Win uses cookies necessary for site functionality, as well as for personalization. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies as described in our Privacy Policy.
What about Soviet defector Yuri Bezmenov, who tried to warn Americans about communist infiltration of American universities, education systems and news media in the 1980s?
Yes, Yuri Bezmenov was amazing, I think his lecture on Subversion was incredible. Today, what he spoke about could possibly be termed Cultural Marxism/Critical Theory.
Yuri was 100% right, his job was theoretically done before he even escaped to Canada and USA. The Frankfurt School "intellectuals" before WW2, the subversive intellectuals evicted from Germany to Columbia University, began to infect every apparatus of society, especially: media/entertainment, education and politics.
There's a shabby kind of romance to Marxism, it has a mystique that capitalism doesn't have in the minds of impressionable students, and the professors who were once the students of professors who were students of Marcuse or Adorno: Fighting in the streets! Rousing speeches with vehement gestures by professional revolutionaries! (Everyone's seen the grainy footage of Lenin or Trotsky soap-box orating to a worked-up crowd.) All that action-adventure drama! All those opportunities to destroy everything your own resentment projects as the cause of your misery! And at the end of the road, the golden rainbow of the Worker's Paradise! If the road is paved with cracked skulls (as Lenin put it gleefully), so what? Noble humanitarian ends justify the most brutal means. And when absolute power is achieved? Well, those means are just so useful when it comes to holding on to it, aren't they? But now we're no longer liberators, we're dictators over the Proletariat... No problem, we'll just call it "the Dictatorship OF the Proletariat." And don't worry, the State will eventually "wither away."
As for capitalism: Despite Ayn Rand's attempts to romanticize heroic entrepreneurs, Schumpeter was right: capitalism is based on Enlightenment Rationalism, it doesn't appeal to resentment and the sense of grievance or the moral narcissism of "social justice" activism, it doesn't offer a secular religion with its eschatological promises and fanatical certainty. It doesn't appeal to the herd, but to individuals with initiative and a hyperactive work ethic. It doesn't promise that the State will take care of your every need and spare you the discomfort of facing your personal failings, it dares to suggest you should just do your best and take responsibility for the result, good or not so good. Yuk, common sense!
Marxism is one culmination of the German Counter-Enlightenment that also (ultimately) gave us National Socialism. Marxist theory hides its basic lunacy behind the faux-rational pseudo-mysticism of a careerist charlatan named Hegel. Communism shouts at the top of its voice, capitalism is just--reasonable. It talks about enlightened self-interest. Bo-o-o-ring. Marxism lets you hide your most selfish drives behind a pose of collectivist altruism. Capitalism tries to persuade, okay, SELL itself. Marxism threatens you when it can't seduce you with its rebel-with-a-cause glamor; laugh in its face and it throws a Molotov cocktail in yours.
Schumpeter also pointed out that Marxism has an especially toxic appeal to intellectuals, above all in Academia. For one thing, professors tend to fetishize THEORY, and Marxism is nothing if not theory-laden; it has room for all that verbal gas because practically speaking it's nothing but empty promises. That's one big reason why academics love it. The same professors who've never even met a factory worker, and would probably despise him if they did, absolutely LOVE the theory of the working class seizing the means of production. And just so they can be faculty-lounge heroes in their own minds, Althusser tells them "theory is praxis." So just by writing academic articles on demystifying bourgeois aestheticism you're on the front lines of the Struggle!
Schumpeter mentions another reason why Marxism gives academics such a boner: They resent the hell out of not having as much fame and clout as celebrities and politicians and, yes, successful capitalists, i.e., tycoons. What better way to gain power and glory than to subvert the system that doesn't recognize their supreme importance? They're the champions of all the other people oppressed by the sense of their own insignificance. But put these harmless-looking dweebs in power and they turn into the most vicious infighting self-serving bureaucratic beasts imaginable. All in the name of the People.
"And I only am escaped alone to tell thee." Not alone, there are plenty of smarter people who also escaped--like David Horowitz and Andrew Breitbart.
The eye of Sauros is surveiling all of us. It seems our entire establishment is hypnotized with lust for power and wealth--in love with the ring. Sauromans, flunkies to an evil Globalist power. In the final battle there are even Asiatic-looking barbarians riding elephants. (RINOS submitting to the CCP?) And we are fighting off the last siege. THAT is an action-adventure.
To follow this analogy, what's the ring and how do we destroy it? I mean, we need to shatter the illusion of utopia. We need to reform our elections, and we need to break the cycle of indoctrination. Anything else?
A hint, if you intentionally misspell a word, put it in quotation marks or italics. This way readers get a subtle hint that 1. it is intentionally written as it is and 2. bring awareness of potential special meanings given how it's written differently.
I too failed to see what you meant until I read your hint and was able to exclude the more probable reasons.
Marxism is the bad boy that your moody liquored up nihilistic teenage daughter dates because he's just so gosh darn "cool" and "edgy" and unemployed and he rides a motorcycle and swears a lot and because he's just such an awesome counter-culture noncomformist....
.... who is also a sadistic drug head and degenerate alchoholic with severe behavioral issues who knocks her up and spends half his wasted existence in and out of jail and over the the next 30 years he physically abuses and rapes her until he finally commits suicide with a single self inflicted gunshot wound to the head at the age of 49 ....
.... leaving his numerous bastard spawn to grow up to be just like their daddy.
Yikes, the Fonz in a "Mirror Mirror" Star Trek version of himself, wearing an eye patch and a sash and being all evil and stuff! Or maybe James Dean resurrected after the car wreck as the Dark Master in a Zombie Apocalypse flick? Or Marlon Brando. "What are you rebelling against?" "How much private property you got?"
Seriously, that's quite a detailed psychological profile, and it rings true to the way Marxism has (not) worked.
All of this is very fitting. But there is more than that.
There is the arrogance of intellectual and therefore moral superiority among students and professors, thinking they are some kind of about-to-be elite in society.
Yet they base their wisdom on abstractions over abstractions over abstractions. The issue is that the process of abstraction in itself has one major flaw: It erodes information that in itself may not be too relevant, but taken cumulatively over the process of multiple abstractions will sum up to be decisive.
The mere idea that "Capitalism exploits workers" are multiple leaps of abstract ideas, and they are so far away, that they are entirely disconnected from reality, and therefore entirely false. For one, the definition of Capitalism from Socialists is terrible - even so much that they can't make one up without already embedding "exploitation" into it. "Exploitation" also ignores the fact that these are bi-directionally voluntary transactions and the difference in provided value (which is relatively small btw) is a necessity.
A simple example: You have 10 people, each having the same work power over time (W). Each can work on their own and reach 5W each. Or: There is a business that already provides a platform for workers, where all the bureaucracy and nasty work is taken care of, where people can specialize into one area. Every of these workers working there would have 10W. Now, but you need to make profit off of it... so if you pay them equal to 8W, it's a win-win. They make more money than on their own (+3W), and you make 2W in difference as profit.
As an employee you don't have to care about so many things business owners have to, and you have the luxury of being able to bail out at any time and focus on your thing. All the administrative and bureaucratic nonsense which you may hate is entirely kept away from you. All the larger decision making that involves risks is kept away from you.
And this is what Marxists still call "exploitation." But it's only true if you strip off all the context... WHICH THEY DID.
Thanks, Pede. You may have guessed I was one of them. Guilty. Contrite. And angry with myself and my professors and colleagues for taking part in this tweedy LARP that turned out to be so fucking poisonous, it's on the verge of killing our democracy.
My Dad never took that step, wish he had. He was offered early retirement from teaching shortly after the DoE was created, and took it. He was smart then, but stayed thoroughly under the influence of the NEA and his brain has been nothing but mush for well over 10 years.
Did Yuri ever write a book about his insights? His lectures are wonderful, but I can imagine that they only contain a small portion of the knowledge he gathered while in the USSR.
All 4 of his steps are complete. He doesn't give any answers for that, but we can still receive guidance from his wisdom. If DJT doesn't concede by 1/6, he's not going to. If he does, we fight. If he crosses the Rubicon, we have 2 weeks to muster, clogging the streets of DC so nothing can move, and conclude appropriately.
It's crazy to think that he was eventually dismissed as nutty because his was accusing SO MANY PEOPLE of being commie. Turns out their infiltration ran deep and he was right all along.
One of the tactics of the communists has been to gaslight and strawman arguments, to depict their opposition as insane; slander and lies are their chief weapons.
Some of the tactics communists use include: gaslighting and strawman arguments, to depict their opposition as insane; slander and lies are their chief weapons.
I don't know for sure, but I imagine the attitude then was the same as now - some people were worried/warning about it, some were not buying it and/or actively against calling it out...but the commies were then and are now here.
They're just deeper entrenched now. And people will still do nothing about it.
Trump is literally the last hope for it - no other politician will ever be able to do this again. They know better now; they know we can still beat them if they don't rig it all.
everyone here is a "racist homophobic fascist transphobic xenophobic misogynistic cracker hick white supremacist" at all times to everyone in power and all their faggy little underlings and admirers
Cant lose when I never accepted the terms of the game. Your bosses housekeepers and security are on our side. Get rekt or learn a trade or skill to earn your keep when the power goes out.
Except his fashion sense. I get it was the fashion at the time, but in this photo it's rather unflattering of him and makes him look like some sort of proto-Nadler.
Fun fact: Before the 2000 election, there were no assigned party colors for election night maps and things had flipped back and forth on a fairly random basis. In the 2000 election, it was apparently important that the Democrat party not be associated with the color red.
I leave you to come to your own conclusions about why that was.
The news at that time was, as now, full of lies and misrepresentation. The public not only got tiny snippets of what was really happening, but the snippets were twisted and even plain falsehoods. The New York Times and others presented McCarthy as a rude and aggressive idiot and the opposing sides as reasonable and civil. However, some who requested court transcripts saw that McCarthy was intelligent and civil with great points, while his opposition greeted him with emotional ad hominem and slanders.
Correct. What played out back then was a carbon copy of the media gaslighting we have today. The New York Times has a long and storied history of running propaganda cover for treasonous communists
I remember they used to teach about this I’m history class. Calling it McCarthyism. Like it was a bad thing. They’re literally pumping out little communists yearly. I bought into all of it for a bit too. Climate, vegan, bullshit bullshit bullshit.
The Thirteen Colonies are represented as red and white stripes on Old Glory
Georgia was the bottom Colony
Can you guess its color on that grayscale map?
McCarthy was absolutely right. A true anticommunist, American patriot and a real leader.
Communist radicals in the state department lost China to the CCP by betraying Chiang Kai-shek and giving aid and comfort to Mao Zedong. Prominent public intellectuals and government officials committed treason against the United States, spying for Soviet intelligence as proven by the Venona intercepts. If McCarthy was listened to back then our country would be in a far better place than it is today
I can remember back in grade school they painted McCarthy as a paranoid nutjob ruining peoples' lives with the HUAC. It was only a few years ago I realized not only that McCarthy was right, but that he took one for the team and should've pushed harder. Sadly I don't think he even knew the extent of communist corruption.
We got so wrapped up with Muh Terrism, Muh Medicare 4 All, and let corporate America and our elites in universities and government sell out to the commies.
McCarthy was right.
What about Soviet defector Yuri Bezmenov, who tried to warn Americans about communist infiltration of American universities, education systems and news media in the 1980s?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QfvXwuZ-bok Try listening to the first five minutes, this guy is extremely well-spoken.
Yes, Yuri Bezmenov was amazing, I think his lecture on Subversion was incredible. Today, what he spoke about could possibly be termed Cultural Marxism/Critical Theory.
Yuri was 100% right, his job was theoretically done before he even escaped to Canada and USA. The Frankfurt School "intellectuals" before WW2, the subversive intellectuals evicted from Germany to Columbia University, began to infect every apparatus of society, especially: media/entertainment, education and politics.
It’s not even that their ideas are good and that’s why they prevail. They prevail because they SOUND and FEEL good and most people are fucking dumb.
There's a shabby kind of romance to Marxism, it has a mystique that capitalism doesn't have in the minds of impressionable students, and the professors who were once the students of professors who were students of Marcuse or Adorno: Fighting in the streets! Rousing speeches with vehement gestures by professional revolutionaries! (Everyone's seen the grainy footage of Lenin or Trotsky soap-box orating to a worked-up crowd.) All that action-adventure drama! All those opportunities to destroy everything your own resentment projects as the cause of your misery! And at the end of the road, the golden rainbow of the Worker's Paradise! If the road is paved with cracked skulls (as Lenin put it gleefully), so what? Noble humanitarian ends justify the most brutal means. And when absolute power is achieved? Well, those means are just so useful when it comes to holding on to it, aren't they? But now we're no longer liberators, we're dictators over the Proletariat... No problem, we'll just call it "the Dictatorship OF the Proletariat." And don't worry, the State will eventually "wither away."
As for capitalism: Despite Ayn Rand's attempts to romanticize heroic entrepreneurs, Schumpeter was right: capitalism is based on Enlightenment Rationalism, it doesn't appeal to resentment and the sense of grievance or the moral narcissism of "social justice" activism, it doesn't offer a secular religion with its eschatological promises and fanatical certainty. It doesn't appeal to the herd, but to individuals with initiative and a hyperactive work ethic. It doesn't promise that the State will take care of your every need and spare you the discomfort of facing your personal failings, it dares to suggest you should just do your best and take responsibility for the result, good or not so good. Yuk, common sense!
Marxism is one culmination of the German Counter-Enlightenment that also (ultimately) gave us National Socialism. Marxist theory hides its basic lunacy behind the faux-rational pseudo-mysticism of a careerist charlatan named Hegel. Communism shouts at the top of its voice, capitalism is just--reasonable. It talks about enlightened self-interest. Bo-o-o-ring. Marxism lets you hide your most selfish drives behind a pose of collectivist altruism. Capitalism tries to persuade, okay, SELL itself. Marxism threatens you when it can't seduce you with its rebel-with-a-cause glamor; laugh in its face and it throws a Molotov cocktail in yours.
Schumpeter also pointed out that Marxism has an especially toxic appeal to intellectuals, above all in Academia. For one thing, professors tend to fetishize THEORY, and Marxism is nothing if not theory-laden; it has room for all that verbal gas because practically speaking it's nothing but empty promises. That's one big reason why academics love it. The same professors who've never even met a factory worker, and would probably despise him if they did, absolutely LOVE the theory of the working class seizing the means of production. And just so they can be faculty-lounge heroes in their own minds, Althusser tells them "theory is praxis." So just by writing academic articles on demystifying bourgeois aestheticism you're on the front lines of the Struggle!
Schumpeter mentions another reason why Marxism gives academics such a boner: They resent the hell out of not having as much fame and clout as celebrities and politicians and, yes, successful capitalists, i.e., tycoons. What better way to gain power and glory than to subvert the system that doesn't recognize their supreme importance? They're the champions of all the other people oppressed by the sense of their own insignificance. But put these harmless-looking dweebs in power and they turn into the most vicious infighting self-serving bureaucratic beasts imaginable. All in the name of the People.
LOL that was pretty eloquent, too!
"And I only am escaped alone to tell thee." Not alone, there are plenty of smarter people who also escaped--like David Horowitz and Andrew Breitbart.
The eye of Sauros is surveiling all of us. It seems our entire establishment is hypnotized with lust for power and wealth--in love with the ring. Sauromans, flunkies to an evil Globalist power. In the final battle there are even Asiatic-looking barbarians riding elephants. (RINOS submitting to the CCP?) And we are fighting off the last siege. THAT is an action-adventure.
("Sauros" is not a misspelling, it's a pun.)
To follow this analogy, what's the ring and how do we destroy it? I mean, we need to shatter the illusion of utopia. We need to reform our elections, and we need to break the cycle of indoctrination. Anything else?
Very well written and very smart.
A hint, if you intentionally misspell a word, put it in quotation marks or italics. This way readers get a subtle hint that 1. it is intentionally written as it is and 2. bring awareness of potential special meanings given how it's written differently.
I too failed to see what you meant until I read your hint and was able to exclude the more probable reasons.
Marxism is the bad boy that your moody liquored up nihilistic teenage daughter dates because he's just so gosh darn "cool" and "edgy" and unemployed and he rides a motorcycle and swears a lot and because he's just such an awesome counter-culture noncomformist....
.... who is also a sadistic drug head and degenerate alchoholic with severe behavioral issues who knocks her up and spends half his wasted existence in and out of jail and over the the next 30 years he physically abuses and rapes her until he finally commits suicide with a single self inflicted gunshot wound to the head at the age of 49 ....
.... leaving his numerous bastard spawn to grow up to be just like their daddy.
Yikes, the Fonz in a "Mirror Mirror" Star Trek version of himself, wearing an eye patch and a sash and being all evil and stuff! Or maybe James Dean resurrected after the car wreck as the Dark Master in a Zombie Apocalypse flick? Or Marlon Brando. "What are you rebelling against?" "How much private property you got?"
Seriously, that's quite a detailed psychological profile, and it rings true to the way Marxism has (not) worked.
All of this is very fitting. But there is more than that.
There is the arrogance of intellectual and therefore moral superiority among students and professors, thinking they are some kind of about-to-be elite in society.
Yet they base their wisdom on abstractions over abstractions over abstractions. The issue is that the process of abstraction in itself has one major flaw: It erodes information that in itself may not be too relevant, but taken cumulatively over the process of multiple abstractions will sum up to be decisive.
The mere idea that "Capitalism exploits workers" are multiple leaps of abstract ideas, and they are so far away, that they are entirely disconnected from reality, and therefore entirely false. For one, the definition of Capitalism from Socialists is terrible - even so much that they can't make one up without already embedding "exploitation" into it. "Exploitation" also ignores the fact that these are bi-directionally voluntary transactions and the difference in provided value (which is relatively small btw) is a necessity.
A simple example: You have 10 people, each having the same work power over time (W). Each can work on their own and reach 5W each. Or: There is a business that already provides a platform for workers, where all the bureaucracy and nasty work is taken care of, where people can specialize into one area. Every of these workers working there would have 10W. Now, but you need to make profit off of it... so if you pay them equal to 8W, it's a win-win. They make more money than on their own (+3W), and you make 2W in difference as profit.
As an employee you don't have to care about so many things business owners have to, and you have the luxury of being able to bail out at any time and focus on your thing. All the administrative and bureaucratic nonsense which you may hate is entirely kept away from you. All the larger decision making that involves risks is kept away from you.
And this is what Marxists still call "exploitation." But it's only true if you strip off all the context... WHICH THEY DID.
national socialism technically
Thanks, I changed it.
Damn, that's a beautiful effort-post.
Going to have to save it
Thanks, Pede. You may have guessed I was one of them. Guilty. Contrite. And angry with myself and my professors and colleagues for taking part in this tweedy LARP that turned out to be so fucking poisonous, it's on the verge of killing our democracy.
My Dad never took that step, wish he had. He was offered early retirement from teaching shortly after the DoE was created, and took it. He was smart then, but stayed thoroughly under the influence of the NEA and his brain has been nothing but mush for well over 10 years.
I'm glad you found it interesting. I speak as a person who was once one of THEM.
Now that you mentioned it, yes. Clearly a post written by someone with knowledge on the subject.
It's always especially enlightening to hear from one who has been on the inside.
Years ago I owned and had partially read a book by a Benjamin Gitlow called "I Confess: The Truth About American Communism"
Sadly the book is lost now
Buying the courts and election rigging helps a lot
Well said!
Ding ding ding
marxists are really good at persuasion, it's always the scummy people who are good at this, like used car salesmen and lawyers
Did Yuri ever write a book about his insights? His lectures are wonderful, but I can imagine that they only contain a small portion of the knowledge he gathered while in the USSR.
To be honest with you, I don't know. I do know he was assassinated though. I wish he wrote a book about this topic as well.
So, in Yuri’s outline, we are at Crises right?
All 4 of his steps are complete. He doesn't give any answers for that, but we can still receive guidance from his wisdom. If DJT doesn't concede by 1/6, he's not going to. If he does, we fight. If he crosses the Rubicon, we have 2 weeks to muster, clogging the streets of DC so nothing can move, and conclude appropriately.
Yes, I think so.
When the Venona papers came out decades later, out of the 200 or so people on McCarthy's list only 2 were actually not communists.
He was actually right.
Exactly.
It's crazy to think that he was eventually dismissed as nutty because his was accusing SO MANY PEOPLE of being commie. Turns out their infiltration ran deep and he was right all along.
So true.
One of the tactics of the communists has been to gaslight and strawman arguments, to depict their opposition as insane; slander and lies are their chief weapons.
So true.
Some of the tactics communists use include: gaslighting and strawman arguments, to depict their opposition as insane; slander and lies are their chief weapons.
Even his fellow republican Senators were like, "dude, seriously? Come now..".
They were probably commies in on it too
It’s amazing HE KNEW!
And he was killed for it too!
McCarthy . A true Patriot
If only you knew how right he was...
Oh, we know...
Yes, but imagine if we knew when we had the chance.
I don't know for sure, but I imagine the attitude then was the same as now - some people were worried/warning about it, some were not buying it and/or actively against calling it out...but the commies were then and are now here.
They're just deeper entrenched now. And people will still do nothing about it.
Trump is literally the last hope for it - no other politician will ever be able to do this again. They know better now; they know we can still beat them if they don't rig it all.
In fact McCarthy outed a true commie during the hearings and his opponent faked outrage.
It was all planned.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=svUyYzzv6VI&t=250s
History is a sad litany of missed chances.
Maybe this time with more choppies.
Yep we'll be shipped away if we don't fight back real soon
Hand over your guns, serf. You don't need them. You can trust us.
Sorry, can't hand them over. Lost them in a tragic boating accident.
It has already been happening. What do you think all the anti-White, anti-Western sentiment is harbored from?
Cancel Culture has entered the chat.
fuck face is under valued
but why get hurt from mean words?
everyone here is a "racist homophobic fascist transphobic xenophobic misogynistic cracker hick white supremacist" at all times to everyone in power and all their faggy little underlings and admirers
dont hurt me none
fuck you too faggot
Cant lose when I never accepted the terms of the game. Your bosses housekeepers and security are on our side. Get rekt or learn a trade or skill to earn your keep when the power goes out.
stunning and brave but onlyfans isnt a small business and you will never be a woman
McCarthyism is truth.
VINDICATION
Joe was on the lookout for community organizers before it was cool
Are you saying that 44 would not have been president had McCarthyism been allowed to progress?
I remember we were taught in high school 10 years ago how wrong he was. And that was in a rural high school
Turns out the reds really were under the bed.
And in the Chamber of Commerce, outsourcing every job they could to the enemy
He was right about the important things.
Except his fashion sense. I get it was the fashion at the time, but in this photo it's rather unflattering of him and makes him look like some sort of proto-Nadler.
McCarthy was a hero.
He spoke truth, and they hated him for it.
Fun fact: Before the 2000 election, there were no assigned party colors for election night maps and things had flipped back and forth on a fairly random basis. In the 2000 election, it was apparently important that the Democrat party not be associated with the color red.
I leave you to come to your own conclusions about why that was.
How did a US SENATOR get blamed for alleged abuse by the HOUSE HUAC committee ????
The news at that time was, as now, full of lies and misrepresentation. The public not only got tiny snippets of what was really happening, but the snippets were twisted and even plain falsehoods. The New York Times and others presented McCarthy as a rude and aggressive idiot and the opposing sides as reasonable and civil. However, some who requested court transcripts saw that McCarthy was intelligent and civil with great points, while his opposition greeted him with emotional ad hominem and slanders.
Correct. What played out back then was a carbon copy of the media gaslighting we have today. The New York Times has a long and storied history of running propaganda cover for treasonous communists
Yup.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venona_project
I remember they used to teach about this I’m history class. Calling it McCarthyism. Like it was a bad thing. They’re literally pumping out little communists yearly. I bought into all of it for a bit too. Climate, vegan, bullshit bullshit bullshit.
Anybody else notice how prominently dark Georgia is in this picture? Wonder why?
If he was wrong they would have ignored him.
McCarthy Didn't go far enough
General George S. Patton was right too. Should’ve joined forces with the Wehrmacht and went after the Russians/China communists.
Literally vindicated
The Thirteen Colonies are represented as red and white stripes on Old Glory Georgia was the bottom Colony Can you guess its color on that grayscale map?
Venona knows:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venona_project
Me too.
I only have one question: Will Ted Cruz change his last name to McCarthy and purge the communists?
Toss commies from helis.
It ain't grammatical but I approve.
We need more McCarthy’s now!
I always thought he was a jerk. The way I learned abt him in school was that he was a fear monger & was wrong...
In the end, this man was 1000% correct. If ppl had listened to him, we wouldn’t be where we are today
McCarthy was absolutely right. A true anticommunist, American patriot and a real leader.
Communist radicals in the state department lost China to the CCP by betraying Chiang Kai-shek and giving aid and comfort to Mao Zedong. Prominent public intellectuals and government officials committed treason against the United States, spying for Soviet intelligence as proven by the Venona intercepts. If McCarthy was listened to back then our country would be in a far better place than it is today
I was always taught that he was a paranoid zealot that made baseless accusations.
He was right. And now we are paying the price for not listening to him.
Let them lose. Time to break the GOP, leave it to the uni-party globalist.
It's time for the Deplorables start their own party.
I SEE RED!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vKj4upY1VYI
I can remember back in grade school they painted McCarthy as a paranoid nutjob ruining peoples' lives with the HUAC. It was only a few years ago I realized not only that McCarthy was right, but that he took one for the team and should've pushed harder. Sadly I don't think he even knew the extent of communist corruption.
He was right.
He was right!!
WE DIDN'T LISTEN!!!!
Miss me now?
It's easier to flush them out now with technology.
Bring back the fuckin HUAC.
In a Dem controlled House? Are you sure that's a smart idea? That sounds like a guaranteed way to see Trump impeached again and again.
By the way, someone should investigate this:
Chinese Progressive Association (San Francisco)
https://cpasf.org/
The good red or the bad red?
Commies aren't human.
Proud supporter of Trumpism
There needs to be a memorial to this man in Washington DC. He has been wronged and maligned for 70 years. It’s time to change that.
My hero.
We got so wrapped up with Muh Terrism, Muh Medicare 4 All, and let corporate America and our elites in universities and government sell out to the commies.
Gonna have to shoot our way out of this one, huh?
Anyone know of good literature about him?