118
posted ago by Iforgetpassword ago by Iforgetpassword +118 / -0

I am saying this only because they are appointed by trump. Failing 3 out of 3? My president is better than this. Hear me out.The texas lawsuit does not contain any arguments concerning frauds. Wouldn't our case be stronger with lawsuits containing evidences of frauds? We could achieve full audit and throw out fake votes with trump lawyers' cases, and win straight up without risking it to state legislature with rinos. They could be faking "neutrality" in dems voter's eye now, be to more convincing when it really matters.

Comments (15)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
3
1776Widowmaker 3 points ago +4 / -1

From what i read into it the court couldn't look at it because the damage wasn't done yet(electors chosen) and after the damage is done the same case would have standing. Think they jumped the gun on that one. Also i think ther courts are guiding the way for a successful case like the op was saying. Just my opinion. Trump stays in office. But don't bet the ranch.