610
Comments (68)
sorted by:
52
Rapidfire 52 points ago +53 / -1

I was actually watching it and I remember her saying that. The stream I was watching never cut out. They are in recess for about 30 minutes. On a side note, fuck YouTube.

11
Johnfox13 11 points ago +11 / -0

Jill was an appointee this year same time as Tony Evers replacing Scott Walker, if the Democrats cheated in the presidential election, I would bet money that they cheated as well in Wisconsin election earlier in 2020

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
4
KamalasCamelHump 4 points ago +4 / -0

Not missing anything other than the fact these people are power hungry demons who want you dead and your children raped and sex changed.

33
deleted 33 points ago +35 / -2
8
muslimporn 8 points ago +8 / -0

Stop calling her a judge. This disqualifies her.

3
jomten 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is grounds for impeachment at the very least.

Lifetime appointments tells you exactly how to replace corrupt judges

0
muslimporn 0 points ago +1 / -1

Stop going along with this impeachment stuff. Do you see her following procedure?

People like that need to be fired on the spot. It's an imperative she's taken off the bench.

That must be made a demand. She must go. Ultimatum. Nothing else. Stop letting them get away with it.

2
jomten 2 points ago +2 / -0

Your reading comprehension is lacking.

I said impeachment at the bare minimum. Underneath it was what I thought was a very poorly veiled execution reference.

2
muslimporn 2 points ago +2 / -0

Demand she be removed now and accept nothing less. If all you do is whine they;re going to keep this up. This is simply intolerable. Stop tolerating this.

You raise an excellent point. The punishment for corruption like this should be execution. Demand that from you lawmakers as well. When there are real stakes for corruption then perhaps that'll keep judges in line.

21
TheNoxPirate 21 points ago +21 / -0

Guys it adjourned! I watched the whole thing till they signed off.

They will meet in closed quarters at 3PM.

9
twitterz 9 points ago +9 / -0

Since you watched the whole thing - how many decent judges on the panel? do we have a chance to win?

33
TheNoxPirate 33 points ago +33 / -0

There was one super based judge. Rebecca Bradley who just kept saying the WEC is not the fucking law and what they recommend is against the statute.

Then two of the others were openly against Trump and started just spouting pure nonsense.

So basically one was pro LAW and two were against Trump 100%.

The rest were neutral and would ask some good questions here and there.

13
Cakes4077 13 points ago +13 / -0

The chief justice did make some good remarks about election statutes.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
1
muslimporn 1 point ago +2 / -1

There's no such thing as a judge who doesn't follow the law. That's someone trespassing and guilty of intimidating a judge. Throw her out of the building.

2
spezisacuckold 2 points ago +2 / -0

There's no such thing as a judge who doesn't follow the law.

dafuq you high on????

1
muslimporn 1 point ago +1 / -0

You stop being a judge when you stop being a judge. If they don't follow the law they're not a judge anymore.

One crime leads to another. Allowing someone who isn't a judge to preside over a court needs to be severely punished as well.

I have to ask what are people high on when they're not convinced by this that she's no judge.

6
Almagest [S] 6 points ago +6 / -0

Thanks for the clarification, my stream must have been late so it looks like they cut it off from my end. I will update the original post.

Anyone have a recording?

19
7
TrumpParty007 7 points ago +7 / -0

That is crazy shit..she went bat shit crazy... I understand that judges have their opinions but to express them like that is partisan and not impartial

4
BidenHunter 4 points ago +4 / -0

It's insane. She needs to be removed from the bench. She said zero about the law. It was all reeeeeee.

4
ArizonaDesertRat2021 4 points ago +4 / -0

Pounding the table with ad hominem attacks. It’s all they have.

1
Almagest [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thank you u/TheGreatAwakened !!!

Added to main post

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
trump2036 1 point ago +1 / -0

sounds like they'll get a fair hearing under this judge.

15
CherokeePede 15 points ago +15 / -0

There needs to be a new law. If a Judge has proven to be impartial theu must be disbared and banned from their bench and EVERY case they ever preside over must go through review.

5
Proda 5 points ago +5 / -0

I think you mean proven to be partial?

1
CherokeePede 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes, ahaha that. If they prove to be partial.

1
Election_Quotes 1 point ago +1 / -0

*partial

But I agree

0
BidenHunter 0 points ago +1 / -1

Never would've had gay marriage. RBG had clear bias, as she had performed more than one gay marriage for friends.

13
Orangemaninyoazz 13 points ago +13 / -0

I saw the whole thing. They are done and making a decision between judges only. I will say there is a couple patriot judges there.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
13
Cyber1776 13 points ago +13 / -0

People should be protesting on her front lawn, going to her office everyday, sending her mail and phone calls about how horrible she is at her job. Agitate

8
Thewickersnipper 8 points ago +8 / -0

What’s her name?

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
trump2036 1 point ago +1 / -0

shes a man

1
muslimporn 1 point ago +1 / -0

Officials who refuse to impeach corrupt judges is justification for rioting.

11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
11
AmericanMonarchist 11 points ago +11 / -0

You just want to keep your King in Power indefinitely.

Yes. That doesn't mean fraud didn't occur though :P

5
I_Love_45-70_Gov 5 points ago +5 / -0

News at 11: Fraud Judge claims fraud election not fraud.

9
Whispering_Stars 9 points ago +9 / -0

So the law no longer exists. Great, I don't have to pay taxes anymore.

6
Illuminaughtie 6 points ago +6 / -0

WTF ? an obummer appointee no doubt......fuckin scum

7
throwawayicanremembe 7 points ago +7 / -0

WI SC is 'elected'.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
throwawayicanremembe 2 points ago +2 / -0

https://ballotpedia.org/Wisconsin_Supreme_Court_elections,_2020

Her opponent led the three way primary with 50% of the vote and then lost the election two months later with only 44% of the vote.

6
Cakes4077 6 points ago +6 / -0

Is that Jill what’s-her-tits? She should not be allowed to rule on this because she was elected this year and potentially would be affected by any judgement they make.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
4
absoluteperson 4 points ago +4 / -0

I was incredibly ignorant / naive about just how impartial judges can be... I mean I kind of knew but seeing a judge act like that activist left a very bad taste. I don't care about tough questions but she was just grandstanding and moralising, casting aspersions and basically name calling

4
bewarethejogger 4 points ago +4 / -0

Law doesn't exist anymore. It's just politics.

3
Cram 3 points ago +3 / -0

Not holding my breath on this one.

8
Notaliberal 8 points ago +8 / -0

Yep, probably will get dismissed, that's how much faith I have in the judicial systems, especially that bitch judge decided to freak out.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
ConcreteCentipede 2 points ago +2 / -0

These disgraces need to be fired and tried themselves.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
MakeRedditSukItagain 1 point ago +1 / -0

I’m still confident in Trumps ultimate victory. However watching this process makes me sick. Witnessing allegedly impartial judges excoriate and impugn a plaintiffs attorney in such a manner, as if anyone who sees the law differently than her thinks we want a “king”. She’s a disgrace to the court and should be sanctioned for her behavior today.... fuckin hack

Nobody mentioned the disenfranchisement of the hundreds of thousands in Wi and tens of millions of people across the country who voted “regularly”. fuck us right?

1
YooperMAGA 1 point ago +1 / -0

No it wasn't. I watched the entire thing from beginning to end.

1
doejohnblowjoe 1 point ago +1 / -0

This link still has the video up. The clip is at 1hour 33 minutes of the video approximately

https://www.freep.com/story/news/politics/elections/2020/12/12/wisconsin-supreme-court-hears-trump-suit-seeking-overturn-election/6522348002/

3
doejohnblowjoe 3 points ago +3 / -0

I copied that clip to a shorter clip and uploaded here. https://video.maga.host/videos/watch/47bfb6fe-7e4a-4cf2-8b7e-2c610e38adf3

1
smartass 1 point ago +1 / -0

Can't wait for all BLM supporters to be locked up as the terrorists they are.

1
ikuyas 1 point ago +1 / -0

How did she even become a sc judge with this attitude?

1
Prosperous555 1 point ago +1 / -0

King? I’ll take that as a compliment.

1
blueyedjonesy 1 point ago +1 / -0

Listening to those Judges....I thought Judges were supposed to be OBJECTIVE. The two women judges interrupting and insinuating racism were any but OBJECTIVE. These are supreme court justices. UNREAL

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
TwitterIsTrash 1 point ago +1 / -0

HOW ABOUT FORCING YOUR COMMIES ON US THAT NOBODY ELSE WANTED? THAT’S VOTER SUPPRESSION YOU RETARD

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0