith that they are looking at the other briefs and cases that are incoming and are choosing a better spot.
*ACB, imagining AOC being on SCOTUS would be a nightmare...
Freaking autocorrect.
Autocorrect? Or Google/Apple telling you the future? 🤮
Neither do I, and neither do Justice Alito and Justice Thomas. Frankly, that's company I'm willing to keep.
If I understand the order correctly, Alito and Thomas simply said they do not think the court can reasonably deny the plaintiff leave to file a complaint as they believe the court must allow any complaint to be raised when they have original jurisdiction. In other words, disputes by states are the jurisdiction of the supreme Court and so they believe that a complaint must at least be filed. They made no determinations on the case itself, and said they would have not provided the relief sought. So unless I misunderstood something (which is certainly a possibility) I don't make much of Alito and Thomas' remarks in the order.
The explanation is that they don't want to be involved, the case was good.
4 days ago they also rejected the same case but this time brought by PA senator Mike Kelly against PA. RINOs were happy because they opposed it.
The problem is some people are very optimist, dumb or really love to gaslight like fake media. Perhaps with a third time they will be convinced.
Incorrect. SCOTUS denied the emergency injunction relief request. Which is easily understood by the fact that courts always try to do the least amount of intervention possible.
Sen Kelly's case is still proceeding.
The guy you are reply8ng to doesn't get it. SCOTUS didn't take the case because they simply didn't want to.
Texas, a state, was injured when Pennsylvania sent in fraudulent ballots which affect the Senate.
There is no debate even possible - check the Penn state statutes regarding elections, see if they were followed.
Ill believe it when I see it. I've watched a bunch of these hearings. The fact that people like this are allowed to sit as judges is horrifying.
I cant help but imagine how many people have been fucked legally by these cunts over the years. Fuck the election for a second. These people rule over everyday citizens. You think there is justice for them?
I certainly don't.
Yes I do. As a former atheist, I can tell you that I believe what it says in the bible about "Revenge is Mine" meaning people eventually reap what they sow.
Unfortunately, that doesn't help us solve problems here and now, unless corrupt people have a sudden change of heart, which by the way I do believe can happen. All we need right now is a miracle, and if you watched the 2016 election then perhaps you know that miracles do happen, even when people least expect them.
Standing is just a made-up legal term that allows judges the excuse to not have to take cases they wish not to take. Nothing more.
If this goes back to SCOTUS on the state level, the same thing will happen. Or, they'll figure out another way to not be responsible for starting a civil war
who even gives a shit if they have standing?
take the case
If SCOTUS sits on its nuts, Pelosi will become president on January 20th.
Lower courts are going to keep playing games with cases
She may not be Speaker. Hell, the dems may not even be in control of the House.
This implies the silly notion that you trust the other two branches.
Im young haha. I'm just starting to figure out this political hellscape.
We can trust Trump and each other, but little else. Bureaucrats and politicians crave the immunity of tyranny, and China has played to this. We're all at war with China, and I don't just mean the USA. That's the reality.
Make yourself strong, mentally and physically. Make friends locally with like-minded people and question everything. There are many challenges ahead.
I knew war with China was on the horizon ever since I figured out this was a bioweapon attack almost a year ago.
I've been diving deep into science and history. Horrifying shit.
I have a solid support system around me so no worries here, no matter what happens going forward.
she just disregarded photo evidence of someone out partying when they said they're indefinitely confined like a cunt
"Your evidence disproves my preferred narrative, therefore, it is invalid."
Just yesterday the Wisconsin judge said that since indefinite confinement had no requirement such as a doctors note that it was ok for anyone to claim it whether they met the definition or not.
Not hyperbole.
They either think you're stupid, or they are.
Shall not be infringed is just as complicated as indefinite confinement; i.e., too complicated for a Judge to understand. I think we get to berate them like this while they are in stocks in the town square. All winter long.
Btw WI winters get cold!
It’s like the wool is purposely pulled over their eyes, huh? Can’t be accountable for something you don’t want to acknowledge seemingly.
she looked like such a fool when Jim Troupis just shrugged and said FB posts are "good evidence".
Are they good evidence? I mean that was their 1 piece a Facebook post? How could they not of found one person to come in?
Yes, I would say that if someone claims to be "indefinitely confined" and then sends a vote under those terms, and posts publicly on Facebook them going to rallies, or parties, .. then it is good evidence, to present the question in court if they registered falsely that way. It's my understanding that you don't have to verify yourself with an id like you would for requesting a normal absentee ballot. I can see how this loop hole would be targeted this year for fraud. I don't have the exact numbers on hand, but I've seen reporting that this classification increased exponentially this year, and was approved, compared to years past. Like thousands in the state of WI in 2016 vs tens of thousands this year.
Do you have a recording? They took the stream down.
Jill Karovsky fucking stole her seat in April. Passion was huge for her opponent, and as always, they found enough votes for her. They should all be in jail.
This has to stop. This is SovietUnion levels.
There need to be absolutely airtight election processes, standardized and universal, meaning the BEST possible way implemented across the country to hold an paper ballot only election on one day with ZERO chance of cheating.
It's not just the system, the people are willing to steal and none is trying to hold them accountable.
WI has one of the strictest laws.
That's because for decades Commiecrats have been putting people into positions of power to allow for these things to remain unaccountable for their allies. The same thing they did starting with the education system, filling it full of sympathetic Marxists, they've done to local, State and the Federal government. These are the people whom make up the deep state. Look at how much of President Trump's agenda they've been able to block or impede. Lady Justice has been hung from the Liberty tree, which is rotting from the inside out. There will be no more blood to refresh it with, at this rate.
There are PLENTY of tyrants to refresh it! And many of us here, too.
Oh wow! What a cunt Jill Karovsky is. Jill, you are a fucking cunt!
It was a little different. This was the first time I know of that USPS actively intervened in election fraud. Rs always vote in aboutg the same number in WI primaries. USPS announced they had "lost" a certrain number of ballots, and that turns out to be the same number that Rs (supposedly) voted lower than normal.
With a State Supreme Court seat on the line. No fucking way! FRAUD
Lol, what are you talking about? Dems got lucky because the race was on the same ballot as the Dem POTUS primary, which at the time was still competitive. GOP didn't have a competitive primary. Dems benefitted from the POTUS primary being on the same ballot, just as conservatives have here in WI in previous years. By that same logic, conservative Hagedorn's election was a sham because he didn't have much enthusiasm and still won by a slim margin. Don't be ridiculous.
Nope.
I dont give a crap anymore ... Only one solution left
Ok if you say so... But your just fooling yourself
No we need to exhaust every legal option before Trump crosses the Rubicon. We need every ounce of perception we can get. The harder they fight, the more their corruption is exposed.
My normally apolitical mother calls me every day because she's pissed. She's talking hang traitors and skip paying taxes. She's not alone.
Rubicon Don is a legal option. He can assume emergency power indefinitely. 1/6 is the most likely date for that, when everything else is exhausted. We'd need to flood the streets of DC with millions of us, shut the whole city down so nothing can move. This gives us 2 weeks to muster and conclude appropriately. We need a post for every State, to plan things like carpooling etc.
Texas clearly spelled out why it had standing, 2 judges agreed but unfortunately the others caved. Texas does have standing because anyone who has half a brain can understand that a state is of course impacted by who ultimately becomes president and VP.
The election officials who helped rig the election are now saying there was no fraud. Shocking!
The bartender asks for a driver's license photo id at which point the group debates if section 5.3b sub chapter 6c actually requires the bartender to check if they are legal drinking adults.
Wisconsin: You must pay for each county's recount. Which ones do you want to do? Campaign: Ok we'll do the most populous ones to save precious time and money. Judges: Racists!!!
We're officially in a banana Republic
We have been for a long time. President Trump was so popular he broke their election fraud algorithm. They made sure to fix it for 2020.
They usually just own both candidates either way, probably didn't matter to them who won Bush v Gore, for example.
Romney or McCain vs 0bama as well. 0bamacare was originally Romney Care.
Trump is the only outsider president since probably JFK. Reagan was a weasel.
I mean, I hate to be that guy.
But just look at the fucking thumbnail.
There is a reason the founding fathers set things up the way they did.... I'll just leave it at that.
Injecting estrogen into government hasn’t worked out all that well for us, has it?
THE 19TH WAS A MISTAKE
"That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. "
The form of government, our Constitution, is not the problem. It's that the long march through the institutions has flooded every level with Marxists. And what's the only type of good Marxist?
Repeat after me: Founding FATHERS.
All MEN are created equal.
100% this is a VAST majority of the problem in America, fucking feelings over facts... and we all know who bring the most feelings to EVERYTHING in life and it's not even a bad thing... but it is a VERY bad thing when dealing with facts and evidence.
Nothing much to do about it now, is what it is....
We seriously need to drop the "your honor" bullshit. It only serves to stifle firm argument and inflate judiciary egos to the point of bias.
Judges should be looked upon like mods. They hold power and can use it, but you can also tell them to eat a bag of dicks if they're being fuckheaded.
Respect should always be earned, never mandated.
They are so freakin' touchy about their Elevatedness, and those days are wrapping to a close.
We tossed off royalty in 1776. Time to do so again.
Your elevatedness, I do believe you need to EAT A BAG OF DICKS AND DIE LIKE A COMMIE
Of all the things I've ever wanted to say to a clearly corrupt Judge, this is now on my bucket list.
So remind me again why blm was so pissed at Courts they burned them down?!? Every ruling goes against us, not them.
Tell that to my bar associations... Not only would I get nowhere with the judge, it would also be a headache from ethics
and here we have another monopoly on accreditation to go along with all the others
gatekeepers
I am biased but I think people should be accredited and licensed to practice law
Fair point. I mean we wouldn't want to elect Judges that couldn't pass the bar. (Many states do)
Don't lots of people replace "your Honor" with just "Judge" though?
I know that you're right. Sadly the mandate of the founders (can't recall the precise language) prohibiting royalty and titles seems forgotten
Yup, realities. Curious, what's the ethics problem with it?
for example
No dueling then. Or if we do, we do so as gentlemen.
Indeed. And these activist cunts could use a little humility for certain.
Literally right through it.
Seems she's the only one working on common sense.
oh AND the fucking LAW.
WEC?????? What is this shit.
Yes she is indeed!
Judge: Trump campaign should have known ahead of time which laws would not be enforced.
Lack of standing, no injury yet.
This is exactly the kind of corruption where it is obviously being a high crime. They should hang.
Sadly, this is what it will have to come to. Our country is fucking ruined by SJW's in power
Some of these justices aren't what you'd expect from a judge. They seem like the pissed off lady trying to trick the Target Customer Care desk to take back their shitty pair of shoes they bought a month ago.
They all look like bitter ugly hags
Lol. Same as the people working at the polling places counting the votes
This is WAR
Zuckerberg, Gates, Fauci, Weill Cornell and others used Racine, Wisconsin as their model to steal the election. Brad Smith from Racine is the key advisor to all of them using COVID and elections to forge the agenda with ElectionGuard, Microsoft, Dominion, VotingWorks, the Defending Democracy Project, CTCL and others.
This is why Nancy Pelosi said:
Everyone need to help expose the ROOT and model. This is really what got Jenny Moore and others killed.
Weill Cornell is the key to unlocking the agenda and exposing the “root” and model - Racine, Wisconsin. Hunter Biden’s back tattoo is where Weill Cornell is located.
https://cornellsun.com/2020/03/23/how-dr-anthony-fauci-m-d-66-became-americas-most-trusted-disease-expert/
Gates, Fauci, Zuckerberg and all other elites involved know all about Racine. Brad Smith with Microsoft and ElectionGuard is the key advisor to all of them using COVID and elections to forge Agenda 2030 and the Great Reset Why was Wisconsin the “test” for ElectionGuard, and why did Nancy Pelosi say “it’s all riding on Wisconsin”. What is the Council for a Community of Democracies and the historic meeting in Racine?
Joe Biden endorsed a rigged billion dollar referendum in Racine in a “highly unusual move” to create the models for community health, education and policing. They also rigged the recount to make it ‘pass’ by 4 votes. There were sudden spikes in COVID in the area before the April Primary and November General Election. Racine also passed “the most over-arching COVID order or ordinance in the nation” and is openly defying State Supreme Court orders to close all schools including private.
Joe Biden made his speech at Cornell the same year the school received its largest ever donation - from Racine. Mason Lab partnered with Weill Cornell to create experimental testing programs in Racine. It closed when it began to be exposed. Racine is controlled by a string of corrupt, criminal and pedophile officials and community “leaders”, and despite being the Invention Capital of the World where they made the first automobile, it is now the worst city in Wisconsin by design, and worst city in the nation for black Americans by design. Slavery never “ended” in Racine with Joshua Glover, it evolved.
Another key connection with UN Agenda 21 / 2030 is the historic meeting in Racine, Wisconsin with the Council for a Community of Democracies.
https://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Council_for_a_Community_of_Democracies
Here are several links to verify and there is much more.
https://blogs.microsoft.com/blog/2017/10/19/the-green-bay-packers-and-microsoft-team-up-to-bring-the-worlds-innovations-and-tech-expertise-to-the-heart-of-wisconsin/
https://news.mit.edu/2020/microsoft-president-brad-smith-talks-data-covid-19-why-we-should-worry-about-digital-9-11-0521
https://time.com/5669537/brad-smith-microsoft-big-tech/
https://news.microsoft.com/on-the-issues/2020/05/13/microsoft-electionguard-pilot-wisconsin/
https://www.jsonline.com/story/news/politics/2020/06/30/racine-lawsuit-tests-how-much-power-local-officials-have-amid-covid-19/3284631001/
https://www.jsonline.com/story/news/education/2020/03/31/biden-endorses-milwaukee-racine-school-referendums-unusual-move/5094687002/
https://www.fox6now.com/news/new-covid-19-spit-test-being-studied-in-racine-may-bring-faster-results
http://www.ronpaulinstitute.org/archives/featured-articles/2019/may/25/microsoft-s-electionguard-a-trojan-horse-for-a-military-industrial-takeover-of-us-elections/
Expose the “Root” and model - Racine, Wisconsin.
Notice the difference in questioning. Ziegler asks questions about law.
Notice the difference in answers: Biden's flunkies ramble on about how the law doesn't matter.
Muh racism
they thought they were voting the right way.... c'mon!
Finally one of these clowns has the decency to slap down Karofsky's partisan shrieking.
She thinks she's on MSNBC.
Wtf
I'm starting to wonder why white men aren't racist. Basically everyone is racist towards them.
It's the only card they have to play and it stinks to high heaven.
Political activists posing as judges.
They're a bunch of renegades who've gotten away with murder so long they know for a fact they are above the law. Our days of living in a free country have long since past. We live in tyranny.
It doesn't seem to matter how valid something is. No standing or to late or to early. The system is a toilet.
This should be a wakeup call that our "laws" are a bunch of random [email protected]!c nitpicky inconsistent [email protected]
I used to be a retard leftist, I'm in recovery. Sometimes I wish I was back to being ignorant, this has all been so disheartening. Like the entire system is far too corrupt at this point.
1984
Why is this supreme court almost entirely women? Why is that okay, but if there's too many men on something, REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE?
What happened to muh diversity LOL
Diversity is leftwing code for anti-male and anti-white.
Anti-Christian values
Because equality.
6 women and 1 guy is equal, right?
Wow, I could understand the argument. They couldn't, because they were too busy being emotional and assuming what they knew what he was saying before he said it.
OH how convinient miss Karofsky, you get a good argument from Troupis so then it's just "Lets move on"
Judge is OBVIOUSLY biased.
Judge Karofsky was endorsed by both the remaining 2020 Democratic Party presidential primary candidates—former Vice President Joe Biden and U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders.
What a surprise!
Then you shoot it?
AGAIN Troupis says: There was no injury yet (before election) and Karofsky interupts him when he makes a good point and she does an emotinal rant.
Holy shit this judge is biased.
to be biased is her raison d'etre and why she ran.
“HOW DARE YOU?”
Let's face it even if Trump won a case in a state Supreme Court you know the dems would just appeal it to the scotus anyway.
Yup. This gets appealed no matter what.
The important parts of this are 1) letting us see exactly how corrupt these justices are, and 2) providing a basis for appeal.
On item 2, these shrieking hacks assured an appeal. Nothing they have said has anything to do with law.
"We'll do our own Supreme Court with Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, Joe Biden, and president Xi"
This chief justice is telling him! This stuff was not done per statute.
Karofsky's looking upset.
But actually. I met her and I spoke to people who know about her. She's an activist lawyer turned judge. She's regarded as a pain to work with.
She ran on "not Walker's pick".
Good telling him or bad telling him?
As in she's telling him these statutes were not followed.
this AG is arguing that a 'street address' without zip code city and state is 'correct'. insane.
I think he's lying, it's hard to tell because he's a pure bullshitter.
I am beginning to think that these troglodytes actually believe some of the utter bullshit they say.
I can't order underwear off the internet without inputting my entire address. But somehow it's OK for an election?
If you order underwear off the internet -
you might be a redneck?
Aint nobody got time for that. Too much to fill in. Take grandma's vote and count it.
why is a supreme court judge screaming like an activist???????????????
she is an activist - unbelievable
Duh.. cause she is an activist... this justices make me sick..... Shakespeare was right.. kill all lawyers! Save a few....
Don Henley too! "Kill all the lawyers, kill 'em tonight"
I'm SO over this bs
I think you answered your own question
Seriously. Then he gave her a smackdown with the rule of LAW!
You answered your own question there.
They look like a bunch of people who have never worked a day of their lives in the private sector.
because they havent
Ding ding! You win!
You get the top bunk went we're shipped to the camps.
Rebecca Bradley activated in final based form.
“The guidance isn’t the law”
“But but but if we don’t allow our illegal, unconstitutional ballots to be counted it will disenfranchise people”.
“THE GUIDANCE ISNT THE LAW”
I keep thinking, there are no people being disenfranchised when they are dead or nonexistent.
Ridiculous how he is saying the timing of president bringing the lawsuit was not on a timely manner. Let me fucking challenge someone in a lawsuit before my accident took place, may be 5 years before that happens, because we all fucking gods and we can see the future.
A lawsuit before the election (or certification of electors)? No damages so no standing. Dismissed!
A lawsuit after the election? Too late - laches. Dismissed!
Catch 22
Coup. There is no evidence of an election.
"Ah ha! But President Trump knew we were going to steal the election by mail in ballots as evidenced by his warnings of fraud pre-election. He didn't sue then...too late now"
That is literally their argument in every stolen state.
"If it please the Court, my crystal ball tells me Biden is going to rip up mucho fraud in Wisc. Yah rly!" -- DJT in Oct.? I don't think so
Just because an election law was broken in the past, doesn't make it ok to repeat. It does bring up a point. We need to bring suit in every state to change all these procedures and bring them in line with constitutional requirements. We also need to have bigger teams of observers ready to go into each of these election centers next time and even be prepared to interrupt the fraud while it is taking place to prevent an illegal count in the future.
The Good: The State of Wisconsin's AG is getting exposed as its clear, and the justices see as well, that the state elections board was loose and fast with the rules.
The Bad: The justices seem too scared to throw out any ballots at the risk of throwing out a few legitimate ones with the thousands of bad ones.
The Ugly: Wisconsin's voting laws got taken advantage of by the Democrats.
These fucking activists judges made their minds up in 2016 when trump beat fuckin Hillary. They are pieces of biased shit that have no regard for our constitution or blind justice.
Really good summary and very accurate to this point.
JUDGE REBECCA BRADLEY hammering the Biden hack.
Devaney is dodging the question. "oh let the voter vote anyway."
(WEC guidance irrelevant)>
This WI AG is just tap dancing around violations of the law. Basically his defense is, "Nobody really meant it to be that specific or particular."
Wow Karofsky is so calm for a justice.
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE three binders REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
It is amazing that she can ignore 3 binders full of facts and arguments while screaming completely baseless accusations of racism.
At least justice Bradley is standing up for the law
Keep a close eye on her. She is clever with her phrasing but certainly not impartial.
Elaborate?
She seems more interested in asking question that will cover her punting on a technicality than actually examining evidence.
Her questions to Troupis were more telling.
I could me wrong. I hope I am wrong.
Fair enough. Tragic that no one can have any faith in judges anymore these days. I pray they remember the function and significance of the black robe.
Rebecca Dallet and Jill Karofsky are political activists, not justices.
I only heard part before it was shut down. You can see that the Democrat activists are focused on not disenfranchising Democratic voters. I think our legal team should focus on not counting the thousands of illegal votes created by a small group of evil Democratic operatives. Trump wins. Then focus on the unconstitutional state voting procedures that enabled the crooks. Legal voters who voted for Trump are being disenfranchised here.
Wow. I havent been watching 5 minutes, but these pieces of shit keep interrupting him and not even FOLLOWING THEIR CONSTITUTION?
THIS IS WISCONSINS SUPREME COURT? THEY ARE FUCKING TRASH
So easy to pick the Democrat judges out. They don't even try to hide their bias. Feels like I'm listening to CNN.
WSCJ Rebecca Bradley is handing the defendants ass back to him.
I'm watching it on delay and enjoying the ownage.
There are two gals, seems hardcore libshits. Troupis gave em hell too!
Jill Karofsky - Thinks Trump should've filed this challenge before injury happened. lul She also wants to know what kind of election fraud happened. DID SHE NOT SEE ALL THE FRAUD AND WITNESS TESTIMONY YESTERDAY??
FUCKING DEMONCRAT BITCH!
Don't even need to prove fraud although it's clear it happened to anyone with a brain... and math actually does "prove" it but too complicated for these idiots to understand.
We just need to show there was enough opportunity for fraud to change the outcome of the election, due to violations of the rules. That is enough to invalidate the election - if the error bars are too large, the result is not precise enough to be accurate. Full stop. These people are illlogical morons.
Rebecca Bradley is Based 👊👊
So based.
Get outside and enjoy some sun while it is relatively safe to do so. The Just Noticeable Difference will be here soon enough, friends.