19
Comments (22)
sorted by:
3
SurfingUSA [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

( text from the link)

THIS ARTICLE WAS PREVIOUSLY LOCKED AND FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY. IT HAS BEEN UNLOCKED AT THE PERSONAL REQUEST OF STEVE QUAYLE -- From a source deep inside the US Supreme Court as they discussed the pending Texas lawsuit against Pennsylvania et. al. . . .

"Hal, as you know I am a clerk for one of the Justices on SCOTUS. Today was like nothing we have ever seen. The justices are arguing loudly behind closed doors.

The Justices met in a closed and sealed room, as is standard.

Usually it is very calm, however today we could hear screaming all the way down the hall.

They met in person, because they didn't trust telephonic meeting as secure.

Chief Justice Roberts was screaming

"Are you going to be responsible for the rioting if we hear this case?"

"Don't tell me about Bush v. Gore, we weren't dealing with riots then"

"You are forgetting what your role here is Neil, and I don't want to hear from the two junior justices anymore. I will tell you how you will vote."

Justice Clarence Thomas says "This is the end of Democracy, John."

When they left the room, Roberts, the Libs and Kavanugh had big smiles. Alito and Thomas were visibly upset. ACB and Gorsuch didn't seem fazed at all."

Clearly Chief Justice Roberts is intimidated by the ATNIFA/Left-wing rioting. Well, one has to wonder if maybe he can intimidated more by some actions of the right wing?

I'm not going to bother doing that or anything else, and neither should any of you, but I'm just wondering, is all.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
SurfingUSA [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

The fear part is there, whether it went down like this, or was unspoken.

I don't know where any Justices live, of course, but they are seeing bruising battles whenever Patriots come to D.C. for rallies.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
killerbunny88 1 point ago +2 / -1

This reads like bad fan fiction to me...

2
SurfingUSA [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

I agree re: "I don't want to hear from the junior justices," that part.

A discussion of rioting, and fury on the part of Thomas & Alito, I think is within the realm of possibility.

0
Siretch 0 points ago +1 / -1

I do not believe this story because we are not a nation of cowards, and the feds know antifa and blm very well, and can end them anytime. It is the establishment who is making all of the decisions, frankly I think they are in trouble because they didn't realize how popular President Trump is, and how much people do not like Joe Biden.

Just another note, antifa and blm know they are being used by Biden and the Left, but they have no other choice.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
2
TexasPride 2 points ago +2 / -0

Damn, crazy if true. Who knows

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
SurfingUSA [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

I've watched Scotus in person and it would not surprise me at all the part of Roberts pitching a fit, he seemed very animated and borderline aggressive during his questions.

2
TrumpIsTheVictor 2 points ago +2 / -0

I was under the impression that Justices independently make decisions on cases. They don't get together to discuss a case, much less try to convince each other on what decision to make.

"You are forgetting what your role here is Neil, and I don't want to hear from the two junior justices anymore. I will tell you how you will vote."

LOL What the fuck?

THIS IS SO FAKE.

1
SurfingUSA [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Something on an urgent timeline like this, might be discussed in person, instead of the usual memos / clerks / straw polls method.

1
TrumpIsTheVictor 1 point ago +1 / -0

One judge would tell another judge on how they must vote?

These quotes are ridiculous.

The fact that Bush v. Gore is brought up signals fake as well. Bush v. Gore is nothing like this case at all. Totally irelevant.

They weren't going to declare a winner had they heard the case.

1
SurfingUSA [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

OK they do a lot of their work in private conferences, so at least that part checks out:

Conference Days: The Justices meet in a private conference to discuss cases argued earlier that week. The Justices also discuss and vote on petitions for review. The building is open to the public but the Justices do not take the Bench.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/legendkeyinfo.aspx#:~:text=Conference%20Days%3A%20The%20Justices%20meet,do%20not%20take%20the%20Bench.

2
TrumpIsTheVictor 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thanks for the info.

If this story is true, my opinion of the Supreme Court dropped even lower.

And Justice Roberts is the lord of scumbags.

1
CubanitoLopez 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fakeeeeee

1
BillionsAndBillions 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah this Hal Turner guy is fake news in my experience.

1
SurfingUSA [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

O.P. here -- I wouldn't bet the ranch on this, BUT .....

Do we think something much different happened? Or not?

1
JimmyJam 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah. I’m gonna say this didn’t happen

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0