show that QAnon isn’t a psyop to make us look like nut jobs???
You can't prove a negative. I can't prove that Donald Trump isn't a Martian, but if someone made that claim to me the burden of proof is on them. Same goes here. I can't prove that QAnon isn't a psyop, but the burden of proof is on you and not me to do so.
What I am doing is giving reasonable doubt against your claim which is all I need to do in any logical debate.
I haven't claimed he was legit once (nor did I claim he was a fake either). Everything I have been doing since my first post is going against your claim that he is a psy-op.
Not a backdown, my second comment to you was: " I am not a Q-Anon believer by the by, I just don't think it is a psy-op."
So I am remaining consistent in my arguments. If you do not believe me, point out where I claimed he was legit. I have a good ten posts here. You would be able to do that if you are correct...
You can't prove a negative. I can't prove that Donald Trump isn't a Martian, but if someone made that claim to me the burden of proof is on them. Same goes here. I can't prove that QAnon isn't a psyop, but the burden of proof is on you and not me to do so.
What I am doing is giving reasonable doubt against your claim which is all I need to do in any logical debate.
No no no no. You can’t take the legal defense here. You are the one claiming QAnon is legit. Therefore the burden of proof lies upon YOU
I haven't claimed he was legit once (nor did I claim he was a fake either). Everything I have been doing since my first post is going against your claim that he is a psy-op.
Dammmnnn look at the backdown
Not a backdown, my second comment to you was: " I am not a Q-Anon believer by the by, I just don't think it is a psy-op."
So I am remaining consistent in my arguments. If you do not believe me, point out where I claimed he was legit. I have a good ten posts here. You would be able to do that if you are correct...