118
Unpopular opinion: 3 trump appointed scotus judges might be saving the correct ruling for the most definitive cases with least controversy.
posted ago by Iforgetpassword ago by Iforgetpassword +118 / -0

I am saying this only because they are appointed by trump. Failing 3 out of 3? My president is better than this. Hear me out.The texas lawsuit does not contain any arguments concerning frauds. Wouldn't our case be stronger with lawsuits containing evidences of frauds? We could achieve full audit and throw out fake votes with trump lawyers' cases, and win straight up without risking it to state legislature with rinos. They could be faking "neutrality" in dems voter's eye now, be to more convincing when it really matters.

15 comments
15 comments share save hide report block hide child comments
Comments (15)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
▲ 0 ▼
– Iforgetpassword [S] 0 points ago +1 / -1

We have overwhelming proof. Not hard as long as they are not democrat judges

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– TrumpTrollMaster 3 points ago +3 / -0

We have overwhelming proof of IMPROPRIETY, not fraud.

We also have overwhelming proof of INTERFERENCE, not fraud.

Fraud is -VERY- hard to prove even if it is obvious. The laws for fraud have very high and stupid standards.

Again, this is about being a loyal person. Trump is hugely disappointed that these justices won't even HEAR the merits.

permalink parent save report block reply