912
Comments (60)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
57
ChicagoMAGA 57 points ago +58 / -1

Quit calling them liberals. People here misuse the term as much as those on the left. Being liberal just means you value liberty. And you think the Nazis would have cared about the Chinavirus? Newsflash: they wouldn't.

But indeed, fuck this gal. She's just a useful idiot. These people never stopped and thought, "Well, I never got sick before the Chinavirus existed when buying products from this business. Why would I get sick now if they've always been good with hygiene and sanitation?"

23
CoffeeMan [S] 23 points ago +23 / -0

You are correct! I should have said Leftist or communist!

8
ChicagoMAGA 8 points ago +9 / -1

Happy to help. I like the username by the way. Drinking my morning coffee as I type this =)

5
Doth 5 points ago +5 / -0

It's 10am, fuck it, I'm making a gin & tonic. I'll dump a coffee pod in before I mix it up.

2
ChicagoMAGA 2 points ago +3 / -1

KEK nice I love gin and tonics. What gin are you using?

1
dennis_nedry 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's a bit trickier than that, and this is important to remember. The left is far from united, there's plenty of left wing groups who hate each others.

Let's also keep in mind that the socialists are propaganda experts who often pretend to be liberals, because once they succeed to make people believe that they're suddenly the centrists, i.e the neutral part in the middle. After that they'll accuse everyone else for being a right or left extremist.

Now commies are the most left of all lefties, but they're not necessary authoritarian, even tho they believe that they can reach their utopia after converting to authoritarian socialism. Socialists are authoritarian by default, there's no "liberal socialism", it's just propaganda. Commies hate socialists and their SJW and LGBT BS

Liberals and centrists are few but they do exist, many actual liberals has joined the "far right" these days and I wouldn't be surprised if many of them support Trump too. They can be recognized because of their neutral mindset as in no matter which side they talk to, there's no hate. In contrast, a fake liberal will be very hostile, especially towards conservatives, and that's how you tell the difference.

So to make a long story short, the person in the picture is definitely plain and simple a socialist pretending to be liberal, notice their passive aggressive behavior, the badly covered threats (not what they will do but what their beloved authority, the government will do). The smiley (ruining other people life is the only enjoyable thing they have, so no doubt they have some kind of smug face irl too).

I wouldn't call them a Nazi either because national socialists usually kept to themselves and didn't want to bother others. Also, even Hitler had some standards and wouldn't tolerate the SJW and LGBT bullshit we see today.

2
2016TrumpMAGA 2 points ago +2 / -0

there's plenty of left wing groups who hate each others.

One of our missions needs to be to drive as many wedges as possible between the various leftist groups.

1
dennis_nedry 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's the only way to defeat them, recognize the difference between those groups and use that to turn them against each others. It's funny how those who claim to be tolerant are the least tolerant people of them all.

2
NerBolanski 2 points ago +2 / -0

You are getting there.the Nazis weren’t strictly left wing;they burned books relating to LGBT and unchristian activities.

6
Cakes4077 6 points ago +6 / -0

They are the ctrl-left

5
Ham_Sandwich77 5 points ago +5 / -0

Being liberal just means you value liberty.

I wish more people understood this. The modern left are the opposite of "liberal". It's the right who are now liberals (i.e. liberty minded) and the left who are authoritarian.

The whole calling leftists "liberals" trope comes from the paleocon/SoCon era where it was the leftists who were trying to argue for more rights and freedoms and for the government to leave them alone, and the right were the stuffy prudes who wanted to morally police everyone.

Now it's the other way around. The leftists are the pearl-clutching moral busybodies trying to police every aspect of everyone's lives, and the right are the ones telling them to fuck off and leave people alone.

Calling the pearl-clutching moral busybodies trying to police every aspect of everyone's lives "liberals" is about as far off the mark as you can get.

3
Kaarous 3 points ago +3 / -0

Quit calling them liberals.

There's no point in trying to reclaim a term that is now completely synonymous with communist.

1
Stylishman 1 point ago +2 / -1

This is only true in the US

1
Constitution_jd 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes, in England, I am a liberal. In the US, this is no longer accurate

0
Stylishman 0 points ago +1 / -1

Same. Where in UK ya based? Im in SW

1
Kaarous 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm sure the communists hide under a bunch of different labels overseas, but the ones I'm concerned with defeating are the ones here in the United States.

1
Stylishman 1 point ago +2 / -1

Yeah Im not arguin with ya, libs = commies in the US

-1
ChicagoMAGA -1 points ago +1 / -2

I ain't throwing in the towel. Socialist = valuing equality. Liberal = valuing liberty. Conservative = valuing tradition. There is overlap between liberal conservative. Socialist is more isolated, especially when the focus is equality of outcome.

1
Kaarous 1 point ago +1 / -0

There are quite a few battles to be fought that are more important than a single valueless word. Least of all the word liberal, which is pretty much a slur already.

0
ChicagoMAGA 0 points ago +1 / -1

Whatever, dude. Keep misusing words.