1191
Comments (82)
sorted by:
79
Tucso 79 points ago +82 / -3

I don’t understand this at all... Supreme Court is going to puss out. Leaked talks from the clerks confirmed Roberts is scared of mass rioting.

69
becky21k1 69 points ago +69 / -0

Surely he's not so dumb as to believe there won't be riots if things go the other way and SCOTUS does nothing

58
Fluffy_Indigo 58 points ago +60 / -2

Conservatives have never shown a willingness to do more than protest.

51
Gooseontheloose 51 points ago +52 / -1

There's a foul smell in the air. I reckon this election may push us over the edge.

48
TearsMakeTheBestAmmo 48 points ago +48 / -0

May? Its now or never. There isn't going to be another fair election Nd probably hasn't been one in decades. The uniparty wins for decades, if not longer.

31
thelastlast 31 points ago +32 / -1

it is now or never. but we wait for the Go from Commander in Chief.

-4
Smubbs -4 points ago +8 / -12

He won’t give that

15
dixond 15 points ago +15 / -0

You're wrong.

18
AFLP 18 points ago +21 / -3

I’m concerned. We couldn’t even get 100,000 people to DC yesterday. It was a big let down for me. However, seeing the number of patriots that stayed after to fight through the night reminded me it only takes a small percentage to get shit done.

27
OtherwiseSafe 27 points ago +27 / -0

Some of us just believe that protesting in a hostile city, disarmed is unwise, but are still fully committed to what must come.

17
sgttoporbottoms 17 points ago +17 / -0

Mods here haven’t done a great job of stickying things that help with protest organization. They’re stepping up their game though

5
pepperconchobhar 5 points ago +5 / -0

We need a separate organization page. A place where we can keep everything organized by place and time.

3
deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1
2
nocompromise 2 points ago +2 / -0

I went to one of the other priests in DC but flying is expensive. If Biden i wins though I’m going full 1776.

12
itbj2 12 points ago +12 / -0

I agree with this but if they do start something it will be infinitely more bloody than what BLM or Antifa could ever do.

6
sm0kie420 6 points ago +6 / -0

Yup. If the scotus hands Trump the victory its gonna be George Floyd x 10

4
AFLP 4 points ago +4 / -0

Bring in some Rick DeSantis riot rules and let’s get it going.

6
420weedscopes 6 points ago +6 / -0

Now is the time for action if any

5
Rumblebee 5 points ago +6 / -1

OKC? Have the 90s been forgotten?

1
Buchwild 1 point ago +1 / -0

People like us won't stoop to the levels of Democrats. I can promise you I would never take to the street and firebomb buildings or beat up senior citizens so yes, that makes us a safer bet.

1
becky21k1 1 point ago +1 / -0

If the senior citizen is Biden?

-2
deleted -2 points ago +2 / -4
8
becky21k1 8 points ago +8 / -0

Everyone gets pushed to a limit at some point. With so many out of work for no good reason there's no job to worry about.

21
Thep1mp 21 points ago +23 / -2

Rioting from the left should be the least of his worries. The result from his sedition may well be more violent and much closer to home than he might like. He should consider his actions wisely.

14
AFLP 14 points ago +14 / -0

That’s what I’m saying. The choice is riots or war. Not riots or protests.

11
Okiedoked2 11 points ago +11 / -0

Yeah pussy Dem riots won't be shit compared to 75mm pissed off and armed Patriots. He's better damn well tread fucking lightly. They are being paid to riot and we will volunteer patriotically to fuck then up and hang traitors high! Do not fück with our freedoms.

13
deleted 13 points ago +13 / -0
6
Damiano 6 points ago +8 / -2

The "junior justices" bit was the give away that it's bullshit. Chief Justice & Associate Justices. That's it.

People need to stop posting their fantasies.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
3
theglynn 3 points ago +3 / -0

Click on the post and it takes you the documents

5
TruthWillOut 5 points ago +5 / -0

I call BS on the "Leaked talks from the clerks confirmed Roberts is scared of mass rioting" rumor. I have not read or heard anything remotely close to that being true.

Credible source or DEPORT.

29
4cdarth 29 points ago +29 / -0

Quick search for what this means cause I had no idea what it entails.

A (writ of) mandamus is an order from a court to an inferior government official ordering the government official to properly fulfill their official duties or correct an abuse of discretion.

Uh oh.....

6
AtomicShnoz 6 points ago +8 / -2

the court will say no. soooo.

24
deleted 24 points ago +24 / -0
32
AtomicShnoz 32 points ago +32 / -0

They are asking the court to force the defendants to perform some action. kinda like a cease and desist but in reverse. the court will say "no"

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
8
eclectic22 8 points ago +10 / -2

Absolutely nothing

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
4
ShartMaster 4 points ago +5 / -1

Try Hunter02!

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
23
deleted 23 points ago +23 / -0
8
AsaNisiMAGA 8 points ago +8 / -0

I heard that in Andrew Dice Clay's voice.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
17
JohnCocktoastin 17 points ago +17 / -0

It is asking for SCOTUS to order the lower court to hear the case. Because the plaintiffs have standing, the claims are not barred by laches, the federal court has jurisdiction to hear this election related case, and the court has power to issue the requested relief.

11
deleted 11 points ago +12 / -1
5
populist_nationalist 5 points ago +5 / -0

IT'S IN ALL CAPS THOUGH!

7
AtomicShnoz 7 points ago +7 / -0

i heard ivermectin will clear that up

2
MNMathtic 2 points ago +2 / -0

Only if used as prophylaxis

6
Ridiculousposter 6 points ago +6 / -0

For us simple country folk, what does that mean in English?

6
deleted 6 points ago +7 / -1
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
6
Auroraalpha 6 points ago +6 / -0

Mreh, they'll say "you haven't exhausted your options yet". Any lawyer pedes want state if there are any other writs the court can issue before mandamus?

2
tdwinner2020 2 points ago +2 / -0

Or some other excuse. I think Trump needs to exhaust the judicial options, which should be by tomorrow night at the latest. That will start the clock ticking on the EO report due no later than the 18th. Then it's EO time.

5
ANTI_Globalist12 5 points ago +5 / -0

What is that , a magic spell ???

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
4
ArtistWarrior 4 points ago +4 / -0

This is so confusing. It looks like this is what happened:

Sidney Powell filed two Writs of Mandamus, dated December 12, 2020.

A Write of Mandamus has been termed a "wakening call" to sleeping officials, to wake up and do their jobs; "Mandamus" means "we command"; From the disgusting POS Wiki: "Mandamus Mandamus is a judicial remedy in the form of an order from a court to any government, subordinate court, corporation, or public authority, to do some specific act which that body is obliged under law to do, and which is in the nature of public duty, and in certain cases one of a statutory duty...."

It looks like she's trying to use the power of the actual law to force these legislatures to decertify their election results due to the provable, massive fraud.

I wish I could give Kurt Schlichter a call and just ask him.

4
slaphappy2 4 points ago +4 / -0

Once patriots finally realize that Washington, DC is just one big collection of enemy targets - they will shift from PROTECTING to something different.

Just a prediction I am making as a student of history.

4
becky21k1 4 points ago +4 / -0

https://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/writ+of+mandamus#:~:text=A%20writ%20or%20order%20of%20mandamus%20is%20an,issued%20in%20a%20case%20that%20has%20already%20begun.

The Supreme Court observed in Kerr that the writ of mandamus was traditionally used by federal courts only to confine an inferior court to a lawful exercise of its jurisdiction, or to compel an inferior court to exercise its authority when it had a duty to do so. The Court also noted that mandamus is available only in exceptional cases because it is so disruptive of the judicial process, creating disorder and delay in the trial. The writ would have been appropriate, opined the Court, if the trial court had wrongly decided an issue, if failure to reverse that decision would irreparably injure a party, and if there was no other method for relief. Because the prison officials could claim a privilege to withhold certain documents, and had the right to have the documents reviewed by a judge prior to release to the opposing party, other remedies existed and the writ was inappropriate.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
0
GamebredPitbull 0 points ago +1 / -1

BREAKING: NOTHING WILL HAPPEN.