well the "method" itself is just checking if a ballot was folded or not... doesn't take a huge brain to do that, and the idea that he does by "analysis", yeah well that works, but.... it's just lame.
it's more subtle than that. people have been talking about "checking for ballot fold" for weeks, by visually checking if ballots were fold-free.
now the guy comes up with a very complicated way to do the same thing that could be done just by eye. take a piece of paper, do you need equipment in order to know whether it has been folded or not?
well the guy is just talking about a multi-million dollar idea to check for ballot folds...
I'm all fine with this. The part where I'm cautious is where guys from our side start to argue everywhere that "but this highly recognized scientist and inventor said that........". instant decredibilisation.
DEPORT!!! LARP ALERT
Now comes the part where you provide evidence that the method he advocates in the video is a LARP.
well the "method" itself is just checking if a ballot was folded or not... doesn't take a huge brain to do that, and the idea that he does by "analysis", yeah well that works, but.... it's just lame.
So your argument now is not that it wouldn’t work, your argument is that he’s not smart and that it’s lame? Remind us how this is a LARP again?
it's more subtle than that. people have been talking about "checking for ballot fold" for weeks, by visually checking if ballots were fold-free.
now the guy comes up with a very complicated way to do the same thing that could be done just by eye. take a piece of paper, do you need equipment in order to know whether it has been folded or not?
well the guy is just talking about a multi-million dollar idea to check for ballot folds...
I'm all fine with this. The part where I'm cautious is where guys from our side start to argue everywhere that "but this highly recognized scientist and inventor said that........". instant decredibilisation.