Which would mean that the Wuhan flu wouldn't be so easily spread. So, given those 2 practices, and the supposed number of Wu flu cases, then the Wuhan flu is by far the most spreadable disease ever known to man if the current numbers are accurate yet we've managed to stamp down influenza to 0.
And yet in places that never mandated masks or had lockdowns, their cases are basically the exact same as everywhere else. They like to forget about this little problem with their data.
Wouldn't those same practices reduce covid as well since they share the same transmission vectors? The msm is screaming that this deadly plague is always on the rise.
They’re saying that the measures are working on covid and it would be worse without them. And apparently it’s an unfair comparison to look at states that are still open and compare. They think questioning the election results is a naked power grab except that’s exactly what lockdowns are. Alas
I asked my Princeton-educated Communist friend I know about why the flu was eradicated and that's what he said. I asked him why COVID is spreading so fast then and he said it's because masks and social distancing work for the flu but not as well for Covid. Ridiculous mental gymnastics.
confirmed by the WHO: https://www.who.int/influenza/gisrs_laboratory/updates/flunet_globalviruscirculation_20201120.pdf?ua=1
and in comparison to 2019: https://www.who.int/influenza/gisrs_laboratory/updates/flunet_globalviruscirculation_20200522.pdf
you can see no flu anymore.
The left (a doctor I know), argued that the decrease in Flu this year is due to social distancing and hygiene practices.
Which would mean that the Wuhan flu wouldn't be so easily spread. So, given those 2 practices, and the supposed number of Wu flu cases, then the Wuhan flu is by far the most spreadable disease ever known to man if the current numbers are accurate yet we've managed to stamp down influenza to 0.
of course they say that. also without lockdown we would have billions of deaths for sure!!
2.8 billion according to sources.
And yet in places that never mandated masks or had lockdowns, their cases are basically the exact same as everywhere else. They like to forget about this little problem with their data.
just like here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zd0p96miSK8&ab_channel=PeanutButterFingers
Wouldn't those same practices reduce covid as well since they share the same transmission vectors? The msm is screaming that this deadly plague is always on the rise.
2+2=5 I LisTen tO tHe scIenCe! Racist.
They’re saying that the measures are working on covid and it would be worse without them. And apparently it’s an unfair comparison to look at states that are still open and compare. They think questioning the election results is a naked power grab except that’s exactly what lockdowns are. Alas
Then show him AZ's stats, apparently 380% higher flu case load over last year
How can flu go down to zero there, spike past anything we've seen somewhere else, but covid is also increasing, but it's also decreasing.
Q: Similarly, how can someone have $400k income from China, but also not have it?
A: By not counting (reporting) it
I asked my Princeton-educated Communist friend I know about why the flu was eradicated and that's what he said. I asked him why COVID is spreading so fast then and he said it's because masks and social distancing work for the flu but not as well for Covid. Ridiculous mental gymnastics.
I love data. It's so great.
Wtf, this is egregiously obvious. Flu/medical pedes, is there any alternate explanation for this?
I tried to find out but i was unsuccessful. Look at CW50. We know that flu cases will rise. Fauci predicted a spike in CW5. what a genius-.-
Wuflu is contagious like a cold (and dangerous to 0.1% of the population). Flu is much less contagious so all our distancing has prevented flu spread.