CIA has no control over any cryptocurrency, it all boils down to disagreements in scaling of the blockchain. 1MB/10min is enough, 32+MB/10min with regular increases will eventually make the blockchain centralized, allowing authorities to steal it as they're the only ones who can afford to host it. Stay away from Btrash and use the original Bitcoin instead.
Or why not Ethereum and Monero, with dynamic block size or sharding, two techs that improves the scaling and distribute the load to avoid centralization.
The original bitcoin has been taken over and is a scam. Original bitcoiners saw it go down, saw the CIA takeover. It's not just a simple dispute- it is impossible to have more than 200k transactions on bitcoin in a day. The only reason it has such an inflated value is because it is propped up by something called 'tether'. Bitcoin cash us the original bitcoin, while bitcoin is a Jack Dorsey fan club ponzi scheme. But by all means, do your thing.
Tell me how CIA could possibly take over the worlds largest decentralized 100% open-source network with over 10,000 nodes, and 151.03 EH/s hash rate. And what exactly do you think they're doing to interfere beside attempting the obvious traditional attack vectors?
it is impossible to have more than 200k transactions on bitcoin in a day
It was back in 2017, today lightning network exist, peer to peer direct transactions off chain, cheaper, instant and more anonymous.
The only reason it has such an inflated value is because it is propped up by something called 'tether'.
Tether is paired with all cryptocurrencies, including Btrash. While I agree that tether is shit and does have a negative impact on cryptocurrencies in general it's just a stupid thing to pull up when arguing which of two cryptocurrencies are the better one. Tether is really just USD without regulation and bureaucracy.
Bitcoin cash us the original bitcoin
Most people, myself included would disagree, but I respect your opinion.
while bitcoin is a Jack Dorsey fan club ponzi scheme.
You're talking as if Bitcoin where some kind of hive mind or company, it's the opposite in fact, and most people don't like Jack Dorsey. What you're doing here is guilt by association, like if you where to get rid of your car just because you learn that Jack Dorsey has a car of the same brand.
Ponzi scheme? Craig Wright is the crybaby who pump and dump his shit coin all the time, he's also the one running around suing everyone trying to prove his Satoshi, pathetic.
All you need to do to subvert Bitcoin is to control a majority of the nodes, i.e. 50%+1.
Do you really think an organization with an unlimited budget can’t purchase and manage 5,001 nodes? An unlimited black-budget with no congressional oversight, no less.
Bitcoin is a CIA ponzi. Bitcoin Cash, maybe.
CIA has no control over any cryptocurrency, it all boils down to disagreements in scaling of the blockchain. 1MB/10min is enough, 32+MB/10min with regular increases will eventually make the blockchain centralized, allowing authorities to steal it as they're the only ones who can afford to host it. Stay away from Btrash and use the original Bitcoin instead.
Or why not Ethereum and Monero, with dynamic block size or sharding, two techs that improves the scaling and distribute the load to avoid centralization.
The original bitcoin has been taken over and is a scam. Original bitcoiners saw it go down, saw the CIA takeover. It's not just a simple dispute- it is impossible to have more than 200k transactions on bitcoin in a day. The only reason it has such an inflated value is because it is propped up by something called 'tether'. Bitcoin cash us the original bitcoin, while bitcoin is a Jack Dorsey fan club ponzi scheme. But by all means, do your thing.
One theory I've heard is that the CIA created Bitcoin.
https://cryptopotato.com/the-cia-secretly-owned-crypto-ag-did-they-secretly-create-bitcoin-opinion/
I don't know if this is true but it wouldn't surprise me.
Tell me how CIA could possibly take over the worlds largest decentralized 100% open-source network with over 10,000 nodes, and 151.03 EH/s hash rate. And what exactly do you think they're doing to interfere beside attempting the obvious traditional attack vectors?
It was back in 2017, today lightning network exist, peer to peer direct transactions off chain, cheaper, instant and more anonymous.
Tether is paired with all cryptocurrencies, including Btrash. While I agree that tether is shit and does have a negative impact on cryptocurrencies in general it's just a stupid thing to pull up when arguing which of two cryptocurrencies are the better one. Tether is really just USD without regulation and bureaucracy.
Most people, myself included would disagree, but I respect your opinion.
You're talking as if Bitcoin where some kind of hive mind or company, it's the opposite in fact, and most people don't like Jack Dorsey. What you're doing here is guilt by association, like if you where to get rid of your car just because you learn that Jack Dorsey has a car of the same brand.
Ponzi scheme? Craig Wright is the crybaby who pump and dump his shit coin all the time, he's also the one running around suing everyone trying to prove his Satoshi, pathetic.
All you need to do to subvert Bitcoin is to control a majority of the nodes, i.e. 50%+1.
Do you really think an organization with an unlimited budget can’t purchase and manage 5,001 nodes? An unlimited black-budget with no congressional oversight, no less.