10766
Comments (959)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
11
AngryBrit2 11 points ago +22 / -11
  1. No, "COVID-19" is not real. It's a mere construct of a non-specific set of non-specific symptoms associated with a hypothetical causal agent which has never been shown to exist or cause these symptoms.

  2. There are no good statistics for "SARS-CoV-2" RT-PCR tests because there is no gold standard by which to determine the accuracy of tests or the infection rate in any tested group.

PROVE ME WRONG.

15
LadyPersephone 15 points ago +17 / -2

I don't understand what you mean by never been shown to exist. You can see COVID-19 viruses on the scanning and transmission electron microscope, and differentiate it from other similar viruses (like MERS-cov and SARS-cov) based on the specific nucleocapsid proteins and the spike protein coatings which gives them their name (the corona).

-4
IdealWrongdoer -4 points ago +2 / -6

Prove that those are actually the disease causing agent and that they correspond to the same full sequence genome of SARS-CoV-2.

6
clarence-thomas 6 points ago +7 / -1

Wtf are you going on about? You can argue that the government response is excessive (and I mostly everyone probably agrees) but you invalidate your entire argument when you claim the disease itself doesn't even exist. What do you think is going on when there is an outbreak in a senior care home and so many people die?

The other guy is right, whether its a microscope or genome sequence showing its similarity to SARS-cov, the virus does objectively exist