8248
() 🦅 Trump Tweet 🦅
posted ago by MaMa_JuJu_BooBoo ago by MaMa_JuJu_BooBoo +8249 / -1
Comments (657)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
0
ThisIsReality 0 points ago +1 / -1

I will just leave this here.

IMHO 0-deltas are the weakest evidence of there being anything to Q.

0
lash 0 points ago +1 / -1

Might be because you don't know the math.

Did you do the math? Bet you didn't.

1
ThisIsReality 1 point ago +1 / -0

I didn't make the claim that these coincidences are out of the ordinary.

You made the claim. Burden of proof is on you.

1
lash 1 point ago +1 / -0

What claim, smartass..

I'm responding referring to the 0-delta-evidence regarding someones claim (originated from MSM) that Q is a larp. It is simply impossible not to be in coordination.

Your garbage wikipedia-link on the other hand did not do shit with that.

All you need to do is check out what the Q-posts are all about. Why do YOU oppose it so when it has been much needed fuel to the fire of liberty in regards to global spread.

1
ThisIsReality 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't oppose. I am just saying 0-deltas are the weakest evidence of Q having any truth to it.

And I did look at the data, a little bit. Only 28 out of 53 times did Q post before POTUS within the same minute. To be fair, I should also count Q posting in the minute just before a POTUS tweet… but the time displayed to normies would look different, so I did not.

This is counting all 4952 Q posts and 55089 Trump tweets (from 2011-08-02 until 2020-11-06, with 22787 Trump tweets since Q started posting). Plenty of data to do a statistical analysis to predict a pattern of Trump tweets, enough to reduce the 1440 minutes per days to much less than 365 (which would still be 6 hours). At that point, what are the odds of random events occuring together over 4 years… pretty damn high.

Q's 0.57% success rate of "0-deltas" over 4 years is simply underwhelming.