3993
Comments (116)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
3
orangemanwins202020 3 points ago +3 / -0

obvious this looks very shady...

but, why weren't they destroyed to hide the evidence if shady?

there must be extra ballots printed in general for every election...

again, this does look very suspicous but what does this prove?

someone please fill in some details...

4
DL535 4 points ago +4 / -0

I have to agree here. Since potential turnout is unknown, especially in this election when no one was sure how many mail in ballots or in-person ballots would be necessary, it would have made sense to print more ballots than would be needed. It therefore isn't evidence of a crime that extra ballots exist. But GA voters have a right to know what procedures were in place to ensure that no party activists had access to these election night and later, and from what we've seen, I don't think there is anything the state could do or say that would allay people's suspicions, since we have already seen voluminous evidence of cheating.

7
neehl 7 points ago +7 / -0

Not a crime that extra ballots exist. But anything in regards to election, whether used or unused ballots should be stored together for the required 22 months post election. The fact that someone came across pallets of ballots in some random warehouse means these extras weren’t secured at all and further gives credence to fraud, especially since they kept “finding” ballots afterwards.