772
Comments (25)
sorted by:
37
CornPop2024 37 points ago +37 / -0

This article is sorta misleading.

In case anyone missed it, we are awaiting a hearing on Monday at 8:30AM EST to allow the release of this information.

Source

4
Sherlocks_Pocket 4 points ago +4 / -0

It has been leak already though. I posted the link earlier today

4
0
CornPop2024 0 points ago +1 / -1

Yes I seen that article too, but that doesn't mean anything from a legal standpoint.

4
Sherlocks_Pocket 4 points ago +4 / -0

It means They’re not going to be able to keep it secret

2
CornPop2024 2 points ago +2 / -0

The whole point of my initial comment was that the headline and the article from OP is ambiguous.

While there has been leaks, we are awaiting the hearing on Monday to lift the block some other cuck judge ordered on this. I want the results as much as anyone. Tired of this shit.

20
watchman87 20 points ago +20 / -0

chances are it shows Sidney powell was right about it being hacked????

15
deleted 15 points ago +15 / -0
-2
Trump_da_g0d -2 points ago +2 / -4

even a broken clock is right twice a day. i'll give it 50/50 odds.

5
Hangman 5 points ago +5 / -0

So who wants to volunteer to read through both these results and those of the leaked version and provide a comparison, al a CO SOS Docs?

5
russianbot4673 5 points ago +5 / -0

what leaked version?

8
CornPop2024 8 points ago +8 / -0

I believe these 2 articles may be what he's referring to:

Article 1

Article 2

There was some more info posted somewhere on this site showcasing the credibility of the publication's owner (who tweeted these articles).

EDIT: Found it

5
Hangman 5 points ago +5 / -0

Not such a bad dude after all, eh? Thanks, that's part of it, but that's from today, I'm going through my history now:

This Congresscritter tweeted on Dec. 4 about it and it was promptly ignored by most.

3
CornPop2024 3 points ago +3 / -0

Heh, just some random username I thought up when registering. Was just thinking of this clown world we are living in.

I edited my reply since I found the comment I was speaking of. If you find it, please reply as I would be interested in that as well.

3
Hangman 3 points ago +3 / -0

That was it via a Codemonkey tweet!

Thanks for the digital ginkgo biloba!

Edit: Also a Salty Cracker Vid I watched.

2
Hangman 2 points ago +2 / -0

Do I have it wrong? I could have sworn Sidney Powell was talking about a leaked report from MI the other day. Can't remember, maybe someone else remembers?

I'll look again....

3
Sars-2 3 points ago +3 / -0

Last I heard it was gag ordered by the sos and a judge. That they have had the results for 3 days already. That they was supposedly leaked today.

2
Turnerscreek 2 points ago +2 / -0

It’s been leaked.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
nsulltan 1 point ago +1 / -0

This reporter can go fuck themself with a barb wire dildo.

a county that President Donald Trump easily won, but where his legal team is alleging irregularities.>

1
DroolingElmo 1 point ago +1 / -0

We hope!

1
magaeducator 1 point ago +1 / -0

when is soon? january 21?

1
dridas 1 point ago +1 / -0

Where is the email from/to that says to set the error rate? Without evidence this is just a clerical administrative error that doesn’t point the finger at someone. The judicial system delivers charges to people not a machine. Find that and you have a case, otherwise you are alleging fraud of a machine without a goat.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1