The motion to intervene was never accepted. And even if it had, t wouldn't matter, you can't Trojan Horse an original jurisdiction case by claiming the State is a plaintiff, then having the actual plaintiff with standing intervene. That's just doing an end-run around the proper judicial process and nobody at SCOTUS would put up with those shenanigans.
Trump has always had standing. The cases where he is the plaintiff haven't been rejected on standing.
Than why was the Texas case dismissed?
He wasn't the plaintiff, Texas was.
But he was intervening. Wouldn't that count?
The motion to intervene was never accepted. And even if it had, t wouldn't matter, you can't Trojan Horse an original jurisdiction case by claiming the State is a plaintiff, then having the actual plaintiff with standing intervene. That's just doing an end-run around the proper judicial process and nobody at SCOTUS would put up with those shenanigans.