8174
Comments (487)
sorted by:
517
AlphaNathan 517 points ago +519 / -2

CHINA IS ASSHOE

181
donaldismydad 181 points ago +182 / -1

TAIWAN NUMBA ____

211
pinchitony 211 points ago +212 / -1

REAL CHINA = TAIWAN

FAKE CHINA = CCP

91
PowerWordKek 91 points ago +91 / -0

Our Man With The PLAN!

Let's see which scumbags in Congress want to put their name on the NDAA now.

48
Ophelia 48 points ago +48 / -0

GENIUS

68
GlacialSpeed 68 points ago +69 / -1

I really thought it was over.

That our country was completely fucked and China was buying/blackmailing their way into domination.

Remember when the red dawn remake changed the chinese flag out for north korean even though it wasn't releasing in China? That type of shit should have shaken every American.

Then president Trump came along. And for the first time, I really feel like we've got a chance. Keep fighting Mr President, we're with you all the way.

26
Amaroq64 26 points ago +27 / -1

One of the big things in video games that pissed me off a while back was the change to ethics in Stellaris.

There was an egoist/collectivist ethics that were opposed to each other. If you made an egoist empire, you got bonuses on making money. If you made a collectivist empire, you could enslave populations. As an Ayn Rand fan, it was the most politically honest thing I've ever seen in a video game.

Then the devs replaced it with "authoritarian/democracy" and argued on the forums that egoist/collectivist wasn't historically accurate.

I'll never forgive them for that, haha.

3
deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1
6
NorthwoodsCentepede 6 points ago +6 / -0

Pepperidge Farm remembers!

3
Klown_Schwab 3 points ago +3 / -0

Check out this video by one of my favorite political youtubers, Academic Agent

https://rumble.com/vbu7tw-us-election-2020-narratives-plans-and-sources-of-information.html

He outlines the four main narratives about the elections

  1. MSM, Orange Man Bad, trying to do a coup with no evidence of fraud
  2. Trump got caught off guard by the fraud and is fumbling around to get it in front of SCOTUS but they're useless globalist shills so we're probably fucked
  3. Hold the line, Trump's gonna convince the legislature to send faithless electors or something
  4. Trust the Plan - EO 13848 gives him broad emergency powers to confiscate assets and make arrests if foreign interference is suspected. The Presidential Transition Act of 2019 proposed by Senator Ron Johnson and passed by the Senate stipulates incomeing presidents must disclose any conflicts of interest and foreign dealings they have, Joe Biden hasn't met those requirements. he's been excluded from military intelligence briefings, and I there's some intelligence advisor that needs to give an election integreity report to Trump by Dec 18th or something as part of the EO.

I dunno just watch the video it seems like there's a few things pointing to scenario 4 being true which means we're in a CRAZY fucking ride in the next few weeks.

20
PowerWordKek 20 points ago +20 / -0

Could this be Bye bye Section 230...

21
liveinlove 21 points ago +25 / -4

I don’t want section 230 to disappear completely, it is generally a good thing. Big tech companies are clearly publishers and shouldn’t get the benefits of section 230...

12
G_regulator 12 points ago +13 / -1

This! Don't get rid of 230. Enforce it. Give it teeth. If they want platform protection fine them when they editorialize. Jail them when they surpress information

9
3-10 9 points ago +10 / -1

Change it to just illegal things they can get immunity for removing.

5
anton1k 5 points ago +6 / -1

I think getting rid of 230 is a bit chaotic in the short term, but in the long run it allows new paradigms of publishing to appear - the ones where it is you who publish, store, and control content. Remember how in 1990's there were personal homepages. It could evolve into something that looks like we are used to today, i.e. the comments are integrated as if there was a central site that hosts all of them, but technically it is you who host your comments, and so they can't be censored or removed. Kind of like in early 2000's RSS readers were popular, and google reader was your google news. It is the change that happened later, when these giant sites appeared, but maybe it doesn't have to look this way for true, technology-guaranteed freedom of speech to exist. Maybe we should not want censorship-free twitter or see parler as better twitter - until they grow big and start censoring. Maybe big, centralized website is not the real answer. Other argument for getting rid of 230: de facto, all these platforms behave like publishers today anyway, so why not set things straight and declare them who they are. With 230 in place today, they can hide behind platform protections, but enjoy the benefits of publisher control, so f it. Even if the "world" (haha, the world of twitter and facebook) has to burn, maybe we should stop seeing it as catastrophe, and get more energy to take care of the real world, and stop clinging to these fake unimportant things that look like they are a lot, but in reality it is us who make facebooks of the world such critical meaning and make them important. So, see what happens now - facebooks are under a threat, and our first instinct is to protect them, the status quo, the convenience of having them around. We hope that it is possible to make them behave in accordance with the 1st Amendment, we have a dream of an ideal facebook. But in 1776 there was no facebook and it was possible to speak and communicate.

3
decafinated 3 points ago +4 / -1

How about a temporary war time freeze on s230 until we can kill it - then build something new that's similar but with safeguards?

10
TheWilderness 10 points ago +10 / -0

MAGA ((((intensifies))))

8
TacoSmell1980 8 points ago +8 / -0

They need to rewrite 230 has a pretty good bill that would rewrite it.

24
h203h 24 points ago +25 / -1

exactly! tired of RINOS bringing in "refugees" when we are suppose to be taking care of our citizens FIRST. AMERICA FIRST AND ALWAYS

9
ALtHoneyBadger 9 points ago +9 / -0

Exactly

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0 (edited)
4
NorthwoodsCentepede 4 points ago +4 / -0

In all fairness, WWII was won with the assistance of the USAA, the United States Army Airforce

3
2016TrumpMAGA 3 points ago +3 / -0

The predecessor organizations in the Army of today's Air Force are:

Aeronautical Division, Signal Corps (1 August 1907 – 18 July 1914)

Aviation Section, Signal Corps (18 July 1914 – 20 May 1918)

Division of Military Aeronautics (20 May 1918 to 24 May 1918)

U.S. Army Air Service, USAAS (24 May 1918 to 2 July 1926)

U.S. Army Air Corps, USAAC (2 July 1926 to 20 June 1941) and

U.S. Army Air Forces, USAAF (20 June 1941 to 18 September 1947)

2
Jimboslice73 2 points ago +2 / -0

"The predecessor organizations in the Army of today's Air Force are:

Aeronautical Division, Signal Corps (August 1, 1907 – July 18, 1914)

Aviation Section, Signal Corps (July 19, 1914 – May 20, 1918)

Division of Military Aeronautics (May 21, 1918 – May 24, 1918)

U.S. Army Air Service, USAAS (May 25, 1918 – July 2, 1926)

U.S. Army Air Corps, USAAC (July 3, 1926 – June 20, 1941) and

U.S. Army Air Forces, USAAF (June 21, 1941 – September 18, 1947)"

There. I fixed the date format; this isn't Europe.

1
NorthwoodsCentepede 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thank you for the thorough and polite correction / clarification!

1
Jack_Burton 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well it’s a veto proof majority I believe

30
Uzaka123 30 points ago +30 / -0

Fuck west taiwan*

9
BasedInFact 9 points ago +9 / -0

West Taiwan is asss hhhhoooe!!!

3
NorthwoodsCentepede 3 points ago +3 / -0

Totally want to steal this phrase like West Taiwan stealing American intellectual property!!!

17
deleted 17 points ago +17 / -0
2
ryvrdrgn14 2 points ago +2 / -0

China is just West Taiwan.

-15
Chick-fill-eh -15 points ago +6 / -21

End them both, just to be sure.

6
shadypollster 6 points ago +7 / -1

Never.

2
Chick-fill-eh 2 points ago +14 / -12

Lol, because Chinese history before the CCP is all sunshine and rainbows.

The culture is simply incompatible with the west.

14
deleted 14 points ago +16 / -2
1
Chick-fill-eh 1 point ago +8 / -7

The method of choosing officials has little to do with thousands of years of culture.

11
JackIsALarp 11 points ago +11 / -0

Juan

8
donaldismydad 8 points ago +8 / -0

bingo

6
LugNuts 6 points ago +6 / -0

Wooon.

7
donaldismydad 7 points ago +7 / -0

bingo

4
FuckU/Spez 4 points ago +4 / -0

Juan?

5
donaldismydad 5 points ago +5 / -0

bingo

1
Mrsattorney 1 point ago +1 / -0

ONE

18
TheQuickening 18 points ago +18 / -0

Jumping on top comment.

CCP Database Leak LINK - https://thedonald.win/p/11R4SXrQID

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
4
magadds 4 points ago +4 / -0

FUCK GYNA

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
403
Almagest 403 points ago +405 / -2

Democrats have been infiltrated by the CCP into passing legislation that benefits China.

304
ProfessorRomendev 304 points ago +304 / -0

*and republicans. These creatures are called RINOs and should not be given a pass.

90
HolaPendejos 90 points ago +90 / -0 (edited)

They should see what the Chinese do to rhinos

54
human_centipede 54 points ago +54 / -0

Rhino horn more powerful than tiger penis and pangolin scales combined!

27
D0NNIE_DARK0 27 points ago +27 / -0

It’s so gross how they can eat anything that moves. It’s not just one thing that’s gross but the totality of eating all things. Yuck.

17
FOUR_MORE_TERMS 17 points ago +17 / -0

I can't eat Chinese food anymore. At some point, you have to stop pretending that the pieces of "chicken" they give you is a normal-looking piece of chicken.

18
HangTheSwamp 18 points ago +18 / -0

Hey, bat is also known as the "chicken of the cave".

3
Tejanopede 3 points ago +4 / -1

😂 “Shit is chicken of da asshoe”

11
D0NNIE_DARK0 11 points ago +11 / -0

I hear ya. I know a woman who refuses to eat cheap dumplings from the local Chinese place because she’s convinced it’s dog meat from strays.

2
BeardedNinjaPede 2 points ago +2 / -0

There are plenty of videos online of Chinese beating and eating dogs. Some are skinned alive before being cooked alive because that is supposed to make them taste better.

I'm sure there are Chinese in America that have brought that part of their culture with them.

6
Harambe 6 points ago +8 / -2

Thai food is better anyway

1
Zeriel 1 point ago +1 / -0

If only it wasn't so rare and expensive :(

You can get 5lbs of chinese food for 6$

Meanwhile, in my area, I need to take out a loan for some thai noodles :(

3
BasedInFact 3 points ago +3 / -0

Chinese food is asssshhhooooes!

4
10MeV 4 points ago +4 / -0

"Is this food?"

6
LockNload 6 points ago +6 / -0

Tegridy

26
MichiganMAGAMan 26 points ago +26 / -0

These to me are worst. They tell "us" pretty little lies all the while they work behind our back. At least I know my enemy with Democraps. Retart RINOs imo are way worst.

16
TheTuckerDiaries 16 points ago +16 / -0

RINOs are worse imo

13
UnderCoverTrumper 13 points ago +13 / -0

Mittens is smitten with the Chinese cash.

8
winsome 8 points ago +8 / -0

Then Mitt pays Ann Coulter to bash our POTUS.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
1
FOUR_MORE_TERMS 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hey whoa man, gotta keep the majority! Gotta support RINOs no matter what!. For some reason! Mitt Romney is gonna defeat communism with Rubio, Collins, Murkowski, and Graham! Vote GOP!!

2
BranchCovidian 2 points ago +2 / -0

All controlled by Zionist money and blackmail. Pro-Israel and anti-America the lot of them.

7
TenScoops 7 points ago +7 / -0

they had it easier with Demonicrats though, they are by nature communists. Repub Rinos are simple traitors.

63
deleted 63 points ago +63 / -0
20
Burmeister 20 points ago +20 / -0

Half of GOP aswell

11
RonBohr 11 points ago +11 / -0

I'm not sure they need to be infiltrated by fellow Travelers. More like willing accomplices. A commie is a commie is a commie.

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
201
Mooma 201 points ago +203 / -2 (edited)

Fight the RINOCommies!

29
brother_red 29 points ago +29 / -0

Stolen!

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
yodayoda 1 point ago +1 / -0

Correction: the EMPIRE cannot be saved, but perhaps America can be.

1
TheWinningNeverStops 1 point ago +1 / -0

Rommies

1
InRevelation12now 1 point ago +1 / -0
  • and the DemonRats.
176
OrangeManAddict 176 points ago +194 / -18

Do something mangggg like you have the people and military with you. Just do something

52
deleted 52 points ago +53 / -1
32
deleted 32 points ago +56 / -24
47
deleted 47 points ago +52 / -5
20
deleted 20 points ago +36 / -16
29
deleted 29 points ago +29 / -0
3
Thetigerpoppy 3 points ago +4 / -1

Is the Chinese troop thing confirmed?

9
deleted 9 points ago +10 / -1
4
Thetigerpoppy 4 points ago +4 / -0

Thanks. I kept seeing comments referring to it but hadn't considered overly relevant until Australia decided to expose all CCP members, then it clicked that China might not be willing to just let Trump use the 2018 EO to wreck their plans and might try and take advantage of the potential unrest here to forcibly stop Trump from going after their assets.

5
knightofday 5 points ago +6 / -1

Preach

4
mynewspiritclothes 4 points ago +7 / -3 (edited)

Fuck. Your. Optics.

10
deleted 10 points ago +11 / -1
4
dizzle_izzle 4 points ago +4 / -0

He's going to run out of time.

1
dixond 1 point ago +1 / -0

No, he's not.

10
BornAgainAmerican 10 points ago +10 / -0

Yeah but most of America has received more of a civics education since November than they've ever received in school.

9
Barrysstash 9 points ago +9 / -0

"Calm the fuck down. He's letting the judicial path run its course before he goes nuclear."

-Exactly. Lots of unhinged types running around making it impossible to even discuss the real world.

7
InRevelation12now 7 points ago +7 / -0

Agree with that. Trump has said it happens on Jan 5, which is a little close for my comfort. However, there's also that prophecy that it happens over the pagan holiday meant to represent the B'day of our Savior, so maybe it's a little before the 5th. Both are beyond the date many have been fretting over - myself included.

In the mean time, many are exposing themselves. Soon, many of the same people will be bending over backwards to kiss ass in order to avoid punishment.

3
RegularAmerican 3 points ago +3 / -0

Christmas in the old parts is still celebrated Jan 6th in the east.

3
dixond 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yep, that's the twelve days of Christmas.

-2
deleted -2 points ago +2 / -4
0
InRevelation12now 0 points ago +1 / -1

You mean better as in to be more like Kim Clement? He's the source of the prophecy I mentioned, and I do fall short of his example. He was a true prophet of God's word in the classic biblical sense. DJT requested to meet with Kim and Kim accepted but never made it because he became very ill. He had to send someone else in his place. Kim died in 2016. I only recently became aware of Kim Clement due to another TDW pede sending me a link. Learning about Kim Clement was worth the time spent.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
TenScoops 2 points ago +3 / -1

boring. Helicopter time!

2
deleted 2 points ago +5 / -3
4
dizzle_izzle 4 points ago +4 / -0

Hey!!!!

Were all frens here. Stop infghting.

We need to stay together. Now more than ever.

1
IntrepidBurger 1 point ago +1 / -0

Timing is everything. GEOTUS's goal is to win, not to make sure u/OrangeManAddict doesn't have any anxiety.

-8
deleted -8 points ago +2 / -10
137
deleted 137 points ago +138 / -1
35
MagaDevildog2 35 points ago +35 / -0

HOLD ON HOLD ON WELL BE RIGHT BACK

=p Jk i love bannon

26
No_Malarkey_Joe 26 points ago +26 / -0

H-h-h-hold on Mr. Mayor, we'll be right back after a short break.

10
hysteria 10 points ago +10 / -0

"H-h-h-hold on Mr. Mayor, we'll be right back aft-" lol

4
IntrepidBurger 4 points ago +4 / -0

"H-h-hol-h-hol-h-h-h-hold on-hold on-h-h hold on Mr Mayor, we'll be right back"

I love Bannon ;D

9
Green_Card_Holder 9 points ago +9 / -0

Then after the break, what's your twitter, parler and facebook ;)

18
knnbccb 18 points ago +18 / -0

♪Let's take down, the Cee Cee Pee!♪

11
tragician 11 points ago +11 / -0

As cheesy as it is it's catchy hah

4
kornesque 4 points ago +4 / -0

Do-Dah, Do-Dah!

2
KAG_FTW 2 points ago +3 / -1

See sea pea!

5
liveinlove 5 points ago +5 / -0

They are actively trying to take over America while we fight with ourselves. We must get everyone to recognize the common threat and kick them the hell out of here!

3
SillyYou 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yes I agree but, the problem with that is the msm and big tech censoring vital information every US citizen should know. If only everyone knew what we know. Drives me nuts!!

2
unable_afternoon 2 points ago +2 / -0

all it would take is to cut off all trade with them and make sure to not take any shit militarily.
trump could actually probably work out some genius peace deal. totally cutting them off would be fine and it would be great if we never had to interact with them ever again, but trump can probably make magic happen.
worst case scenario would be another endless war but i think trump can manage to avoid that.

91
Trumper007 91 points ago +92 / -1

And so begins Trumps battle with dems and repub's!

70
deleted 70 points ago +70 / -0
45
solarsavior 45 points ago +45 / -0

No. The battle is between the Patriots and the CCP. Any dems and repub’s that are in allegiance with the CCP thus CCP and of such are traitors.

A war is going on right now. It is a different kind of war. Do not let their propaganda divide us.

19
deleted 19 points ago +19 / -0
10
DeviousKid45 10 points ago +10 / -0

Donald Trump is coming to town!

4
BeefChucker 4 points ago +5 / -1

The one thing about this weakness, whether real or feigned, is they have all exposed themselves. Roberts Gorsuch Barrett Kavanaugh Barr Wray and numerous Congress and governors. Their masks are off

1
Amaroq64 1 point ago +3 / -2

To be fair, I've been hearing around here that Texas' case was a long shot because it was unprecedented, and the courts don't like doing unprecedented stuff.

But Trump is filing a case just like Texas' case and the court should see it this time, because Trump definitely does have standing. The court prefers to see cases where you can prove that you were damaged, and Texas arguing that they were damaged was clever, but it was a long shot.

2
BeefChucker 2 points ago +2 / -0

The whole election was unprecedented, never have so many people not voted——what I mean is in person or via the fake fraudulent ballots. That Thomas and Alito dissented, the two smartest, shows you it should have been heard. IMO

1
BeardedNinjaPede 1 point ago +1 / -0

Maybe, maybe not. The two justices that said they would take the case said they would provide no remedy so would throw it out. SCOTUS will not help us decide the election. After we win militarily, they may rule it constitutional.

18
-REEEEEEEDACTED- 18 points ago +18 / -0

That began in June 2015

10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
-2
deleted -2 points ago +3 / -5
1
IllKissYourBoobies 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is less than funny.

7
Greg-2012 7 points ago +7 / -0

That began in 2016.

86
deleted 86 points ago +93 / -7
23
used_1 23 points ago +25 / -2

Seriously. It should be time already for it.

11
deleted 11 points ago +12 / -1
15
BoatingAccident 15 points ago +16 / -1

Might be more like January 18th tbh. We gotta remain steady even though we feel like we can't take another second of this bullshit. Wait for the call, for now.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
3
BoatingAccident 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's 45 days after the election... so you are correct. Damn. Damn... DAMN! I didn't realize it was here already. Heading to my local Farm and Fleet I think later.

2
BoatingAccident 2 points ago +2 / -0

Okay so, scratch my last comment. I'm reading this more closely and it says

"Not later than 45 days after the conclusion of a United States election ... shall conduct an assessment "

Then it says

" Within 45 days of receiving the assessment and information described in section 1(a) of this order, the Attorney General and the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the heads of any other appropriate agencies and, as appropriate, State and local officials, shall deliver to the President, the Secretary of State, the Secretary of the Treasury, and the Secretary of Defense a report"

So to me that could mean that he has another 45 days after the 18th. It also means that the "assessment" mentioned in the first 45 days could already be ongoing for a while now.

1
IllKissYourBoobies 1 point ago +1 / -0

Never heard of this.

Why?

3
retredd 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'm running out of both my Depends & my food stamps...

7
deleted 7 points ago +20 / -13
11
deleted 11 points ago +16 / -5
8
BoatingAccident 8 points ago +9 / -1

He will after all peaceful options are exhausted. Let's be clear. If he DOES decide to "cross the Rubicon" it will be a LEGAL act. Unlike Caesar's illegal act, Trump will have full legal authority, as long as he does it while he is in office. So, we have until January 20th.

I expect, if it does happen, that he will be able to contain any skirmishes to behind the scenes fights, and then we see military arrests. I don't think he will actually need us. But the fact we exist is a huge lever for him if needed.

-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
1
IllKissYourBoobies 1 point ago +1 / -0

...lest we become the very thing we're fighting.

8
obamagavemeaphone 8 points ago +10 / -2

I don't know how this ends

You certainly do not

but POTUS is not "Crossing the Rubicon".

Allow me to reiterate a standing point: AMERICA WILL NEVER BE A SOCIALIST COUNTRY

I fear we will have to initiate that ourselves.

Yes. I sense great fear in you. Fear is a path to the dark side.

But we won't.

But YOU won't.

What's with the WE shit... you got a turd in your pocket?

When the time comes you can just go inside and sit in a dark corner and cower and be afraid. Patriots will take care of the mens work and let you know when it's done.

2
frogwithbreasts 2 points ago +7 / -5

This is some of the cringiest shit I've read in a while.

Drop the Jedi-meets-drill-sergeant act. SwarmIntel is just stating what has become abundantly clear to anyone who understands the nature of the American political system.

Trump has too much personal stake to lose to ever "cross the Rubicon," and 90% of the people calling for The Day of the Rope on TDW probably couldn't even sight-in a rifle. If the electors go for Biden, secession is a far more likely outcome than martial law or a mass Pede uprising.

3
obamagavemeaphone 3 points ago +6 / -3

Ok coward. Go hide in your basement with the other thumb suckers. Patroits will save the country (and world) for you. And if you get in my way when it comes time for action then you'll bear witness to just how well i can sight in my scope. Try me!

0
frogwithbreasts 0 points ago +1 / -1

Wow, you sure do scare me. I'm shaking in my boots. Enjoy LARPing while you can. If Trump doesn't pull off the electors, you'll go back to your mundane life and post angry comments about Biden like every other mUh AmMo BoX boogaloo boi here.

Secession is the only serious path to lasting change.

0
obamagavemeaphone 0 points ago +1 / -1

👌🇨🇳okay commie🇨🇳👌

Your propaganda is useless. Your whole narrative is unraveling.

You have no power here.

KYS

2
frogwithbreasts 2 points ago +3 / -1

Gosh, you're cute.

I'm a libertarian, not a commie. But I've met commies with better political sense than you.

And no, I don't have a narrative, I just have a basic understanding of reality: The system (and cultural status quo) is stacked against Trump and he's simply not going to lead some 3-percenter uprising against the Deep State. It's a fantasy. It's fun to pretend, but it gets us nowhere.

Reality: Trump is a New Yorker who fits closer in an 80s democrat mold than a modern conservative. He wants to bend the system, not entirely upend it. This has been proven after 4 years of by-the-books politicking. HE IS NOT REVOLUTIONARY, for better or worse. HE WILL NOT CALL YOU TO ARMS.

Secession is an actual political option with growing political support from the right. It doesn't require Trump to declare martial law. It doesn't require us to pretend that the military and every cop in the nation will suddenly follow his command to gun down commies in the street. It doesn't require us to vastly overinflate the numbers of militia members in this country.

Push for secession, or enjoy another 4 years of steady decline. Alternatively, try to play guns in the streets of the world's greatest police and military power, and see how quickly you eat dirt. We're on the same side, bud. I'm just advocating for common sense.

2
woyervunit 2 points ago +3 / -1

Never thought I’d say it, but I like Obama Phone.

0
obamagavemeaphone 0 points ago +1 / -1

I still have free minutes.... wanna chat?

1
Wtf_socialismreally 1 point ago +2 / -1

Then that would have to be initiated before January 20th

3
deleteDems 3 points ago +4 / -1

Yes. This country is clearly in a cold war with totally separate narratives on the two sides. Their side is denying any efforts to legally sort out the legitimacy of this election, denying the existence of any evidence of fraud. Suppressing us in every way possible.

Not sure how many pedes are ready to go hot, I think red states needs to start sanctioning blue cities.

70
Tymbo 70 points ago +71 / -1

He wouldn’t veto if he were leaving office in 38 days.

44
fat50 44 points ago +45 / -1

Exactly.

He's not going anywhere. You don't cheat an election, get caught, and pretend to be president. It doesn't work that way.

These motherfuckers need to burn.

11
Onethirty62 11 points ago +11 / -0

I don’t follow, can you explain?

20
STEVE_HUFFMANS_BULL 20 points ago +20 / -0

If Trump’s actually gone after January, the Swamp™️ doesn’t have to override any vetos. Just propose the exact same bill in a month and it’ll get signed

13
NeverInterruptEnemy 13 points ago +13 / -0

Could be symbolic though. Makes Biden looks bad for supporting the CCP and Trump look principled on his China stance. Also knowing the Biden may have CCP issues already.

1
Hawkman 1 point ago +1 / -0

I thought this was just a bill to hold over as a stopgap for a few weeks anyway? Or am I conflating two different budget bills?

5
flashersenpai 5 points ago +5 / -0

He would veto either way. That's how he is.

1
NihilistCaregiver 1 point ago +1 / -0

The NDAA bill is veto proof.

The bill passed with a vote of 84-13, easily earning a veto-proof majority if the president follows through with his veto threat.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/12/11/senate-passes-defense-bill-84-13-removes-confederate-symbols-does-not-end-sec-230/

1
verycute 1 point ago +2 / -1

It's not required that everyone vote the same way when it comes back through after the veto. So it may not be quite as veto proof as you think.

58
YurtsForTrump 58 points ago +59 / -1

no more bending over for tankies. the era of the helicopter begins

58
dontbanus 58 points ago +59 / -1

Notice how the rhetoric is shifting? China is the enemy, not our brainwashed brothers and sisters on the left.

This is World War 3, Civil War 2, and American Revolution 2 all in one. We’ve never seen anything like it before in history.

“This is another type of war, new in its intensity, ancient in its origin–war by guerrillas, subversives, insurgents, assassins, war by ambush instead of by combat; by infiltration, instead of aggression, seeking victory by eroding and exhausting the enemy instead of engaging him.” -JFK

8
wartooth6 8 points ago +8 / -0

I wonder what he meant by ancient in origin?

14
dontbanus 14 points ago +14 / -0

Good v. Evil

5
RallyinStJohnsWood 5 points ago +5 / -0

JFK was simply saying these tactics:

guerrillas, subversives, insurgents, assassins, ... ambush...infiltration... eroding and exhausting the enemy

have been used since ancient times.

5
Ophelia 5 points ago +5 / -0

Rome

1
SWORDofLIBERTY 1 point ago +1 / -0

And just how did Rome fall? What subversive religion entered Romes walls, claiming the very Gods they were worshiped, and were the foundation of culture in Roman society, were "fake" and blasphemed? Rome holds many secrets we still need to learn to save our planet.

2
IllKissYourBoobies 2 points ago +2 / -0

aliens.png

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
2
RallyinStJohnsWood 2 points ago +2 / -0

He got assassins, right ?

2
SpezLovesHisBull 2 points ago +2 / -0

Traitors before invaders.

35
deleted 35 points ago +36 / -1
52
donaldismydad 52 points ago +53 / -1 (edited)

DECLASSIFY DNI REPORT NOW, FULL STOP, FULL DISCLOSURE!!!

10
tragician 10 points ago +10 / -0

So they can bury it? How about nah and just straight round up the commies.

27
kekkk 27 points ago +30 / -3

Can he VETO it though?

I thought they had a VETO proof majority.

45
deleted 45 points ago +45 / -0
28
McFatty7 28 points ago +28 / -0

It's close to the end of the Legislative year.

If President Trump waits until the very end, Congress barely has any time to override the veto.

If Congress doesn't override the veto in time before the end of the legislative year, the bill is neutralized and Congress has to start all over from scratch.

16
Uzaka123 16 points ago +16 / -0

He could just pocket veto it too by not signing it but also not vetoing it, it dies if the session ends before he signs it.

6
KeeptheChief 6 points ago +6 / -0

That's what I'd do, and maybe with the new House you have enough votes to block it.

4
McFatty7 4 points ago +4 / -0

A pocket veto is difficult to pull off because it requires Congress to be "out of session" for more than the 10 day-period to sign/veto.

Both the Senate & House get around this by designating someone saying 'they're in session', thus "resetting the clock".

If the President does nothing (no objection or action taken) without his signature, by default it would become law.

Especially with stimulus talks ongoing, this time it'll be next to impossible for Congress to leave DC.

18
Eroticaenthusiast 18 points ago +18 / -0

the bill wasn't the center of attention when it passed the house, When it gets tossed back down Reps may change their position on it.

14
BeefyBelisarius 14 points ago +14 / -0

Yeah, it's generally harder to get votes for a veto override than for the initial bill.

13
Sparks1017 13 points ago +13 / -0

Need 2/3 of both houses to override veto, no?

5
MAGAMAN300 5 points ago +5 / -0

Which may not be a easy tasks.

1
ProfessorOak 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes but I think both the house and the Senate passed this with an overwhelming majority. 19% voted nay in the house and I think it was something similar in the Senate.

6
BeefyBelisarius 6 points ago +6 / -0

Yep.

7
BidenHunter 7 points ago +7 / -0

I doubt they'll use it to override his veto, but we'll see.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
7
djt2020ftw 7 points ago +7 / -0

They have to revote to overwrite a veto. Only because a bill did have the necessary votes to make it law they still have to VOTE again to overwrite the veto.

35
MobilePede 35 points ago +35 / -0

Hopefully some of the names in the ccp leak end up being rino's staffers and dem staffers so we can start cleaning Congress

28
donaldismydad 28 points ago +28 / -0

staffers? how about actual members of congress like swallowswell? agreed pede, clean that ccp swamp out! out! out!

11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
9
mintscape 9 points ago +9 / -0

Just keep in mind that list is ONLY the CCP members in Shanghai, the government is infiltrated by the CCP at every level and most of the spies are not from Shanghai.

There are 90+ million CCP members, the list is under 2 million.

2
Creepy_Ginger 2 points ago +2 / -0

Any and all, we need to make an example to all traitors and foreign interference. Countries should be bombed, leaders should be killed if known to be apart of this attempt to destroy America. This is war, we'll treat it like one. Not attack the normal civilians, but to one fell swoop - destroy their entire operation.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
34
deleted 34 points ago +34 / -0
5
Amazing4bella 5 points ago +5 / -0

Top defence lawyer for 35 years in large Cdn city said he didn’t meet a policeman in his whole career who didn’t lie while under oath. Most clients were over charged and would plead guilty to lesser charges. He was disgusted at what the judicial system had become. The rot is world wide.

27
TopKeksWithFerns 27 points ago +30 / -3

I thought it was passed veto proof?

55
brother_red 55 points ago +55 / -0

They'll still have to vote to override the veto. We'll (once again) see who the commies in congress are.

29
J_Von_Random 29 points ago +29 / -0

The country is getting an education in all the little details no one ever pays attention to...

21
The_Litehaus_Abides 21 points ago +21 / -0

And this is where we'll once again flood their offices with calls and emails. If they want to bend over for the CCP, they'll have to answer for it to us.

4
deleted 4 points ago +6 / -2
10
mintscape 10 points ago +10 / -0

One implies the other, it tells the crooks that we are watching and we disapprove.

You can tell them when you call you will be primarying them nd also mention that the Supreme Court just approved voter fraud as legal so you'll be voting much more than once in that primary.

6
generated_name 6 points ago +6 / -0

You can threaten to do that when you flood their office with calls.

9
TopKeksWithFerns 9 points ago +9 / -0

Can anyone tell me what in this bill benefits china? I did a quick look and all I could find was China bit ching about us giving taiwanese military support and pro Hong Kong protestor support.

10
brother_red 10 points ago +12 / -2

Honestly, I really don't know the specifics.

But if President Trump said it, I'm going with it!

1
NihilistCaregiver 1 point ago +2 / -1

But if President Trump said it, I'm going with it!

dude

1
brother_red 1 point ago +2 / -1

So... He hasn't steered us wrong in the past.

I don't think he will start now.

7
deleted 7 points ago +8 / -1
2
ScrewReddit 2 points ago +3 / -1

He previously said that he'd veto it if it didn't include provisions to repeal Section 230. I assume he knows what we all suspect - that social media is heavily influenced by Chyna.

1
spezisacuckold 1 point ago +2 / -1

So... it will pass.

2
brother_red 2 points ago +2 / -0

Probably, yes, but we can still apply pressure.

2
AZTrumpFan 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't think Trump is so much focused on what IS in the bill, rather that it doesn't repeal section 230. He's making it clear that that needs to be done. They know he's going to be inaugurated on Jan 20th, so he's essentially telling his kids to go clean up their room or they can't go outside and play. He wants 230 repealed,and until they do that he's gonna keep vetoing their attempts to skip it and go play.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
22
otistoole 22 points ago +23 / -1

So fucking sick of this shit. Just nuke China and do the world a favor

6
One-Man_Riot 6 points ago +6 / -0

"Nuke the whales?!?"

"Gotta nuke somethin'"

"Touché"

5
LuvHarambe 5 points ago +5 / -0

“Joy to the world, the teacher’s dead! We barbecued her head! Don’t worry about the body we flushed it down the potty!”

Old Simpsons were the best Simpsons

5
LUXURY_USERNAME 5 points ago +5 / -0

PRECISION STRIKE MOABS

0
Major_Nutt 0 points ago +1 / -1

No, nukes. Irradiate their land, burn the cities, ruin their soil and water. Make it impossible for them to wage war at all.

3
Modus_Pwninz 3 points ago +3 / -0

We don't need nukes anymore - Kinetic bombardment is the new nuke.

Google "Rods from God" - apparently it's real shit.

Also DOD came out and said China and Russia both have DEW's (Direct Energy Weapons) - which means I'd assume we do as well.

The bad news is that they're going to use this shit. You're probably going to see mass death on American soil in the future. If you live in a city, gtfo. If you live anywhere near a base, gtfo.

1
Hawkman 1 point ago +1 / -0

I live near a city and a few bases. Fuck.

1
Modus_Pwninz 1 point ago +1 / -0

Move, lol.

First of all, living in or near a city is fucking SHIT-TIER existence. Taxes are double for the convenience of being near a bunch of fuckwits? Yeah, no thanks.

If I could right now, I would actually sell my house in rural America and go fully off-grid. I have enough money saved and belongings to sell that I could probably do it, but the wife wouldn't go for it. Maybe in a few years when real estate tanks so I can get 100 acres for like 12 silver nickels lol

1
Major_Nutt 1 point ago +1 / -0

Rods from God don't fuck up soil and water for years to come, denying the enemy the most basic of provisions.

1
Modus_Pwninz 1 point ago +1 / -0

The issue is that nuclear fallout drifts with the wind. If you really bombarded China with nukes, that shit would fall on us...for thousands of years.

That's why two nukes were dropped on enemies and it never happened again - it's dirty business.

It's also why all the Japanese men won't fuck those cute Japanese girls because sleeping with a cartoon pillow is more erotic to them - that's some nuclear fallout shit mang.

1
otistoole 1 point ago +1 / -0

I do live near grissom AFB and have seen all kinds of cool drones and shit in the sky

0
AZTrumpFan 0 points ago +1 / -1

God's been doing basically that Himself lately. You don't see anything about it because both their media and ours are wholly owned by the CCP, but their country is teetering on the edge of collapse. Floods,hurricanes, diseases, locusts, collapsing economy, revolts, you name it.

21
deleted 21 points ago +22 / -1
16
Modus_Pwninz 16 points ago +16 / -0

That's cool and all, but it got over 2/3 votes. They will simply override the veto by voting the exact same way they just did.

These fucktards also voted 100-to-0 to give H1B visa holders American jobs.

There isn't a single Patriot in all of congress. If a nuke were dropped while they were in session, it would actually be a great victory for the country. That's where we are.

15
TheNewRepublic 15 points ago +16 / -1

They want do anything about 230 and want to change the names of historical bases. Fuck the commies.

14
BabbleRabble 14 points ago +14 / -0

CHY-NOPE!

13
Wesmacker 13 points ago +14 / -1

Complete trash, like 66% of congress.

13
TopKeksWithFerns 13 points ago +13 / -0

Can anyone tell me what in this bill benefits china? I did a quick look and all I could find was China bit ching about us giving taiwanese military support and pro Hong Kong protestor support

13
Wtf_socialismreally 13 points ago +14 / -1

He wanted section 230 repealed in the bill, because of China's control of Big Tech.

I'm not sure how people forgot this.

5
no_further 5 points ago +5 / -0

This could be something. The timelines for getting circuit board manufacturing out of problem countries (I assume China) are REALLY slow:

(1) ESTABLISHMENT OF REQUIRED PERCENTAGES.—In establishing the certification process under subsection (a), the Secretary shall establish and publish increasing percentages of values of the covered printed circuit boards under subsection (a) to be complied with by appropriate contractors and subcontractors, based on—

(A) assessment of covered nation capacity to supply printed circuit boards, over time;

(B) assessment of threats to national security capabilities from use of printed circuit boards from non-covered nations;

(C) economic benefits accrued by non-covered nations which would otherwise be accrued by covered nations;

(D) achieving a goal of production of 100 percent of manufacture and assembly of printed circuit boards in covered nations within ten years; and

(E) other criteria as determined appropriate.

(2) MINIMUM PERCENTAGES.—The percentages established by the Secretary under this subsection shall, in any case, be equal to or greater than, unless specifically directed by the Secretary for an individual contract or subcontract—

(A) 25 percent by October 1, 2023;

(B) 50 percent by October 1, 2025;

(C) 75 percent by October 1, 2029; and

(D) 100 percent by October 1, 2032.

4
no_further 4 points ago +4 / -0

yes, Covered Nation is not China.

(2) the term “covered nation” means—

(A) the United States;

(B) a member nation of the national technology and industrial base under section 2500 of title 10, United States Code; or

(C) a nation that has agreed, in compliance with section 36 of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2776) and section 2457 of title 10, United States Code—

(i) to comply with agreements with foreign governments requiring the United States to purchase supplies from foreign sources for the purposes of offsetting sales made by the United States Government or United States firms under approved programs serving defense requirements; or

(ii) along with the United States Government, to remove barriers to purchases of supplies produced in the other country or services performed by sources of the other country; or

(D) any country, other than the People's Republic of China, the Russian Federation, Iran, or the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, that the Secretary designates, upon a determination to be published in the Federal Register, that accepting covered printed circuit boards from which—

(i) is in the national security interests of the United States; and

(ii) does not pose a significant risk to national security systems.

4
Feelsgoodman 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'm curious as well

3
no_further 3 points ago +3 / -0

see below

1
Feelsgoodman 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thanks!

3
no_further 3 points ago +3 / -0

really weak language on college funding

SEC. 1090. RESTRICTIONS ON CONFUCIUS INSTITUTES. (a) Definition.—In this section, the term “Confucius Institute” means a cultural institute directly or indirectly funded by the Government of the People’s Republic of China.

(b) Restrictions On Confucius Institutes.—An institution of higher education or other postsecondary educational institution (referred to in this section as an “institution”) shall not be eligible to receive Federal funds from the Department of Education (except funds under title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1070 et seq.) or other Department of Education funds that are provided directly to students) unless the institution ensures that any contract or agreement between the institution and a Confucius Institute includes clear provisions that—

(1) protect academic freedom at the institution;

(2) prohibit the application of any foreign law on any campus of the institution; and

(3) grant full managerial authority of the Confucius Institute to the institution, including full control over what is being taught, the activities carried out, the research grants that are made, and who is employed at the Confucius Institute.

1
no_further 1 point ago +1 / -0

https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/6395

let's read it and see if we can find something

2
TopKeksWithFerns 2 points ago +3 / -1

I see a ton of pork, and a amendment requiring congressional certification if insurrection act is used.. so far

13
Okieshartpostdoke 13 points ago +13 / -0

Can't even imagine how retarded the comments to that are

13
CommieCrats 13 points ago +13 / -0

RINOCOMMIES LOVE SLAVE LABOR LIKE THE DEMS!

11
Merciless_Win_Update 11 points ago +11 / -0

SEIZE ALL CCP LAND PROPERTY IN THE USA!

NOW!

9
Ghostphaez 9 points ago +9 / -0

How about we seize the land of the scumbag traitors in our Federal and state governments who ALLOWED them to buy land here in the first place?!

4
Merciless_Win_Update 4 points ago +4 / -0

That too.

1
Kekistancoffee 1 point ago +2 / -1

What if I added that states like Texas and Utah should seize back the land the federal government stole from THEM to make into parks that nobody is allowed to visit?

Not really pertinent to the CCP discussion, but the whole national parks scheme was clearly a land grab not unlike what the CCP would have done, and probably HAVE done in China.

11
trump_is_lord 11 points ago +12 / -1

I love you, President Trump. Thank you.

8
Brulz_Lulz 8 points ago +8 / -0

It's already starting. Democrats and RINO's are trying to sell out this country to China.

4
RiverFenix 4 points ago +5 / -1

No, it's already Ending. Democrats and RINOs tried to sell out the country to China.

Now they all lose.

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
4
WinningDotWin 4 points ago +4 / -0

I think the first US politicians to go down might be RINOS like Georgia's Governor and Sec of State.

It sets up the narrative for the American public that this is a Patriot vs CCP issue, and not D vs R, even though the D party is 99.99% corrupt while the R party is probably closer to 75% corrupt.

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
7
deleted 7 points ago +8 / -1 (edited)
7
circusmonkey 7 points ago +10 / -3

Didn't they pass it with a veto-proof majority?

7
richmomz 7 points ago +7 / -0

They have to vote again to overcome the veto - if POTUS sits on it long enough it will expire and force them to do it all over again. It won't stop it completely, but it makes life difficult for the swamp scum in Congress and I'm ok with that.

7
dougkeenan 7 points ago +7 / -0

Let them vote for China.

In public.

Things happen in public.

5
spezisacuckold 5 points ago +5 / -0

Shit won’t happen. People will forget by the end of the day.

4
dougkeenan 4 points ago +4 / -0

Those that forget aren't making shit happen.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
7
JohnMcCainsTumors 7 points ago +7 / -0

They aren't even trying to hide it anymore it's really time to grab our guns and clean this fucking country up

7
JohnCClark 7 points ago +7 / -0

No surprise when half of our Representatives are representing China!

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
6
MAGAWookie 6 points ago +6 / -0

Stop playing games and get our military rounding people up!

6
Thathurtsmyfeelings1 6 points ago +7 / -1

Then what?

6
becray3point0 6 points ago +6 / -0

There is absolutely no reason at all for him to sign the bill. Every reason not to.

6
Austroman 6 points ago +6 / -0

DEMOCRATS HAVE THE NUMBERS WITH RINOS TO OVERRIDE VETO.

CONTACT YOUR REPRESENTATIVE AND SENATORS AND URGE THEM TO VOTE AGAINST THE BILL/VETO OVERRIDE.

6
UnderCoverTrumper 6 points ago +6 / -0

THAT'S MY PRESIDENT

6
de9ebkmd7 6 points ago +6 / -0

So the GOP controlled Senate passed this bill? I hate the GOP more than I hate the communists because at least the communists don't pretend to be on my side.

6
FOUR_MORE_TERMS 6 points ago +7 / -1

Don't forget to KeEp ThE mAjOrItY in Georgia!!

Why didn't the GOP senate add section 230 to the NDAA like Trump demanded?

Why did two GOP senators say "now is not the time" to talk about section 230?

Why are 4 GOP senators working with Chuck Schumer and a Soros-funded group on Biden's proposed amnesty bill RIGHT NOW?

Yeah, yeah, vote GOP!!

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
5
OZ00MSTALLGEESE 5 points ago +5 / -0

FUCK CHINA. DO NOT BUY CHINESE PRODUCT, DO NOT SUPPORT CHINESE BUSINESS. DONT EVEN EAT CHINESE FOOD YOU FAT CUCK. END THE CCP. END CHINESE COMMUNISM. FREE LAOBAIXING. FUCK CHINA.

5
QuietSpark 5 points ago +5 / -0

We are at war with China.

5
svlem 5 points ago +6 / -1

based

5
OrngeManBad 5 points ago +5 / -0

Veto it! America First!

5
txladyvoter 5 points ago +5 / -0

Make sure the veto is not overridden!

5
Mr1776 5 points ago +5 / -0

All this shit is in your face now. Hollywood is open about it. Watch the movie 'Game Night', for instance. I'm not gonna give an in depth review of the movie - it would take too long. But, at the end of it, after she announces she's pregnant, they debate about whether to teach the kid Mandarin or Cantonese because "the future is China".

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
5
Arden 5 points ago +5 / -0

Donald Trump, don't trust China! China is asshoe!