4694
Comments (165)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
130
Sandwich 130 points ago +131 / -1

So this is a little misleading.

The plaintiff in this case is using court proceedings to try to get records from the FBI during discovery. So the subpoena you’re reading is from the plaintiff to the FBI. This isn’t some subpoena from the FBI requesting these items from someone else.

60
Minarchist_Manlet 60 points ago +61 / -1

People need to stop posting all of Ron's tweets as if he has some secret knowledge or insight. He's just a random guy. He doesn't know anything more than the rest of us.

14
sGun 14 points ago +18 / -4

He's helping to spread it though. The more it's spread the further it reaches!

This is news to me and I appreciate it being shared. Share Ron and anyone else that's puting the pieces together for the rest of us.