4465
Comments (74)
sorted by:
85
Ghost_of_Pinochet 85 points ago +85 / -0

How the fuck can you do an audit of a federal election and not show the results?!

73
DJT2020 73 points ago +73 / -0

Because we let them. No more lack of transparency should be tolerated. Rip the judge off the bench. Bring back tar and feathering.

35
BillGateCanSuckIt 35 points ago +35 / -0

Correct response.

The government should fear the people, not the people fear the government.

12
45fan 12 points ago +12 / -0

"No" should be the most fear inducing word a judge orders. For the judge.

5
Thwok 5 points ago +5 / -0

Can someone link the directions for recalling a judge in MI?

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
4
SordidPontification 4 points ago +4 / -0

Bring back tar and feathering.

Aww man. I was just starting to measure out my lengths of rope.

...then you had to up and change the methodology out from under me!

2
DJT2020 2 points ago +2 / -0

Haha, rope works too, but it’s permanent.

2
SordidPontification 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm okay with that!

3
TheRedRight 3 points ago +3 / -0

Stockades work, public square and we will stack blocks in the square like Antifa backers did.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
18
Dirtbuggy 18 points ago +18 / -0

They don't call it clown world for nothing.

76
TSquad 76 points ago +77 / -1

Sidney is a Lioness.

27
SneakyWino 27 points ago +27 / -0

I love her, no homo!

11
WarTurtle 11 points ago +11 / -0

great way of putting it!

4
dougkeenan 4 points ago +4 / -0

Sekhmet Sidney

30
tiredofwinning2020 30 points ago +30 / -0

trade secrets

Is what the lawyers of the left/Dominion argued. It’s BS though.

15
deleted 15 points ago +15 / -0
13
tiredofwinning2020 13 points ago +13 / -0

From what I understand, some of these states received “free” money in exchange for bullshit terms of service that prohibit them from looking under the covers... it’s complete bullshit and it won’t ultimate stand. But it does go to show you the lengths that people went to to try to hide the truth. This was very premeditated.

3
SordidPontification 3 points ago +3 / -0

This was very premeditated.

Absolutely, because voting systems should never be considered trade secrets.

I honestly don't understand why, if we have voting machines in the first place, it shouldn't be completely open source and fully auditable.

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
6
Weloveflyovercountry 6 points ago +6 / -0

otal bullshit is right! they are not auditing the software for commercial use..any authorized user of a product can examine any part of it as long as it is for their own fair use. nothing in copyright law about not being able to examine a product.total BS.

4
remindmelater 4 points ago +4 / -0

they claim counting is proprietary....lol.....

2
SordidPontification 2 points ago +2 / -0

possibly whatever security or encryption they use might be considered proprietary

Two points come to mind.

  1. I'd bet Dominion isn't using any cryptography in their machines. Their user guide suggests this strongly with the ability to export the tabulation as plain text.

  2. "Proprietary encryption," to me, screams "roll your own." That means it's almost certainly not secure. ONLY trust publicly available ciphers that have been vetted by independent cryptographers. For symmetric ciphers, that would limit it to AES variants and ChaCha20 IMO.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
6
Lady_MaGa 6 points ago +6 / -0

Showing the results would prove Trump won by a landslide.

2
Listropoe 2 points ago +2 / -0

Trade secrets of a machine that’s strictly made to COUNT? Give me a fucking break.

1
tiredofwinning2020 1 point ago +1 / -0

What’s even more idiotic is a judge going along with this reasoning.

Clearly the judge could have said:

don’t release the actual source code, just release the findings.

That would have 1000% solved for this. But they are clearly hiding the truth trying to buy time, thinking that if they make it until tomorrow. That will “fix” things.

21
Shakakka99 21 points ago +21 / -0

If Trump has the power to seize these reports he should immediately do so, put them on a webpage, and blast that fucking webpage out via the Emergency Broadcast system.

This is a fucking emergency. The public needs to be shown with the MSM won't reveal to them.

17
67Vert 17 points ago +17 / -0

So what’s the next step? What does it take to release the results?

14
deleted 14 points ago +14 / -0
5
abakuh 5 points ago +5 / -0

This is what I don't understand. I guess since it was an independent team that did the audit, then nobody but the judge has the results? It tells a lot that it's not being released. Either it's obvious cheating or it doesn't show anything and she waiting for the right time to show it and say "told you so". I vote for the former.

7
Nekroziz 7 points ago +7 / -0

No, it’s actually a very interesting lawsuit that started with a guy suing based on a marijuana measure on the ballot in Michigan. I can guarantee you this is the biggest single piece of voter fraud in the U.S. coming in about 17 hours.

2
abakuh 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nekroziz, reading through your other posts, i would subscribe to your newsletter.

7
Nekroziz 7 points ago +7 / -0

If I don’t post here I was suicided lol.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
2
TheRedRight 2 points ago +2 / -0 (edited)

They’d do it to us....yesterday

2
SordidPontification 2 points ago +2 / -0

Exactly.

Leak it. Who gives a shit about NDAs or the likes? The machines shouldn't be proprietary anyway.

2
TheRedRight 2 points ago +2 / -0

I haven’t seen an arrest for a leak of this Minor Magnitude in last 16yrs, fucking leak it because laws don’t matter anymore.

and this Judges order should be appealed is what many would say...I say drag the judge out by the gonads and release it to the crowd

9
donotclickjim 9 points ago +9 / -0

What do we do when they continue to try to have these cases tried before a court but they refuse to hear them by continuing to dismiss them? What do we do if we have all the evidence and under any other situation would lead to immediate arrests but the FBI, DOJ, and media refuse to acknowledge it? It seems we need to have a local court uphold the law to have something to move forward on otherwise it just looks like a coupe.

9
redinmn 9 points ago +9 / -0

Blocked windows, Blocked Results, Missing ballot envelopes, dem poll watchers next to counter while rep watchers are 6 feet away, nighttime ballot drops, blocked forensic results, fractional votes, refusal to look into criminal activities, allowed violent protesting, destroyed economies, torched small and large businesses, etc... Seems pretty obvious why JOCELY BENSON is blocking the results. She is a CRIMINAL.

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
9
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
1
Prussian_Pepe 1 point ago +1 / -0

Judges won't watch it when they are corrupt, bought and payed for, which is what the vast majority of them have proven to be.

4
airgag 4 points ago +4 / -0

Just leak it for fuck's sake. What do you care about communist judges?

3
ImReallyRich 3 points ago +3 / -0

JUST RELEASE IT

WHO GIVES A FUCK ABOUT RULES ANYMORE

3
eddiefast 3 points ago +3 / -0

Scheduled for 7:30am tomorrow with the judge......such bullshit that they held it up.

3
Holeinone 3 points ago +3 / -0

Just release it regardless of what the judge says

3
MattWoodPA 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is the story to follow...

3
Bullet3250 3 points ago +3 / -0

RUNNING OUT OF DAYLIGHT!!!!!!!!

3
TheRedRight 3 points ago +3 / -0

They only come out at Night !!

3
USAF4Trump 3 points ago +3 / -0

So will we ever know the results?

2
masterfulsky 2 points ago +2 / -0

yes in 2022 they will be released on a quiet weekend and never talked about publicly

2
ConradSum3r 2 points ago +4 / -2

Article on this that passes soc med flagging:

Democrat Judge orders forensic audit of dodgy Dominion voting machines be “concealed from the public.”

https://the-daily-trumpet.com/2020/12/13/democrat-judge-orders-forensic-audit-of-dodgy-dominion-voting-machines-be-concealed-from-the-public/

2
NeverFox 2 points ago +2 / -0

The judge is actually a Republican FWIW

1
Junosu 1 point ago +1 / -0

I can explain it. She is trying to run out the clock, so she is stalling.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
JetJocky 1 point ago +1 / -0

That report is going to be leaked sooner rather than later, or, POTUS will order some U.S. Marines to knock on the door and get them. Either method works for me.

1
Jleinf 1 point ago +1 / -0

Maybe she is corrupt and controlled by chyna- totalitarian globalists?

1
GrizzlyAnonbatman1 1 point ago +1 / -0

I’m seeing the gag order was lifted and info leaked...anyone confirm?

1
webthing 1 point ago +1 / -0

Because transparency?

1
ShartimusPrime 1 point ago +1 / -0

We LOVE you Sidney. Stay strong.

'Merica

1
behemoth887 1 point ago +1 / -0

if it wasn't definite proof that the libs are total and complete filthy trash then they would release it to btfo the blumpftards in a heartbeat.

1
DemDestroyer 1 point ago +1 / -0

How can she be allowed to block this? If we had a working DOJ they'd override her in a second.

1
Truth_45 1 point ago +1 / -0

What are the people of Michigan doing about this bullshit?

1
Taco12 1 point ago +1 / -0

Michigan needs time to alter the results or create a fake explanation of how the error occurred but didn't really occur... ya know, LIE!

1
Singledout66 1 point ago +1 / -0

Can it be subponead?

1
Ek69 1 point ago +1 / -0

Because she know that it will show all the fraudulent votes that went to Biden. And it was done. She herself is a commie.

1
pup1pup 1 point ago +1 / -0

The SOS is trying to run out the clock. Block it for a few more days, then she thinks it won't matter if it can be proven the election was stolen.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Psyop2020 1 point ago +1 / -0

Can’t wait to get Sidney’s autograph and shake her hand once she returns to Dallas with biggest win in US elections history. Hope she’s taking good notes for the next book!

1
streakybacon 1 point ago +1 / -0

Good. Now we can see if Sidney is for real.

Get these results uncovered and if it pans out, Sidney is for real. If it doesn't pan out, I move on.

0
SOFGator1 0 points ago +1 / -1

Supreme Court said the Constitution doesn't matter. So, the judge's decision doesn't matter either.