Get a grip. This woman is widely acknowledged as being very well schooled on the US Constitution...which is why Trump nominated her.
You, on the other hand, may want to read Article lll of the Constitution...You might be able to understand why she voted as she did.
SCOTUS TOLD the plaintiffs if they came back and filed for a State which DOES have standing, that they would hear the Case.
Sidney filed, late last night (12/11/20) for 4 States which DO have standing.
Read a bit more, please.
And cease and desist from calling a fine Juror a Traitor just bc you are a bit unhappy with the way a certain Case was handled.
It just might occur to you that you are shortsighted and a bit uninformed.
We will see in time. Amazes me how 2 of the judges voted to hear the case while the others didn't. Are you suggesting they don't know the constitution and voted in error?
We will win on the state level. Could be 4D chess somehow idk bug things are at play. Point is I think your post is an over-reaction.
We should go slowly on the Justices.
If it's over by Jan 20 then okay but before that we should just STFU. Which is different than doing nothing.
Get a grip. This woman is widely acknowledged as being very well schooled on the US Constitution...which is why Trump nominated her. You, on the other hand, may want to read Article lll of the Constitution...You might be able to understand why she voted as she did. SCOTUS TOLD the plaintiffs if they came back and filed for a State which DOES have standing, that they would hear the Case. Sidney filed, late last night (12/11/20) for 4 States which DO have standing. Read a bit more, please. And cease and desist from calling a fine Juror a Traitor just bc you are a bit unhappy with the way a certain Case was handled. It just might occur to you that you are shortsighted and a bit uninformed.
We will see in time. Amazes me how 2 of the judges voted to hear the case while the others didn't. Are you suggesting they don't know the constitution and voted in error?