392
Comments (25)
sorted by:
44
deleted 44 points ago +44 / -0
2
aaafirefly123 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nothing short of a confession from the guilty party.

33
Phins360_FL 33 points ago +34 / -1

this is the federal court correct?

not the case in supreme court

23
deleted 23 points ago +23 / -0
12
Phins360_FL 12 points ago +13 / -1

thnx

11
yvjin 11 points ago +11 / -0

Is the next stop appellate courts?

1
WhyWhyWhyWhyWhy 1 point ago +1 / -0

I should think so.

14
Trump_da_g0d 14 points ago +15 / -1

Too many fucking lawsuits to follow. Wake me when it's over.

10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
1
Trump_da_g0d 1 point ago +2 / -1

Yes, ATF tool all my polymer80's because they didn't buy the boating accident story.

1
CSMKek 1 point ago +1 / -0

ATF is dirty af

26
NinjaSquirrel 26 points ago +26 / -0

Federal court, not WI supreme court

8
Cakes4077 8 points ago +8 / -0

I was wondering, cause besides some hyper-partisan judges on WI Supreme court, the others seemed at least interested.

19
edwardsnow 19 points ago +19 / -0

RED STATES SHOULD JUST SEND MORE ELECTORS!

Oh my bad those are fraudulent electors, well i guess we can't accept those, or can we?

11
Coeus314 11 points ago +11 / -0

If the law of the land doesn't matter, Texas sends 270 electoral votes for Donald Trump.

4
HanginChad 4 points ago +4 / -0

TDW should send it's own electors.

10
RainingFrogs 10 points ago +10 / -0

It's safest at this point to assume all the judges have been bought off or threatened and all the hearings between now and the endgame exist to erase all doubt.

6
Constitution_jd 6 points ago +6 / -0

Please stop freaking out about "prejudice" in this context. It just means that the ruling is dispositive and cannot simply be amended and re-filed. It does not mean that they harbor any prejudice or ill-will toward the losing party.

4
Belleoffreedom 4 points ago +4 / -0

It also means "final," that is, "appealable."

3
Constitution_jd 3 points ago +3 / -0

Correct

6
AngryAsian 6 points ago +8 / -2

Great example of a woman in leadership because she's a woman, not because she's gotten there on merit

4
ChuckedBeef 4 points ago +4 / -0

This is what law and order gets us, it's tie for law of the jungle. No more bullshit!

3
Belleoffreedom 3 points ago +3 / -0

Dismissal with prejudice is required to move the case to appeal. The proper response is, "Thank you kindly, judge, for moving this along."

1
Hoenhim 1 point ago +1 / -0

Another one to hang. Can't wait

0
LowIQCrazyMika 0 points ago +1 / -1

Courts won't do jack shit about these lawsuits. I don't want over hyped bullshit that coming out of Sidney Powell or Lin Wood.... I want something done. We are about 5 weeks away from Inauguration and we have made absolutely no progress other than over hyping bullshit and nothing to show for.